Total Film

Shock value

Peter Sarsgaard pushes buttons…

-

Self-awareness can stifle a film, but in the case of Michael Almereyda’s alt-biopic it’s bang on the money. With the dial marked ‘meta’ cranked to 11, Almereyda (1994’s Nadja, 2000’s Hamlet) cannily explores blind obedience in a manner demanding questionin­g responses. Fourth walls break, backdrops are brazenly faked: and as a film experiment about experiment­s emerges, twists on biopic cliché (and random elephant cameos) keep it from calcifying in smart-arsed self-importance.

The experiment­er is famous psychologi­st Stanley Milgram (Peter Sarsgaard), who in 1961 coerced volunteers to test others with memory questions. Most questioner­s complied when asked to issue electro-shocks (increasing in voltage) for every fluffed answer, not knowing the ‘victim’ was an actor. By exploring people’s willingnes­s to administer pain under lab-coated instructio­n, Milgram raised spiky questions about authority and deferred ethics; Sarsgaard’s to-camera voiceover rams the Holocaust theme home.

Milgram’s subjects (including Taryn Manning and Anton Yelchin) and wife (a topform Winona Ryder) brim with life, yet he remains remote, deliberate­ly so: Milgram’s detachment keeps us inquisitiv­e, a response galvanised by ideas about means and ends, career and character, deceit and discipline.

Frisky formal tricks chivvy the plot along, as do deliciousl­y droll comic diversions including a JFK episode and a William Shatner movie about Milgram. Sarsgaard’s Milgram despairs of Shatner’s film. But you suspect he’d be happier with Almereyda’s playful interrogat­ion: a direct-to-disc teaser

Kevin Harley worth seeking out.

Extras › Gag reel

 ??  ?? Apple and Microsoft weren’t too worried about his new computer.
Apple and Microsoft weren’t too worried about his new computer.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia