Johnson recklessly picks at the scabs of Ireland’s violent past
On 8 May 1987 a Provisional IRA unit of eight men atacked a police station in thevillageofloughgallincountyarmagh 15 miles from the Irish border. One man drove a digger with a bomb in its bucket towards the building, half of which was destroyed in the explosion. But British forces had been informed of the time and place of the assault and SAS soldiers waiting in ambush opened fire killing all eight Provisionals and a civilian.
A quarter of a century later in county Monaghan just inside the border with the Irish Republic but not far from Loughgall, there was an incident proving that the earlier killings were still a live issue. In the last few days somebody, evidently an opponent of the IRA, used a bulldozer to demolish a substantial memorial to two IRA men, Jim Lynagh and Padraig Mckearney, who had died in the SAS ambush.
A statement from the Loughgall Truth and Justice Campaign described the bulldozing of the memorial as a “desecration” and declared that “to do this to any of the Loughgall families is to do this to us all... but our memories and thoughts cannot be erased”. The episode is significant because it shows the human and divisive reality of the Irish border and why its reappearance at the top of the political agenda is such a threat to long-term peace. The backstop is oten discussed in Britain as if it was an issue primarily to do with trade
which has been given exaggerated significance by Ireland and the EU in order to sabotage Brexit. Boris Johnson denounces it as being unacceptably “anti-democratic”.
In all cases, there is blindness towards the true reason for the toxicity of the dispute over the 310mile border which stems from it being the physical embodiment of relations between nationalists and unionists, Catholics and Protestants not just in the border region but in the north as a whole.
That is why it has been one of the most foughtover and blood-soaked frontiers in Europe over the last 400 years. The map of the area is doted with the names of batles ancient and modern.
The destruction of the Loughgall monument shows that antagonisms have not moderated and, while some people feel strongly enough to build a memorial to two dead IRA men, others feel strongly enough to destroy it.
The visit of Boris Johnson to Belfast this week reveals once again the mixture of frivolity and ignorance with which the Brexiteers approach Northern Ireland. A new post-brexit border is supposed to be monitored remotely by yet-to-be discovered technical means. But it should be selfevident that any CCTV or other gadget located on the border in a nationalist/catholic area will be torn down in a few minutes.
Theneutralityofthebritishgovernmentbetween nationalists and unionists was the foundation of the Good Friday Agreement of 1998 that ended thirty years of war in Northern Ireland in which two per cent of the population was killed or injured according to historians of the conflict (the same proportion of casualties in Britain as a whole would have meant 100,000 dead).
Careless of this sanguinary record, Johnson’s approach is entirely opportunistic: he will maintain UK neutrality but he expresses an undying commitment to the union.
He and the new minister for Northern Ireland had a convivial dinner with the DUP leader Arlene Foster, on whom the Conservatives depend for their majority,beforemeetingtheleadersofotherparties.
DUP activists make clear in private that they would like a hard Brexit regardless of economic cost because they want to keep as far from the Irish Republic and as close to Britain as possible.
Supporters of the Good Friday Agreement (GFA) comfort themselves by saying that the Conservatives kowtowing to the DUP will last only as long as they rely on DUP votes in parliament.
This could prove over-optimistic: Johnson leads a hard-right government riding a resurgent wave of English nationalism in which anti-irish sentiment has always had an integral part.