Rokeby rural lots given thumbs-up

A subdivision to create rural living lots in Rokeby has been supported by Baw Baw Shire despite planners recommending the application be refused.

Councillors supported a six-lot subdivision of land on Brandy Creek Rd, put forward by Rokeby Investments.

The application proposed to create three lots of 1811 square metres each, one lot of 2583 square metres, a 4007 square metre lot and the remainder of the land would be 20.4 hectares.

The applicant argued the smaller lot sizes were appropriate on the basis they were similar to the properties to the west and there was provision in the rural living zone for smaller lots to be created.

Josh Tyrrell said they were aware of the demand for rural properties and this property in the centre of Rokeby was perfect.

He said the dam on the property was an iconic feature of the area and would be a feature of the subdivision.

Johnathan Neilson described the subdivision as a “high quality, unoffensive development” that enhanced the existing character of Rokeby.

He said the smaller lots had been sensitively designed.

Council received two objections and a submission. One objection was later withdrawn. The objector stated the subdivision was out of character with the Rokeby township and also raised concerns about traffic.

The submission said more infrastructure needed to be provided to accommodate safe pedestrian access and the preference for streetscaping works.

Planners said the application was inconsistent with the purpose and objectives of the rural living zone.

Officers said the subdivision did not “respect the existing neighbourhood character and does not provide an appropriate transition from the existing residential lots to the farming areas.”

“The proposed subdivision has been designed in such a manner as to potentially maximise the lot yield possible for the site without due consideration of the potential impact which the built form and density on the subject landscape.

“The outcome inevitably undermines the attributes that define the character of the surrounding area and the development pattern being sought for Rokeby,” officers said.

Moving that council go against the officer’s recommendation and issue a notice of decision to approve the subdivision, Cr Darren Wallace said the grounds for refusal outlined by officers did not add up.

Cr Wallace said the rural living zone allowed lots to be created on lots smaller than one hectare. This zone is designed for growth,” he said.

Cr Joe Gauci said it was the perfect opportunity for a subdivision that fitted in with the community of Rokeby.

“This is an opportunity for five families to live in a rural atmosphere.

There are times that it just makes sense to let this happen,” he said.

Cr Michael Leaney said the subdivision would “fit well in Rokeby.”

“This is important to the town. It will re-invigorate Rokeby and create a smalltown atmosphere,” he said.

Cr Danny Goss said he had some difficulty trying to see how the officers reached their conclusion and recommendation for refusal.

“We shouldn’t be against development like this. It will be good for the town,” he said.