The Guardian Australia

A-League stands firm against Fox Sports with restart on hold

- Jonathan Howcroft

A plan to conclude the A-League season has been announced by Football Federation Australia, A-League clubs and the players’ union. If it materialis­es, 32 matches will take place in 35 days from mid-July to mid-August. “We are committed to delivering the completion of the Hyundai A-League 2019-20 season,” said FFA CEO James Johnson. 

But there’s a catch. Broadcast partner Fox Sports has not yet agreed to the terms of the resumption, and until that matter is resolved everything is on hold.

The suspension of sporting activity in Australia amidst the Covid-19 pandemic has brought into play the force majeure provision in the broadcast agreement. This means that while matches are not being played Fox Sports can terminate the remaining three years of the deal without penalty. Even if they don’t want to walk away entirely, the option to do so provides enormous leverage in any attempt to renegotiat­e the terms of the contract.

Consequent­ly, FFA are incentivis­ed to return to action as swiftly as possible; Fox Sports are not. By announcing a formal plan to resume the A-League, FFA are telling fans and stakeholde­rs they are ready, and in so doing inviting Fox Sports to communicat­e why a restart should not go ahead (for example for reasons of scheduling or production) alongside the return of the NRL and AFL.

Moreover, in the announceme­nt, head of the A-League Greg O’Rourke indicated a return to competitio­n would not just see the A-League return to business as usual, but feature enhanced commercial opportunit­ies to make the existing deal even sweeter for a broadcaste­r. “We will be including new and innovative elements to the matchday broadcast experience,” O’Rourke said, adding: “Our focus is also on optimising the broadcast flow and therefore providing football content seven days a week. We believe that there are great opportunit­ies for our broadcast partner and therefore the fans.”

In other words, a broadcast partner would need a compelling reason to turn down such an offer. But bringing discussion­s into the public domain, however coded, is not without risk. “We never comment on commercial negotiatio­ns or speculatio­n about broadcast rights,” asserted head of Fox Sports Peter Campbell recently when Rugby Australia was in a not dissimilar predicamen­t. That episode did not end well for rugby, bringing to mind the old adage of not picking fights with anyone who buys ink by the barrel.

So, what is on the table? SBS reported on Wednesday that Fox Sports want to reduce the value of their remaining $57m per year obligation­s by up to 50%. Nine newspapers later indicated that figure could be as high as 70%. Further reports have since circulated that the game has been asked to accept as little as $10m per year. They are not insignific­ant sums, even in an exceptiona­l environmen­t whereby some level of downsizing by all parties must have been expected.

Fox Sports has signalled its dissatisfa­ction with profession­al football for some time as viewing figures and public interest have failed to match the expectatio­ns set following the extension of their relationsh­ip with the A-League in late 2016. This has been accompanie­d by commercial challenges for the broadcaste­r, exacerbate­d by the pandemic.

How much do they now value the content for their own platforms? How much do they not wish to see the product they have invested in for 15 years go elsewhere, and possibly flourish? How much reputation­al damage are they prepared to sustain if they are perceived to be opportunis­tically strongarmi­ng a long-term partner during a crisis?

As the standoff has progressed, the Australian football community has found itself in the not always common position of finding players, clubs and administra­tors aligned strategica­lly under FFA leadership. Discussion­s have been kept largely in-house until this week when a degree of urgency was added owing to a sizeable proportion of A-League players coming out of contract on 1 June.

After intense discussion­s on Tuesday and Wednesday fears of a pay war were averted and the unified bloc prevailed. “Today we took an important step with the clubs and FFA toward ensuring the health of the game’s short and long-term future,” said Profession­al Footballer­s Australia CEO John Didulica.

Australian football is once again on the verge of a boardroom fight that has at stake the profession­al game as we know it. Only this time, for now at least, there is unity within the tent. “FFA, the clubs and the PFA have all worked collaborat­ively throughout this process,” said Western Sydney Wanderers chairman Paul Lederer. “This is about teamwork for the good of the game.”

It remains to be seen if this teamwork is sufficient to restarting the ALeague campaign and returning it to television sets any time soon.

 ??  ?? Football is once again on the verge of a boardroom fight that has at stake the profession­al game at we know it. Photograph: Dean Lewins/ EPA
Football is once again on the verge of a boardroom fight that has at stake the profession­al game at we know it. Photograph: Dean Lewins/ EPA

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia