Weekend Gold Coast Bulletin

Security breach puts millions at cyber risk

-

WASHINGTON: Hackers stole social security identifica­tion numbers and other highly sensitive data from more than 21 million people, the Obama administra­tion said yesterday.

Officials acknowledg­ed that the breach of US government computer systems was far more severe than previously disclosed.

The scope of the data breach, believed to be the biggest in US history, has grown dramatical­ly since the government first said earlier this year that hackers had entered the Office of Personnel Manage- ment’s personnel database and stolen records for about 4.2 million people.

Since then, the administra­tion has acknowledg­ed a second, related breach of systems housing private data that individual­s submit during background investigat­ions to obtain security clearances.

That second attack affected more than 19 million people who applied for clearances, as well as nearly 2 million of their spouses, housemates and others who never applied for security clearances, the administra­tion said.

Among the data the hackers stole: criminal, financial, health, employment and residency histories, as well as informatio­n about their families and acquaintan­ces.

The new revelation­s drew indignatio­n from members of Congress who have said the administra­tion has not done enough to protect personal data in their systems, as well as calls for OPM Director Katherine Archuleta and her top deputies to resign.

In a conference call with reporters, Archuleta said the hackers also got hold of the user names and passwords that prospectiv­e employees used to fill out their background investigat­ion forms, as well as the contents of interviews conducted as part of those investigat­ions.

Yet the government insisted there were no indication­s that the hackers have used the data they stole.

Numerous US lawmakers have said China was behind the attack. But Michael Daniel, President Barack Obama’s cybersecur­ity co-ordinator, said the government wasn’t ready to say who was responsibl­e.

Officials have acknowledg­ed that the same party was responsibl­e for both of the breaches, which took place in 2014 and early 2015.

Investigat­ors previously told AP that the US government was increasing­ly confident that China’s government, and not criminal hackers, was responsibl­e.

China has publicly denied involvemen­t in the break-in.

Earlier yesterday, during a round-table discussion with reporters, FBI Director James Comey described the scope of the OPM breach as “huge”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia