The Guardian Australia

Boral hit by shareholde­r class action despite law change only days ago

- Ben Butler

Law firm Maurice Blackburn has launched a new shareholde­r class action, against building products supplier Boral, just days after the treasurer, Josh Frydenberg, used emergency coronaviru­s powers in an attempt to clamp down on the practice.

The move came as Frydenberg defended his decision to water down laws requiring companies and directors to keep the market informed about important changes in their businesses against attacks by investors concerned that the move will make Australia a less safe place to buy shares.

But the treasurer’s re-engineerin­g of Australian corporate law could be short-lived, with Labor, which has expressed concerns about the move, saying it is considerin­g asking parliament to knock down the determinat­ion that brought the change into force.

In a speech on Wednesday night, the head of the prudential regulator, Wayne Byres, also stressed the importance of transparen­cy in the stock market, saying it would be a mistake to “switch the lights off in the mistaken view that it’d be better for everyone to operate in the dark”.

Maurice Blackburn’s lawsuit, to be filed in the federal court on Thursday, accuses Boral of making misleading or deceptive statements to the market about financial irregulari­ties in its US windows business.

Boral’s share price fell in December and again in February when the company told the ASX that finance workers in the US windows division had artificial­ly pumped up the unit’s profits.

However, Maurice Blackburn said the company knew about the irregulari­ties more than two years earlier – the end of August 2017 – and should have told the market about them then.

The case has been mounted under the continuous disclosure regime that was in force on Monday, before Frydenberg suddenly changed the law.

• Sign up to receive the top stories from Guardian Australia every morning

“A functionin­g class actions system is a deterrent to corporate malfeasanc­e, and signals to both investors and consumers that wrongdoing comes at a price, bolstering confidence and ensuring the efficient allocation of capital in the market,” Maurice Blackburn principal Julian Schimmel said.

“It is incumbent on companies to inform the market of all relevant informatio­n relating to the operation of the business as soon as they arise.”

Labor believes Frydenberg’s Monday afternoon determinat­ion can be disallowed – effectivel­y cancelled

– by parliament in the same way as regulation­s made during more normal times.

“We haven’t formed a view yet on whether we’ll disallow it,” the shadow assistant treasurer, Stephen Jones, told Guardian Australia.

Advisers to more than $2tn in capital have told Guardian Australia they are concerned about Frydenberg’s move, which changes the test of whether a director or company has failed to disclose informatio­n from an objective one to one that would require a judge to discern their state of mind at the time.

“We run a risk that the whole market gets stained if someone does pull off a heist,” Dean Paatsch, a cofounder of proxy adviser Ownership Matters, said.

Frydenberg told Guardian Australia the change was “intended to provide companies with the confidence to release more potentiall­y price sensitive informatio­n to the market, not less”.

“Under the changes, companies continue to be required to comply with continuous disclosure obligation­s and remain liable for breaches of continuous disclosure laws,” he said.

“During this uncertain period, it is crucial that markets remain well informed and continue to function effectivel­y.”

Byres, the chairman of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, said corporate transparen­cy would “become even more important” in the post Covid-19 era.

“In times of uncertaint­y, timely, reliable and accurate informatio­n is especially highly valued,” he said.

“Moreover, we have learned from previous crises that if markets lose faith in any of those characteri­stics, they will tend to run first and ask questions later.

“We cannot afford that to happen. It is very important that we continue to promote transparen­cy, and not be tempted to panic and switch the lights off in the mistaken view that it’d be better for everyone to operate in the dark.”

 ?? Photograph: David Gray/Reuters ?? Lawsuit accuses Boral of making misleading or deceptive statements to the market about financial irregulari­ties in its US windows business.
Photograph: David Gray/Reuters Lawsuit accuses Boral of making misleading or deceptive statements to the market about financial irregulari­ties in its US windows business.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia