The Guardian Australia

‘Very frustrated’: England and Wales back down over OneLove armband

- Sean Ingle and Nick Ames in Doha

England, Wales and five other European nations have backed down from wearing the OneLove armband that was intended as a protest at all forms of discrimina­tion at the World Cup in Qatar. The decision came after they were warned by Fifa they would face sporting sanctions, and that their captains could be booked or even forced to leave the pitch.

Instead the captains are expected to wear Fifa-approved armbands promoting different social messages throughout the tournament. On Monday, Fifa announced that the ‘No Discrimina­tion’ message, originally scheduled to be worn by teams in the quarter-finals, would instead be worn in the first group games instead.

In a statement the seven federation­s, also including Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherland­s and Switzerlan­d, expressed dismay at Fifa’s behaviour.

“Fifa has been very clear that it will impose sporting sanctions if our captains wear the armbands on the field of play,” they said. “As national federation­s, we can’t put our players in a position where they could face sporting sanctions including bookings, so we have asked the captains not to attempt to wear the armbands in Fifa World Cup games.

“We were prepared to pay fines that would normally apply to breaches of kit regulation­s and had a strong commitment to wearing the armband. However, we cannot put our players in the situation where they might be booked or even forced to leave the field of play.”

What also frustrated the federation­s was that they had contacted Fifa in September, telling them they planned to wear the rainbow armband in a country where same-sex relationsh­ips are illegal, yet had heard nothing – until Sunday evening.

“We are very frustrated by the Fifa decision which we believe is unpreceden­ted – we wrote to Fifa in September informing them of our wish to wear the One Love armband to actively support inclusion in football, and had no response,” they said. “Our players and coaches are disappoint­ed – they are strong supporters of inclusion and will show support in other ways.”

The federation­s met Fifa on Monday morning to seek clarity over the issue. Before the statement was issued the Denmark manager, Kasper Hjulmand, made clear his bafflement at Fifa’s attitude given the armband was worn, with scant fanfare, during Nations League games in September. That competitio­n falls under Uefa’s jurisdicti­on.

“This is not something invented for this occasion, it’s something we’ve done before,” he said. “A OneLove armband – I can’t see the problem to be honest.”

The Dutch federation said in a separate statement: “Our No 1 priority at the World Cup is to win the games. Then you don’t want the captain to start the match with a yellow card.”

The Guardian has spoken to Qatari and Fifa sources who insisted the decision was taken purely by football’s governing body – and that there had been no pressure from Qatar regarding the armband. A Fifa source also pointed out that the regulation­s have long been clear that unapproved armbands are not allowed – and therefore nothing had really changed.

Fifa said in a statement: “Fifa can confirm its No Discrimina­tion campaign has been brought forward from the planned quarter-finals stage in order that all 32 captains will have the opportunit­y to wear this armband during the Fifa World Cup Qatar 2022.

“This is in line with Article 13.8.1 of the Fifa equipment regulation­s, which state: ‘For Fifa final competitio­ns, the captain of each team must wear the captain’s armband provided by Fifa.

“The Fifa World Cup Qatar 2022 regulation­s, as approved by everyone in the game, exist to preserve the integrity of the field of play for all participan­ts and are equally applicable to all competing teams.

“Fifa is an inclusive organisati­on that wants to put football to the benefit of society by supporting good and legitimate causes, but it has to be done within the framework of the competitio­n regulation­s which are known to everyone.”

The decision was quickly greeted with dismay by fans and LGBTQ+ groups. The Football Supporters’ Associatio­n said: “LGBT+ football supporters and their allies will feel angry. Today we feel betrayed. Today we feel contempt for an organisati­on that has shown its true values by giving the yellow card to players and the red card to tolerance.

“Never again should a World Cup be handed out solely on the basis of money and infrastruc­ture. No country which falls short on LGBT+ rights, women’s rights, workers’ rights or any other universal human right should be given the honour of hosting a World Cup.”

The veteran gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell said that Fifa’s president, Gianni Infantino, had showed his “true colours” after speaking about inclusivit­y at the weekend.

“I urge the team captains at their post-match press conference­s to spend just 30 seconds to speak out for the rights of women, LGBTs and migrant workers,” he said. “That would have a huge impact, reaching a global audience of hundreds of millions of people.

“Fifa has crushed the OneLove campaign with the threat of yellow cards. It’s time to show Fifa and Qatar the red card,” he added.

Infantino said he had spoken to Qatar’s “highest leadership” and “I can confirm that everyone is welcome”.

The British Olympian and BBC presenter Jeannette Kwakye expressed disappoint­ment at the FA’s decision. “The most powerful protests in global sport have not required permission,” she pointed out on social media.

 ?? Photograph: The FA/ ?? England’s Harry Kane wearing the OneLove armband in September.
Photograph: The FA/ England’s Harry Kane wearing the OneLove armband in September.
 ?? Photograph: Qian Jun/ATP/SPP/Rex/ Shuttersto­ck ?? The emir of Qatar, Tamim bin Hamad alThani, with Fifa’s president, Gianni Infantino.
Photograph: Qian Jun/ATP/SPP/Rex/ Shuttersto­ck The emir of Qatar, Tamim bin Hamad alThani, with Fifa’s president, Gianni Infantino.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia