“Making Sense of Mind Only clarifies how our perceptions are largely driven by unconscious apprehensions that bind us to ideological stances and their ensuing delusions. Outlining a path through our minds’ fabrications, Waldron offers readers access to one of the world’s deepest traditions of working with the mind.”
Description
Through engaging, contemporary examples, Making Sense of Mind Only reveals the Yogacara school of Indian Buddhism as a coherent system of ideas and practices for the path to liberation, contextualizing its key texts and rendering them accessible and relevant.
The Yogacara, or Yoga Practice, school is one of the two schools of Mahayana Buddhism that developed in the early centuries of the common era. Though it arose in India, Mahayana Buddhism now flourishes in China, Tibet, Korea, Vietnam, and Japan. While the other major Mahayana tradition, the Madhyamaka (Middle Way), focuses on the concept of emptiness—that all phenomena lack an intrinsic essence—the Yogacara school focuses on the cognitive processes whereby we impute such essences. Through everyday examples and analogues in cognitive science, author William Waldron makes Yogacara’s core teachings—on the three turnings of the Dharma wheel, the three natures, the storehouse consciousness, and mere perception—accessible to a broad audience. In contrast to the common characterization of Yogacara as philosophical idealism, Waldron presents Yogacara Buddhism on its own terms, as a coherent system of ideas and practices, with dependent arising its guiding principle.
The first half of Making Sense of Mind Only explores the historical context for Yogacara’s development. Waldron examines early Buddhist texts that show how our affective and cognitive processes shape the way objects and worlds appear to us, and how we erroneously grasp onto them as essentially real—perpetuating the habits that bind us to samsara. He then analyzes the early Madhyamaka critique of essences.
This context sets the stage for the book’s second half, an examination of how Yogacara texts such as the Samdhinirmocana Sutra and Asanga’s Stages of Yogic Practice (Yogacarabhumi) build upon these earlier ideas by arguing that our constructive processes also occur unconsciously. Not only do we collectively, yet mostly unknowingly, construct shared realities or cultures, our shared worlds are also mediated through the storehouse consciousness (alayavijñana) functioning as a cultural unconscious. Vasubandhu’s Twenty Verses argues that we can learn to recognize such objects and worlds as “mere perceptions” (vijñaptimatra) and thereby abandon our enchantment with the products of our own cognitive processes. Finally, Maitreya’s Distinguishing Phenomena from Their Ultimate Nature (Dharmadharmatavibhaga) elegantly lays out the Mahayana path to this transformation.
Reviews
“This introduction to Yogacara thought is a remarkable accomplishment: drawing on his decades of work with Yogacara sources, Waldron manages to make Yogacara accessible to those unfamiliar with Buddhist scholastic philosophy while still doing justice to its intellectual, historical, and textual complexities. Waldron’s vivid demonstration of the philosophical subtlety and sophistication of the tradition—both on its own terms and when placed in conversation with contemporary philosophy—is a strong argument for the continued relevance of the medieval Buddhist philosophical tradition.”
“This book is a treasure, a major contribution both to scholars of Buddhist studies and to students of Buddhism who care about doctrine. Professor Waldron explains in lucid prose the historical and doctrinal context of Yogacara as well as its philosophical importance and value for the contemporary philosophy of mind. His account is accurate, rigorous, and profound; the narrative is compelling. You will love this book, and you will learn from it.”
"Waldron helps us discern the value of Yogacara philosophy at this time when cognitive science, developmental psychology, and aspects of physics are becoming aligned with it. Waldron engages both general and scholarly readers, breaking through our habits of being trapped in the subject–object split. I cannot recommend this seminal contribution to contemporary psychology and spirituality too highly.”