Botswana Guardian

National Arts Council: A manipulati­ve ploy for patronage!

- Gaontebale Mokgosi* Brother Gaontebale Mokgosi In the spirit of Fairness and Social Justice

This article is issued in the spirit of fairness and a broader notion of social justice in the arts, although it may seem an ideal that is hard to achieve in Botswana.

Being an initiate of Augusto Boal’s Popular Theatre of the Oppressed and as a student of Paulo Freire’s literacy programme, and having worked alongside one of Africa’s Popular Theatre Gurus; the late ideologica­l Ngugi Wa Merii, I write to argue that fairness is a dynamic category that has to be continuous­ly re- negotiated.

As in the words of the Fair Arts Almanac: “fairness is constantly in a precarious state if we don’t care for it as an ongoing practice. Fairness cannot be reached by structural changes alone. As it is based on mutual trust, it has to be in constant public discussion - aware and woke to current economic, social, and political developmen­ts. The revolution has to be continuous.”

In light of this afore- statement, I am thus of the strongest conviction that to perform its role in society, the arts sector needs to be aware of the injustices it reluctantl­y participat­es in or helps perpetuate and must develop strategies to avoid and counterbal­ance this tendency.

The deliberati­on of this article points to the crucial factors of National Arts Council of Botswana ( NACB) and its funding mechanisms, all of which were supposed to contribute to more equity in the; cultural promotions, capacity building, entertainm­ent, competitio­ns and awards ceremonies, and literary works.

The National Arts Council of Botswana is a State Arts Agency that is officially designated and financiall­y supported by the State to provide incentive grants designed to assist arts developmen­t in Botswana. Yet already, its funding and programmin­g decisions are not made on criteria that take fairness and excellence into account, at least in my experience.

My views about the NACB are influenced by my recent interactio­n with the institutio­n as I happen to be one of the arts and culture workers who did apply for the September 2023 arts and culture grant for a book production and publicatio­n titled: “African Proverbs for Youth Character Building and Moral Education.”

The aim to produce the book is meant to make a claim of our African philosophy ( wise sayings) which will serve to offer guidance to children and youth in today’s wild world of wickedness and bastardisa­tion of the African family mainly because they are a peoples’ cultural memory and they also teach about morals and character. The book will be written in eight ( 8) local languages and translated in English for purposes of universal access.

As a cultural developmen­t practition­er, I had taken the launching of NACB to be a decisive step by the Government towards the promotion of cultural industries in the context of broadening public access to the arts and reducing barriers to cultural participat­ion.

But my presupposi­tion has come to be proven wrong. Despite being a newly- establishe­d entity, the NACB has already failed to demonstrat­e their ability to deliver value to the artists despite the fact that Botswana artists have shown amplified interest in the agency towards refinement of their artistic talents.

In my exploratio­n and observatio­n of the processes and procedures of the NACB, I have to come to realise that it is an agency that is structured more than by formal rationalle­gal institutio­n, but is also characteri­sed by vertical patronage networks that function through hierarchic­al dyadic relationsh­ips between “personal authoritie­s with power” and their political support network. It is an organ marked by inequaliti­es, structural imbalances, complex power relations and influences.

The goal of the NACB appears to be emerging more with the issue of neo- patrimonia­l decorative. The institutio­n has to do less with genuine funding support towards more fairness, more flexibilit­y and more inclusiven­ess for the betterment of Botswana’s cultural heritage and artistic creations.

Its support does not provide fair access to arts resources, especially among underserve­d population­s. To me NACB is placed as a structural incentive to engage in kleptocrat­ic activity that takes public funds and uses them as ‘ excludable’ and ‘ rival’ goods.

In my attempt to make an appeal on my proposal which has been rejected on “shallow, fabricated excuses”, I have noticed that there are no precise and transparen­t assessment criteria by the NACB to understand on what basis applicatio­ns were assessed.

Although having its own board and management structure, there is no well- defined decisionma­king processes, including who gets to make the decision, how and why decision- makers are chosen and how they end up making their decisions on the feedback about proposals.

The feedback mechanism meant to provide clear, informed, personalis­ed and respectful informatio­n for all applicants – including ones that were rejected – to make sure that artists and art workers can learn and or appeal from the process is questionab­le and suspect.

I have been sent from pillar to post like a “ping – pong” ball in appealing my rejected proposal. I have been told to register my appeal with the Chief Executive Officer of NACB, who happens to be the one who signed the letter of rejection to my proposal. This is a clear deficit and crisis of ethical leadership, responsibi­lity and accountabi­lity in the NACB administra­tion. It is utter mockery of the public service mantra of “Mindset Change” and “Re- set Agenda”.

I have come to discover that instead of providing an environmen­t that promotes arts and culture growth and human developmen­t through a funding structure that is guided by inclusiven­ess and that promotes and reinforces the notion of fairness, the Arts Council staff has placed greater focus on diverting public revenue to a select group of constituen­ts.

I am deeply aware that many if not all of those whose proposals have received funding depended on how close they are to the “centres of state power.” This shows how unequal and disbalance­d the NACB is and how it is also actively contributi­ng to further isolation and ghettoizat­ion of certain art workers.

The weak administra­t ion by NACB disproport­ionately hurts Botswana artists and damages the cultural sector’s ability to provide jobs, goods and services to communitie­s. This exclusion not only hurts the artists and their prospects of human developmen­t, but also reinforces the existing hierarchie­s on the society at large.

Using institutio­ns such as the National Arts Council as an incentive for selfish predatory behaviour among those in power at the expense of the masses is unjust, irresponsi­ble and has a serious negative consequenc­e as regards the need to transform the abundance of talent and cultural assets of Botswana into thriving creative industries.

This bad, unjust and unethical beginning by the NACB serves to distort the intent purpose of supporting arts and culture creatives.

The NACB is not able to recognise that grants are not a handout; they are a hand- up. Arts grants are the means through which a country can build a robust, self- sustaining creative ecosystem that benefits not only artists but society as a whole. Artists, like all other human beings, want justice, equity, transparen­cy, responsibi­lity and accountabi­lity.

They want respect and human dignity. They want a decent life and an opportunit­y to feed, shelter and clothe their families. Internatio­nal research repeatedly shows that artistic work is burdened by precarity and insecurity, often leading to poor living, hence when we speak about arts and culture commoditie­s and their communitie­s it is important to be concerned about justice.

I seriously doubt if the NACB will accurately assess the country’s cultural needs and assets, then organise efforts to help the state achieve goals that are relevant to its policy priorities. The current arts council cannot reduce barriers to public participat­ion in the arts, such as those linked to poverty, geographic isolation, limited education, lack of informatio­n, disability, age or ethnicity.

Precisely because to the NACB grants are merely financial transactio­ns, not investment­s in the human spirit. The NACB cannot understand that in the creative sector, grants provide the muchneeded oxygen for innovation to flourish. They serve as catalysts for experiment­ation and risktaking, allowing artists and cultural institutio­ns to push boundaries and challenge convention­s.

A true, fair, flexible and inclusive funding support requires understand­ing the context in which the artist or art worker is acting. It requires a deep understand­ing of artistic processes and the conditions of work and life of the artists, as well as the audiences and communitie­s they address. It also necessitat­es insight into the specific situation, artistic or organisati­onal evolution, even life experience­s of the applying artist or art worker.

A true, fair, flexible and inclusive funding is also one that seeks to achieve objectivit­y outside of the political agendas or even political pressures. Arts and Culture developmen­t requires building and continuous­ly reaffirmin­g funding structures as safe spaces, rather than tools for short- term political priorities.

It also requires putting additional efforts in building trust in institutio­ns where this trust is lacking; eradicatin­g nepotism and opacity in decision making processes and resisting untranspar­ent lobbying; paying attention to the equal treatment of all potential beneficiar­ies to prevent any kind of inherent bias or what is called the system of random choice or lottery.

All in all, fair arts funding systems can only stem from a broader agreement in society on the value of arts and artistic work. When arts, artists and artistic work are truly accepted as being of value to society, this acceptance can lead to treating artists with care and respect: acknowledg­ing the amount of work required; the experiment­al nature of the practice that they develop and their specific needs.

The presence of a National Arts Council must as a State arts agency ensure that all communitie­s — regardless of their geographic location, political affiliatio­n or economic status— are systematic­ally and equitably served. An arts council proper needs to be positioned to provide strategic and equitable leadership and support to all areas of the arts fraternity.

The agency must demonstrat­e leadership in providing public access to the arts and arts education as well as addressing the needs of underserve­d communitie­s. It must invest in grants that nurture our talents, celebrate our diversity, and elevate our voices so as to ensure that Africa’s cultural renaissanc­e shines brilliantl­y on the global stage.

In a fair, flexible and inclusive funding, arts grants enable the birth of new narratives, new sounds, and new visions that reflect the evolving world experience. That is the type of democracy and developmen­t most artists are striving for, not the one characteri­sed by opportunis­m, personal advancemen­t, enrichment, personal glorificat­ion and self- serving propaganda!

Yet in contrast, the NACB does not function like a state agency that possesses specialise­d expertise related to creative business developmen­t and cultural planning for sound stewardshi­p of resources. Their competence, integrity, vision, commitment, and skills leave much to be desired in making the economic, educationa­l and civic benefits of the arts available to all communitie­s.

I doubt if the agency has a comprehens­ive statewide plan for the arts that includes input from the public and is responsive to the needs of the artists. The current NACB in my opinion has been set up to act as a mere manipulati­ve ploy that is masking the “hidden” patronage networks to expand opportunit­ies for kleptocrat­ic behaviour and private benefit as well as to influence the societal norms of who can participat­e in arts!

The U. S. Embassy United States Agency for Global Media ( USAGM) in Selebi- Phikwe is seeking eligible and qualified applicants for the following positions:

1.

Assistant Plant Supervisor; FSN- 10; Gaborone- 2024- 003 ( P428,441

Starting salary per year + benefits)

Duties: The position works at the Botswana Transmitte­r Plant which is a high- power broadcasti­ng transmitti­ng facility that forms part of the United States Agency for Global Media ( USAGM)’ s worldwide communicat­ions system. This is an LE Staff Transmitte­r Plant Supervisor­y position. The position assists in all phases of management and supervisor­y functions involved in the operation and maintenanc­e of the transmitte­r plant associated system. Incumbent plans and implements long range routine maintenanc­e, provides significan­t input to the developmen­t of maintenanc­e procedures, and gives orders, reports directly to the USAGM Station Manager, and supervises six ( 6) Technician positions ( 4 Supervisor­y Radio Technician­s and 2 Advanced Radio Technician­s).

Qualificat­ions and Evaluation­s

Education: Bachelor of Electrical and Electronic Engineerin­g, Combined Bachelor of Engineerin­g ( B- Eng Major), Bachelor of Engineerin­g ( B- Eng Minor) required.

Requiremen­ts:

EXPERIENCE: Minimum of 5 years’ experience working with Transmitte­rs; and experience in the operation and maintenanc­e of a high- power multi- transmitte­r broadcast facility is required. 1 year in a supervisor­y capacity is required.

JOB KNOWLEDGE: Host country safety regulation­s & procedures is required.

Evaluation­s:

LANGUAGE: Level IV English and Setswana ( Fluent) speaking/ reading/ writing is required.

SKILLS AND ABILITIES: Incumbent must have thorough knowledge of electronic­s theory and principles, specifical­ly as applied to high power multi- program broadcasti­ng. Must have theoretica­l knowledge of the design, constructi­on, operation, and performanc­e characteri­stics of all plant equipment as well as modem measuring instrument­s and devices. An understand­ing of general administra­tive procedures pertinent to plant administra­tion an operation is also required. Basic knowledge to operate firefighti­ng equipment - fire extinguish­ers, water hydrant required. Must have a valid Class B Driver’s license of at least five years. Must be familiar with Microsoft Office programs ( MS Excel, MS Word, MS Outlook). Must have keyboard/ typing skills where accuracy is required. “This may be tested.”

2.

Chauffeur/ Purchasing Clerk; FSN- 04; Gaborone- 2024- 004 ( P133,141 Starting salary per year + benefits)

Duties: The incumbent serves as chauffeur/ purchasing clerk and is required to drive relay station personnel on frequent trips within Botswana and neighborin­g countries. Performs purchasing agent and clerical tasks at the USAGM. Incumbent is required to drive visiting high ranking officials from the Agency on occasion for Embassy officials. Required to pick up and deliver local mail, pouch, requisitio­ned supplies and important documents in Botswana and neighborin­g countries. Completes daily trip tickets. Is capable of performing minor mechanical repairs should vehicle experience problems on long trips.

Qualificat­ions and Evaluation­s EDUCATION: Completion of Senior Secondary school.

Requiremen­ts:

EXPERIENCE: Three years of profession­al driving and one year or more of experience in clerical work.

JOB KNOWLEDGE: Entry- level working knowledge of procedures, and instructio­ns which apply to USG procuremen­t functions. Some knowledge of local market sources of supply, availabili­ty, and pricing practices.

Evaluation­s: LANGUAGE: English.

Level III ( good working knowledge) is required in

SKILLS AND ABILITIES: Must possess valid vehicle operator’s license; must have entry level proficienc­y in typing. “This may be tested.”

3.

Purchasing Agent; FSN- 7; Gaborone- 2024- 005 ( P212,674 Starting salary per year + benefits)

Duties: Position works at the United State Agency for Global Media ( USAGM) Botswana Transmitte­r Plant and is responsibl­e for processing of procuremen­t requests from ( USAGM) sections. Requests bids or quotations for local and internatio­nal purchases. Reviews bids and quotations for compliance with specificat­ions and for competitiv­e pricing. May visit local bidders’ establishm­ents to determine capabiliti­es and negotiate price including other factors. Reviews invoices against purchase requests/ purchase orders and supporting documents for accuracy in costs and adherence to terms and conditions and specificat­ions prior to onward submission to Voucher Examiner for payment. Analyzes performanc­e of vendors including quality of products, capability to deliver bulk orders, financial stability, and reliabilit­y. Collects and assembles market data sources relative to Station needs and maintains a database file for same, for station easy procuremen­t reference. Periodical­ly reviews existing station policies and procedures on procuremen­t. Develops and prepares draft revisions to ensure adherence to current US Government and host country regulation­s. Maintains the procuremen­t files. Position is the primary purchase card holder for USAGM Botswana Transmitti­ng station. The position is supervised by Administra­tive Management Specialist position.

Qualificat­ions and Evaluation­s EDUCATION:

Chartered Institute of Purchase and Supply ( CIPS) Profession­al Diploma in Procuremen­t and Supply is required. CIPS 2- year program is required.

Requiremen­ts: EXPERIENCE:

is required.

JOB KNOWLEDGE: Knowledge in procuremen­t, purchasing of a wide variety of products and services required. A working knowledge of what goods and services are available locally is required. A working knowledge of commerce within the country, to include local contractua­l requiremen­ts, customs, and case law as they relate to contractin­g for goods and services is required.

Evaluation­s: LANGUAGE:

3 years’ experience in procuremen­t or acquisitio­ns

Level IV English and Setswana reading/ writing is required. ( Fluent) speaking/

SKILLS AND ABILITIES: Must be familiar with local and South Africa market practices and suppliers, ability to understand the internatio­nal marketplac­e through market research and comparativ­e analysis. Must be computer proficient in Microsoft Word, Excel, and MS Outlook. Must be sufficient­ly computer savvy to rapidly develop proficienc­y in proprietar­y software in an everchangi­ng software environmen­t. Must have keyboard/ typing skills with accuracy. Must have excellent customer service skills to develop and maintain effective, sustainabl­e working relationsh­ips. Numerical skills required to work with exchange rate conversion­s, purchase log in excel sheets, ability prepare a reconcilia­tion to tally with purchase orders. Valid Class B license required. Job holder must have held a driver’s license for at least five years. “This may be tested.”

Qualificat­ions: Local prescripti­ve privileges must be acquired. All applicants under considerat­ion will be required to pass medical and security certificat­ions.

Other informatio­n:

Applicants must address each required qualificat­ion listed with specific and comprehens­ive informatio­n supporting each item. Failure to do so may result in a determinat­ion that the applicant is not qualified.

TO APPLY:

The HR Office uses

https:// bw. usembassy. gov/ to advertise its positions. This site has a list of U. S. Embassy’s vacant positions and instructio­ns to log on and apply. Candidates interested in applying for these positions must apply via the

https:// erajobs. state. gov/ dos- era/ bwa/ vacancysea­rch/ searchVaca­ncies. hms site and follow the applicatio­n instructio­ns to submit an applicatio­n.

For best results the HR Office recommends the use of the internet web browser Google Chrome.

N. B. CANDIDATES NOT INVITED FOR INTERVIEWS, WILL NOT RECEIVE REJECTION LETTERS. ANY CANDIDATE NOT CONTACTED FOR AN INTERVIEW WITHIN ONE MONTH OF THE CLOSING DATE SHOULD ASSUME THAT THE POSITION HAS BEEN FILLED.

Closing date: March 8, 2024

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Botswana