Pilots, aviation experts reject four-member ‘probe team’
ISLAMABAD: Representatives of pilots’ association and aviation experts have expressed concern over the handling of the investigation into the jetliner PK-8303 crash by the air force-dominated probe team appointed by the government.
Pakistan Airlines’ Pilots Association (Palpa) Secretary Capt Imran Narejo said the “investigation team was not balanced,” because it lacked the representation of commercial pilots. Commercial pilots better understood the accidents involving commercial jetliners, he explained.
The federal government appointed a fourmember “investigation team” comprising three officials of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Board, two of whom are Air Force officers, and the fourth member has been co-opted from Pakistan Air Force’s safety board. There is no commercial pilot in the team, which has been asked to submit its findings “within the shortest possible time”.
Another Palpa official, who did not want to be named, said it was crucial for any incident investigation to include a “rated pilot” for the type of the aircraft involved in the accident.
Another senior pilot, who has in the past held senior management positions in PIA, concurred with this view and said that the absence of a pilot with experience on that particular type of aircraft would always remain a handicap for the investigation.
The reservations over the composition of the probe team pertain to their experience, specific knowledge about the crashed jet, and to an extent conflict of interest as a serving Air Marshal from PAF is heading PIA whose internal workings and condition of fleet would also come under question during the investigations.
PIA Chief Executive Office Air Marshal Arshad Malik has emphasised that the passenger plane was flight worthy and crew was adequately trained.
The pilots and aviation experts believe that Palpa, representatives of international pilots’ bodies, and an experienced pilot should have been included in the team to dig out facts and arrive at the right conclusion.
“It’s about preventing such accidents from recurring, irrespective of who is ultimately held responsible,” Capt Narejo insisted.