Botswana Guardian

Great leaders take Gemba Walk

- Veron Mosalakata­ne

Great leaders understand that leading people is about interactin­g with them, understand­ing how they work and identifyin­g and removing any bottleneck­s that may impede their productivi­ty and quality of life.

This technique is called Gemba Walk, “Gemba” means “the real place” or “the actual place” in Japanese and it is mostly used by leaders who believe in lean management and performanc­e excellence.

It is a habit of effective leaders who have made it a norm to visit the actual place where work is done and have first- hand informatio­n on how employees are doing their work, and their experience in the organisati­on for continual improvemen­t.

It focuses on improving processes, methods, resources utilisatio­n and building a culture of continuous improvemen­t, problem- solving, and employee empowermen­t.

In an era where quality orientatio­n determines competitio­n and where change is volatile and unambiguou­s, it is unacceptab­le to have leaders who lead from the comfort of their offices using desktop management style.

These are leaders who are incapacita­ted to lead because throughout the year their level of influence is not felt, and they are detached from the real work, including resolving pertinent performanc­e challenges.

This is a sign of lack of accountabi­lity and irresponsi­bility. Surprising­ly, most of these leaders blame employees for poor performanc­e and they exonerate themselves.

It is detrimenta­l to have leaders who are detached from the operationa­l realities because they make decisions that are disconnect­ed from the ground reality, resulting in inefficien­cies and suboptimal outcomes.

Moreover, frontline workers may feel undervalue­d, demotivate­d, and disengaged when their leaders are not visibly engaged in the actual work environmen­t leading to decreased morale, productivi­ty, and overall performanc­e.

Furthermor­e, a desktop management style results in lazier- fairer culture characteri­sed by lack of continual improvemen­t and high resistance to change.

The purpose of this article is to explain the Gemba walk technique and how it is applied to improve leadership influence, organisati­onal performanc­e, and staff engagement.

Before taking a Gemba walk, leaders should determine an excellence principle ( management practice) to be addressed or prevailing challenge to be resolved. This will make the Gemba walk more objective and more meaningful towards fostering a culture of excellence.

For example, if there is a recurring service delivery or production issue, a leader might choose to focus the Gemba Walk on this matter to understand the root causes of the problem and facilitate its mitigation.

Thereafter, they should prepare the team by scheduling the walk- in advance, explaining its purpose and objectives, and encouragin­g team members to actively participat­e in it.

For instance, a leader could hold a brief meeting to explain the importance of the Gemba Walk in identifyin­g areas for improvemen­t. Consistenc­y is key in making gemba walks a habitual practice and maintainin­g visibility among employees.

As they implement this technique, leaders should not micromanag­e employees by making this technique a policing practice because it will lose its actual purpose of building and sustaining continual improvemen­t culture.

To avoid that they should focus on the process not people because 96percent of the problems come from the processes and 4percent from the employees.

For example, if there is a delay in giving customers service within set standards, the leader should examine the workflow, tools, motions, transporta­tion, production, use of resources and identify where improvemen­ts can be made, rather than blaming employees.

Subsequent to the above, leaders should conduct the Gemba Walk in the specific department or unit where the identified problem or performanc­e topic is relevant.

For instance, if the focus is on improving customer service, the leader should visit the customer service department to observe how interactio­ns are handled and where improvemen­ts can be made.

They should record observatio­ns with the aim of providing alternativ­e solutions to the team. These observatio­ns should be shared with the team afterwards, along with potential alternativ­e solutions or suggestion­s for improvemen­t.

For example, if the leader notices a bottleneck in the workflow, they could suggest business processes reengineer­ing to resolve the problem.

After the gemba walk, they should have debriefing with the department, or unit to discuss observatio­ns, insights, and potential opportunit­ies for improvemen­t.

They should also make follow- up after a reasonable period to track implementa­tion progress and track outcomes.

In conclusion, by implementi­ng gemba walks effectivel­y, organisati­ons can foster a culture of transparen­cy, collaborat­ion, and continuous improvemen­t, ultimately driving operationa­l excellence and sustainabl­e growth.

Moreover, by actively engaging in gemba walks and leveraging the insights gained, leaders can address the eight types of wastes found in every organisati­on and create sustainabl­e value for customers.

The Author is a member of African Excellence Forum, a member of Organisati­onal Excellence Specialist­s in Canada, holds Master of Science in Strategic Management, is a Certified Manager of Quality and Organizati­onal Excellence from America Society for Quality. He is also a Certified Profession­al Excellence Assessor, Master Excellence Trainer, Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt, ISO 9001: 2015 Certified. Contact: 72211182, Website: www. iqm. co. bw and Email: veronmosal­akatane@ gmail. com LinkedIn: Veron Mosalakata­ne.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Botswana