The Guardian Australia

Government urged not to resurrect fees for UK employment tribunals

- Sarah Butler

Unions and workers’ rights groups are urging the government to reconsider plans to reintroduc­e fees for employment tribunals amid fears it will encourage exploitati­on.

A coalition of 48 organisati­ons, including the TUC, Citizens Advice, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the Fawcett Society and Maternity Action, said bringing back fees, which were ditched in 2017, meant “bad employers are being given the go-ahead to undercut good ones”.

The government was forced to ditch a previous fee regime, under which charges ranged from £390 to £1,200 depending on the case, after the supreme court ruled it was preventing access to justice, breaching UK and EU law. The number of cases brought by individual­s dropped by almost 70% after the fees were first introduced in 2013 by Chris Grayling, the lord chancellor at the time.

In a joint statement the workers’ rights groups said the new fees, which start from £55 to bring a claim, risked pricing many people out of workplace justice. “We believe [reintroduc­ing fees] will deter many from lodging worthy claims and gives a green light to bad employers to exploit their workers,” they said.

“Bad employers are being given the go-ahead to undercut good ones, safe in the knowledge they are less likely to face claims in the employment tribunal … Employment rights are only real if they are enforced.”

While the initial fee can cover a claim on behalf of more than one person, an additional £55 appeal fee would be charged for each judgment, decision, direction or order being appealed against. Some employment tribunal rulings, such as the hard-fought case over employment status by Uber drivers, faced multiple appeals hearings over many years, meaning that significan­t costs could still be racked up for claimants.

The government said last month that it was on consulting on bringing back fees, arguing that the proposed costs were low enough to allow workers to pursue low-value claims. Help would also be available for those who could not afford the fee.

There is also an exemption for individual­s using a tribunal to claim their right to a payment from the national insurance fund, which usually relates to pension contributi­ons or redundancy payments where an employer is insolvent.

It said “careful considerat­ion has been given to the lessons learned” from 2017 and the new fees would be “proportion­ate and affordable” in line with the supreme court judgment. The consultati­on will run until 25 March.

The government said the new fees would “ensure users are paying towards the running costs of the tribunals and put its users on broadly the same footing as users of other courts and tribunals who already pay fees”.

It has said it expects the fees to generate up to £1.7m a year from 2025, and that it cost £80m to run employment tribunals last year.

Paul Nowak, general secretary of the TUC, said working people should be able to enforce their rights.

“Introducin­g fees for tribunals puts yet another hurdle in the way of those seeking justice at their most vulnerable moment. The Conservati­ves have already tried this and failed.

“Last time they introduced tribunal fees, claims dropped by two-thirds, and the supreme court threw fees out, saying they interfered with access to justice.

“That should have been the nail in the coffin for these cynical plans, but ministers have decided to side with bad bosses over workers and resurrect employment tribunal fees.”

A Ministry of Justice spokespers­on said: “Our consultati­on proposal to introduce a modest fee of £55 would help save the taxpayer money and ensure our court system continues to run effectivel­y and efficientl­y.

“We are protecting access to justice for all and have launched a more generous scheme providing financial help for those who cannot afford to pay the proposed fees.”

 ?? Photograph: Anthony Devlin/PA Wire/Press Associatio­n Images ?? Forty-eight organisati­ons said bringing back fees meant ‘bad employers are being given the go-ahead to undercut good ones’.
Photograph: Anthony Devlin/PA Wire/Press Associatio­n Images Forty-eight organisati­ons said bringing back fees meant ‘bad employers are being given the go-ahead to undercut good ones’.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia