Conservation stakeholders urged to improve their capacity to secure funding

Local organisations hamstrung by global finance application processes

African- led groups working directly with local communities are increasingly being recognised as key role players in securing indigenous and community land rights, improving rural livelihoods, conserving nature, and addressing climate change. This came from a recent report on environment management and climate change mitigation efforts dubbed, ‘ Greening the Grassroots: Rethinking African Conservation Funding’. The report indicates that addressing climate change, biodiversity, indigenous and community land rights, and fostering resilient livelihoods in rural communities across Africa depends on action by community- based organisations, and this requires making it easier for community organisations to secure funding.

However, a recurring challenge is that many organisations are hamstrung by the way global conservation finance is set up, particularly with complex requirements and a preference to fund a few larger intermediary international organisations over smaller ones. Globally, indigenous peoples and local community organisations receive less than 1 percent of all climate funding. African entities receive only 5 percent to 10 percent of private philanthropic funding invested in all of Africa. Programme director at Okavango Basin Nature Conservancy Sekgowa Motsumi told this publication that it is important to invest in capacity building for local organisations to chisel their skills and expertise in proposal writing. “We often have people who know what needs to be done but do not know how to compile the data and package the proposal in a way that attracts funders. Those lucky to have access to funding platforms face cumbersome processes that are difficult to translate on the ground,” he said.

Motsumi said that the funding process requires time and effort to go through all the mechanisms, pointing out that it is not all community organisations that have access to funding from international bodies such as USAID and World Bank, among others.

“There is a need for simpler language for conservation organisations to access money, and also need to ensure that funding is bilateral with Government and the processes are streamlined to meet demands in communities.

“I have however noticed that some EU funding equips organisations with resources to build the capacity of local NGOs,” he said. He added that funding platforms should be intentional in their efforts to support local NGOs and ensure that organisations are capacitated to better engage donors.

Project manager at Botswana Network for Climate Change Walter Sikalesele said that competency is critical for locally based organisations, particularly those geared at community- based natural resource management.

“Community- based organisations are not up to the basics to meet the compliance requirements from funders and lack the capability and capacity to manage funds,” he said.

He explained that Botswana has good legislative laws and policies geared at ensuring the country reduces the impacts of climate change, which should back up efforts to improve access to funding, especially since Botswana is a party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and has developed its climate change policy, among other efforts. “Botswana has submitted its Nationally Determined Contributions, a follow- up to the Paris Agreement in 2015, and needs to consider action- based research and devise people- based solutions.”