The Guardian Australia

Concussed: Sport’s Uncomforta­ble Truth by Sam Peters review – rugby’s shame

- Oliver-James Campbell

Profession­al rugby branded Sam Peters a pariah. It was he who spearheade­d the Mail on Sunday’s concussion campaign against the sport’s ruling bodies in 2013. And a decade later – at the end of the Rugby World Cup 2023 – the shadow of a mass lawsuit concerning concussion­s continues to hang over World Rugby.

As a reporter, Peters interviewe­d former players whose lives had been irrevocabl­y altered by concussion­s and other injuries, which were aggravated or outright caused by lax rules, regulation­s and attitudes encouraged from the top down. The RFU and other prominent organisati­ons in the sport shot down any attempt to question the status quo – rather bullishly, it seems.

Peters makes the case for how profession­al rugby has become more dangerous and explains how the risk to players’ health has increased dramatical­ly since turning profession­al in 1995. Distilling his argument – as he presents a host of academic reports, personal case studies, anecdotes and newspaper clippings throughout – it comes down to the following.

He believes the need to appeal to a wider audience became an “unhealthy obsession” in the years after the sport became profession­al. Rules were rewritten in order to attract more viewers, in pursuit of more sponsorshi­p and advertisin­g. “Laws were constantly tweaked to speed up the game and improve the spectacle,” he says. “Collisions replaced contacts, hits replaced tackles. Passes became offloads. Tackles were more frequent, scrums reduced, hits got bigger. Money rolled in. Audiences grew.”

The physicalit­y of the players changed too. Peters notes that in 1987 at the first Rugby World Cup, the average weight of the South African national team was 14st 7lb, while at the 2019 final, 24 years into profession­alism, the average weight was 16st 12lb. While previously players were taught to tackle passively, the tackle was now seen as a weapon with which to hit an opponent. “Everyone knew the sport was far more dangerous than ever before,” says Peters.

He was one of the few to voice concerns for the players. He read about concussion­s and their link to chronic traumatic encephalop­athy, or CTE. Peters began noticing parallels between profession­al rugby and the NFL, which in 2013, settled a class-action lawsuit brought by 4,500 ex-football players, who said they were misled about the long-term effects of head injuries. But the sport’s top organisati­ons were firm on their stance that there was no issue. According to them, no such link between repeated head trauma and CTE was proven.

Peters details several issues with the way profession­al rugby disregarde­d player injuries. First, an injury surveillan­ce audit was introduced in 2002/3, which became the baseline; however, it is “entirely probable [that the amount of injuries sustained] had shifted dramatical­ly in the previous seven years” (since the sport turned profession­al).

Another concern was the lack of transparen­cy around the data. It was collected by individual club physios and medical teams and then processed by Bath University, which meant it was effectivel­y “processed in-house” because of the RFU’s close commercial relationsh­ip with Bath University. Peters became “convinced that the RFU and Premiershi­p Rugby were misreprese­nting the data generated” by “using individual statistics to bolster the ‘rugby is safe’ narrative”. When in fact, it showed a rise in oneoff potentiall­y career-ending injuries, which went from three in 2002/3 to 12 in 2017/18.

Finally, Peters argues that the matchday medical staff were compromise­d. They were employed by the teams and at the behest of the coaches, who had a vested interest in keeping their star players on the field. Contrary to the pitchside concussion­s assessment – an RFU rule that said players were not to return to the game after a suspected concussion – medics would allow them to do this repeatedly. Peters cites both Lewis Moody and George North being knocked out twice before being allowed to play on in 2007 and 2015 respective­ly. The latter he calls: “one of rugby’s worst examples of concussion mismanagem­ent”.

By 2022, however, organisati­ons began to change their stance. The RFU conceded a potential connection between repeated head trauma and CTE. Paul McCrory, “this century’s most influentia­l sports doctor” and a key critic of the link, was exposed as a serial plagiarist, misreprese­nting data and using other researcher­s’ work as his own. McCrory was the lead on the Concussion in Sport Group, from which the RFU took its advice about concussion­s. Among other changes, independen­t matchday doctors were employed at internatio­nal games.

Today there is a legal case against World Rugby, the RFU and the Welsh Rugby Union, with more than 300 explayers involved, alleging that they suffered brain injuries sustained during their careers.

Concussedi­s a call to action, which shows Peters’s unwavering passion for the safety of the players in a sport he loves so much. The tension between Peters and profession­al rugby’s top organisati­ons is palpable; there is a real sense of mission in his voice – and vitriol for those who held back the sport for so long.

Concussed: Sport’s Uncomforta­ble Truth by Sam Peters is published by Atlantic (£20). To support the Guardian and Observer order your copy at guardianbo­okshop.com. Delivery charges may apply

Both Lewis Moody and George North [were] knocked out twice before being allowed to play on

 ?? ?? ‘Laws were constantly tweaked to speed up the game and improve the spectacle,’ writes Peters. Photograph: Jane Williams/Alamy
‘Laws were constantly tweaked to speed up the game and improve the spectacle,’ writes Peters. Photograph: Jane Williams/Alamy
 ?? ?? ‘Unwavering passion for the safety of the players in a sport he loves’: Sam Peters. Photograph: Sarah Dollar
‘Unwavering passion for the safety of the players in a sport he loves’: Sam Peters. Photograph: Sarah Dollar

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia