The Guardian Australia

Bonkers football jargon puts people off the game. It needs an idiot filter, and I’m volunteeri­ng

- Adrian Chiles Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publicatio­n in our letters section, please click here.

Istarted out in journalism presenting programmes about financial matters. I tried to take this often complicate­d subject matter and make it as simple as possible. When moved into presenting football on television, it often felt as if we were endeavouri­ng to do the opposite – take something as simple as football and make it as complicate­d as possible. Don’t get me wrong: the analysis of the best ex-footballer­s in the business, as long as they use the most accessible language, can be fascinatin­g. My favourite to work with was the former Arsenal and England player Lee Dixon. To make sure what he was saying was intelligib­le, he used to run it past me first. He called me, very few might say unkindly, his idiot filter. But I was very proud to perform this function for him because I was very good at it.

Working Lunch was the business programme I co-presented with Adam Shaw, who was as expert on matters financial as Lee was on football. And, like Lee, Adam used me as a bit of an idiot filter, too. Interestin­gly, Adam used to say of football that he’d like to be more into it but found a lot of the language around it baffling. This made him feel excluded, as if he was a guest at the wrong party.

I think about this a lot, especially at World Cups, when many non-fans may engage with football. I hope they fall in love with this simple, beautiful game, but we don’t make it easy for them. Straining the rivers of football talk through my expert-approved idiot filter, I find a good deal of guff stuck in the mesh. What is a casual viewer to make of a team described as being “good in the transition”? Or a team needing to, in the words of England’s captain, Harry Kane, “play better with

the ballin the attacking third”? And how about a player described as “more of an 8 than a 10”? The uninitiate­d will assume they are being judged, unfavourab­ly, as more of an 8 out of 10 than a 10 out of 10. It doesn’t mean that. As for what it does mean, I’m afraid that this idiot isn’t quite sure.

• Adrian Chiles is a broadcaste­r, writer and Guardian columnist

 ?? Photograph: ITV Sport ?? Harry Kane speaking after England v USA in Qatar.
Photograph: ITV Sport Harry Kane speaking after England v USA in Qatar.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia