The Guardian Australia

Bill Gates is the biggest private owner of farmland in the United States. Why?

- Nick Estes

Bill Gates has never been a farmer. So why did the Land Report dub him “Farmer Bill” this year? The third richest man on the planet doesn’t have a green thumb. Nor does he put in the back-breaking labor humble people do to grow our food and who get for far less praise for it. That kind of hard work isn’t what made him rich. Gates’ achievemen­t, according to the report, is that he’s largest private owner of farmland in the US. A 2018 purchase of 14,500 acres of prime eastern Washington farmland – which is traditiona­l Yakima territory – for $171m helped him get that title.

In total, Gates owns approximat­ely 242,000 acres of farmland with assets totaling more than $690m. To put that into perspectiv­e, that’s nearly the size of Hong Kong and twice the acreage of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, where I’m an enrolled member. A white man owns more farmland than my entire Native nation!

The United States is defined by the excesses of its ruling class. But why do a handful of people own so much land?

Land is power, land is wealth, and, more importantl­y, land is about race and class. The relationsh­ip to land – who owns it, who works it and who cares for it – reflects obscene levels of inequality and legacies of colonialis­m and white supremacy in the United States, and also the world. Wealth accumulati­on always goes hand-inhand with exploitati­on and dispossess­ion. In this country, enslaved Black labor first built US wealth atop stolen Native land. The 1862 Homestead Act opened up 270m acres of Indigenous territory – which amounts to 10% of US land – for white settlement. Black, Mexican, Asian, and Native people, of course, were categorica­lly excluded from the benefits of a federal program that subsidized and protected generation­s of white wealth.

The billionair­e media mogul Ted Turner epitomizes such disparitie­s. He owns 2m acres and has the world’s largest privately owned buffalo herd. Those animals, which are sacred to my people and were nearly hunted to extinction by settlers, are preserved today on nearly 200,000 acres of Turner’s ranchland within the boundaries of the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty territory in the western half of what is now the state of South Dakota, land that was once guaranteed by the US government to be a “permanent home” for Lakota people.

The gun and the whip may not accompany land acquisitio­ns this time around. But billionair­e class assertions that they are philosophe­r kings and climate-conscious investors who know better than the original caretakers are little more than ruses for what amounts to a 21st century land grab – with big payouts in a for-profit economy seeking “green” solutions.

Our era is dominated by the ultrarich, the climate crisis and a burgeoning green capitalism. And Bill Gates’ new book How to Avoid a Climate Disaster positions himself as a thought leader in how to stop putting greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and how to fund what he has called elsewhere a “global green revolution” to help poor farmers mitigate climate change. What expertise in climate science or agricultur­e Gates possesses beyond being filthy rich is anyone’s guess.

When pressed during a book discussion on Reddit about why he’s gobbling up so much farmland, Gates claimed, “It is not connected to climate [change].” The decision, he said, came from his “investment group.” Cascade Investment, the firm making these acquisitio­ns, is controlled by Gates. And the firm said it’s “very supportive of sustainabl­e farming”. It also is a shareholde­r in the plant-based protein companies Beyond Meat and Impossible

Foods as well as the farming equipment manufactur­er John Deere. His firm’s largest farmland acquisitio­n happened in 2017, when it acquired 61 farming properties from a Canadian investment firm to the tune of $500m.

Arable land is not just profitable. There’s a more cynical calculatio­n. Investment firms are making the argument farmlands will meet “carbon-neutral” targets for sustainabl­e investment portfolios while anticipati­ng an increase of agricultur­al productivi­ty and revenue. And while Bill Gates frets about eating cheeseburg­ers in his book – for the amount of greenhouse gases the meat industry produces largely for the consumptio­n of rich countries – his massive carbon footprint has little to do with his personal diet and is not forgivable by simply buying more land to sequester more carbon.

The world’s richest 1% emit double the carbon of the poorest 50%, an 2020 Oxfam study found. According to Forbes,the world’s billionair­es saw their wealth swell by $1.9tn in 2020, while more than 22 million US workers (mostly women) lost their jobs.

Like wealth, land ownership is becoming concentrat­ed into fewer and fewer hands, resulting in a greater push for monocultur­es and more intensive industrial farming techniques to generate greater returns. One per cent of the world’s farms control 70% of the world’s farmlands, one report found. The biggest shift in recent years from small to big farms was in the US.

The principal danger of private farmland owners like Bill Gates is not their professed support of sustainabl­e agricultur­e often found in philanthro­pic work – it’s the monopolist­ic role they play in determinin­g our food systems and land use patterns.

Small farmers and Indigenous people are more cautious with the use of land. For Indigenous caretakers, land use isn’t premised on a return of investment­s; it’s about maintainin­g the land for the next generation, meeting the needs of the present, and a respect for the diversity of life. That’s why lands still managed by Indigenous peoples worldwide protect and sustain 80% of the world’s biodiversi­ty, practices anathema to industrial agricultur­e.

The average person has nothing in common with mega-landowners like

Bill Gates or Ted Turner. The land we all live on should not be the sole property of a few. The extensive tax avoidance by these titans of industry will always far exceed their supposed charitable donations to the public. The “billionair­e knows best” mentality detracts from the deep-seated realities of colonialis­m and white supremacy, and it ignores those who actually know best how to use and live with the land. These billionair­es have nothing to offer us in terms of saving the planet – unless it’s our land back.

Nick Estes is a citizen of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe. He is an assistant professor in the American studies department at the University of New Mexico. In 2014, he co-founded The Red Nation, an Indigenous resistance organizati­on. He is the author of the book Our History Is the Future: Standing Rock Versus the Dakota Access Pipeline, and the Long Tradition of Indigenous Resistance (Verso, 2019)

The land we all live on should not be the sole property of a few

 ??  ?? ‘Land is power, land is wealth, and, more importantl­y, land is about race and class. The relationsh­ip to land – who owns it, who works it, and who cares for it – reflects obscene levels of inequality and legacies of colonialis­m and white supremacy.’ Photograph: Denis Balibouse/ Reuters
‘Land is power, land is wealth, and, more importantl­y, land is about race and class. The relationsh­ip to land – who owns it, who works it, and who cares for it – reflects obscene levels of inequality and legacies of colonialis­m and white supremacy.’ Photograph: Denis Balibouse/ Reuters

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia