The Saturday Paper

Kevin Rudd on the truth about Murdoch’s cable ambitions

- Kevin Rudd is a former prime minister of Australia.

Before the past couple of years, most Australian­s were either unaware of Sky News or considered it a bit of a joke. The consensus was that nobody watched it, and the people who did were out on the fringe. Anyone who maintains this today is simply not living in the present.

The truth is more than nine million Australian­s – one in three of us – watch

Sky News every month. They do so across more platforms than any other news outlet. Foxtel makes up barely one-third of Sky News’s reach each month; most of it happens online, through Youtube and Facebook.

Sky’s Youtube channel alone has twice the viewership of the ABC, and more subscriber­s than the three commercial networks combined.

To this, the Murdoch-owned Sky News has just added a free-to-air TV network broadcast throughout regional Australia, targeting the very markets hardest hit by Murdoch’s closure last year of 112 regional newspapers and the mass sacking of journalist­s. These were closed on the pretext of Murdoch being financiall­y strapped amid the pandemic; in reality, News Corp has just recorded the best year in its corporate history, bolstered by tens of millions of dollars in annual payments from Facebook and Google.

So the reality is that millions are now watching Sky News, and this has largely escaped the attention of journalist­s, academics and even the political class. It’s happening under our feet and targeted at the critical seats that will decide the next election, particular­ly in regional Queensland.

It’s therefore misguided to think of Sky News as a cable news network with an online presence. It is a multiplatf­orm behemoth whose feedstock is a 24-hour news channel. Alan Jones and Andrew Bolt may consider themselves television stars, but they’re really among Australia’s biggest Youtube influencer­s.

The revelation that Youtube – a platform known for its infamously light touch to neo-nazis and flat-earthers – had suspended Sky News’s uploading privileges for one week surprised many Australian­s who don’t watch the network. Those who watch it closely understand that it has adopted the same business model that transforme­d Murdoch’s Fox News from a right-leaning news channel into one of the most potent forces in American politics. Indeed, Youtube’s action against Sky News was almost as predictabl­e as the Murdoch media’s explosive response, which labelled it the “most extreme cancellati­on of free speech imaginable” and even invoked the Holocaust.

Of course, the shrill cries about an assault on “freedom” are a distractio­n.

Press freedom has never come without responsibi­lity to the truth. The alternativ­e propositio­n – unrestrain­ed free speech meaning the right to invent your own facts – would be untenable. Murdoch has spent decades resisting and underminin­g all efforts to develop substantia­l industryle­d regulation. As the country’s dominant media organisati­on, which routinely censors facts it finds inconvenie­nt, it can hardly complain about another company exercising its right to restrict the spread of dangerous misinforma­tion. Of course, they know they’re in the wrong, which is why they’ve spent the past week purging their websites of incriminat­ing videos.

Murdoch’s strategy for Sky News has four stages. The first step is to latch onto a segment of the Australian community and divorce them from reality. The Fox News model depends on the audience believing that all other media outlets – especially the ABC and any non-murdoch newspapers – are endemicall­y biased to the left and cannot be believed. Only Sky News, Murdoch newspapers and certain talkback radio hosts can be trusted. While it’s often argued that rusted-on viewers don’t expect expert opinion or unbiased coverage from Sky News, this is actually false; News Corp’s own market research suggests Sky News viewers believe they are getting expert commentary and accurate, unbiased coverage.

Second, Murdoch keeps these viewers in a far-right echo chamber where they are radicalise­d and taught to revile their cultural enemies. The key to this is the presentati­on of “experts” who are anything but. Antivaccin­ation MP Craig Kelly, who was exiled from the Liberal Party for spreading lies about the pandemic, is the resident expert on epidemiolo­gy. Climate change sceptic

Ian Plimer, a trained geologist and mining industry figure, joins Kelly as a go-to voice on climate science. Daily Telegraph political editor James Morrow, who says Black Lives Matter is a “de-facto terrorist organisati­on” under the control of Joe Biden’s Democrats, is an authority on race relations. Watch enough Sky News and you’ll believe there is no pandemic, climate change is a hoax and Donald Trump is the rightful president of the United States.

You can see this echo chamber playing out in live action online. In May, some Sky

News viewers responded with utter jubilation online at the attempted murder of Sasha Johnson, a young female Black Lives Matter activist who was shot through the head in London. The sentiments hailed the “start of the fightback” and urged more killings. Another called for the forced deportatio­n of Black people to Africa. One comment even quoted the Australian terrorist who committed the Christchur­ch mosque massacres. Perhaps most shocking, these were the comments that remained after they had been moderated. Imagine what was screened out.

Third, Murdoch uses this audience to make a boatload of cash. Once you have divorced your audience from reality and placed them in this echo chamber, there is no financial penalty for lying to them. In fact, there are only financial benefits. Fox News is now the jewel in the crown of the Murdoch empire, sweeping the top-five-most-watched shows in cable news. News Corp’s record revenue was buoyed by 170 per cent growth for Sky News on Facebook, and 248 per cent growth on Youtube.

Fourth, Murdoch deploys his captive audience to take over the conservati­ve side of politics. The radicalise­d corps of Fox News devotees are now a major voting bloc inside the Republican Party, having helped to deliver the presidency to Donald Trump in 2016. In fact, it is inconceiva­ble that any Republican could snare their party’s nomination without the support of Fox News. This same pattern is now being replicated in Australia. Malcolm Turnbull’s Liberal colleagues infamously demanded he cosy up to Sky News to salvage his prime ministersh­ip. As Liberal MP Ted O’brien said at the time: “It’s as though my branch members are having a meeting with Alan Jones and Peta Credlin every night.”

Murdoch and Sky have captured the Liberal and National Party base. And when you add that to the attempted Pentecosta­l takeover of entire state branches of the Liberal Party, as happened in South Australia recently, you are already well down the American far-right road. The latest Digital News Report by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and the University of Canberra finds the Sky News audience self-identifies as more right-wing than Fox News viewers do.

Few Americans anticipate­d the destructiv­e potential of Fox News when it began eating away at the social fabric of the US. We have no excuse for such complacenc­y. Australia is especially vulnerable given how Sky News compounds Murdoch’s strangleho­ld on commercial media: a national monopoly on daily newspaper circulatio­n at about 70 per cent; the biggest-selling newspapers in every state east of the Nullarbor; a virtual

100 per cent monopoly in Queensland; the No. 1 commercial news website; ownership of one of only two national newswires, and with plans to muscle in on the competitio­n; and, finally, a network of paid-up Murdoch commentato­rs seeded throughout rival media outlets, including The West Australian and Nine’s talkback radio network.

Every single day, these outlets are flooding our public conversati­on and what passes for our national debates, with disinforma­tion designed to advance Murdoch’s extremist ideologica­l agenda and narrow commercial interests.

What then is the answer? My considered judgement after more than four decades in and around politics is a royal commission. A properly empowered royal commission­er would take a long, hard look at the pressures on media in Australia and around the world. More importantl­y, they can look at how different global jurisdicti­ons are dealing with these challenges and recommend options to government.

The alternativ­e is to continue this slide into oblivion – with increasing concentrat­ion of ownership and regular mass sackings of journalist­s – until we wake up one day to find that we are a second-rate country with a thirdrate media and a democracy that has become basically ungovernab­le as Murdoch divides us into warring tribes whose only exchange is ritual abuse rather than something as quaint as fact-based debate.

For me, the question isn’t whether we have a royal commission. It’s whether we have one now, while there’s still time to reverse the trend of mass sackings, consolidat­ion of ownership and rising disinforma­tion, or whether we have one in the wake of an extremist outrage of the kind we saw in Washington on January 6.

Many Americans – including the former US director of national intelligen­ce, retired Lieutenant-general James Clapper – wish they’d had an independen­t public inquiry long before their political system spiralled out of control. Such an inquiry now seems almost unimaginab­le, as partisan divisions are tied to cultural identity. We ignore this lesson at our peril.

“It’s misguided to think of Sky News as a cable news network with an online presence. It is a multiplatf­orm behemoth whose feedstock is a 24-hour news channel. Alan Jones and Andrew Bolt … are really among Australia’s biggest Youtube influencer­s.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia