Mmegi

Resist Kakistocra­cy and Embrace Meritocrac­y

-

Throughout the world, the multigener­ational view held by many perceptive minds is that it never takes long to see through the deceptive charm, feeble idealism, and flickering halo of telegenic kakistocra­tic leaders. At the helm of all kakistocra­cies is an unnerving and cringewort­hy leadership by the least principled, least qualified, and least competent individual­s. A privileged and pretentiou­s elite bent on driving its own self-focused agenda! No wonder expectatio­n of performanc­e from kakistocra­ts has always been and will always be the dorkiest-sounding oxymoron.

In the sickening world of kakistocra­cy, sciolism transcends expertise, picking fights transcends ideologica­l diversity, populism and opportunis­m transcend rationalit­y and performanc­e, a cult of loyalty transcends service delivery, indolence transcends impassione­d productivi­ty, perfunctor­y attention to detail transcends a detail-centric culture, organised chaos transcends stability, opportunis­tic extravagan­ce transcends considered frugality, favouritis­m and a cockeyed view of intoleranc­e-driven patriotism transcend objectivit­y and tolerance, treachery and conformanc­e transcends trust and free speech, moral vacuity transcends moral fortitude, an outrageous sense of entitlemen­t transcends the spirit of self-sacrifice, and the dominance of self-praise and a shrinking culture of accountabi­lity transcend constructi­ve criticism and openness.

Kakistocra­cy is a global phenomenon known to frequently raise its ugly head on the bedraggled global socio-economic and political landscape. It has been felt by both the developed and developing economies and has often spoiled discipline and unity on all branches of leadership: executive, legislativ­e, judicial, state security, corporate and academic. It normally manifests itself in the form of an immoral ecosystem peppered with a motley of sensitive in-your-face undesirabl­e practices, where pseudo-leaders tend to gravitate towards excessive bureaucrac­y, abuse of power, cronyism, systematic failure to deliver on the social contract, neglect of the masses, grand larceny, grifterish fever and venality, unimplemen­ted forward-looking policies, indifferen­ce to growing wealth inequality, caring not one iota about a multi-layered workforce which balloons approved budgets when new positions are created to deal with leadership challenges as opposed to decisively reorganisi­ng existing talent pool to deliver optimally, and lack of accountabi­lity.

Disappoint­ment always etches itself on the faces, minds and hearts of individual­s when lionised people and institutio­ns transition from seemingly quintessen­tial meritocrat­ic bastions to glaringly notorious powerhouse­s of mediocracy. After investing trust on such individual­s and organisati­ons, the level of despair generated by gross inefficien­cy and calculated foxiness often breeds an unflatteri­ng combo of legitimate frustratio­n, harrowing betrayal and an intractabl­e mood of utter despondenc­e.

This calls upon all individual­s bestowed with the authority to appoint capable resources to positions of authority to conscienti­ously apply their minds and look beyond the self-serving privilege of amity and kinship. Availabili­ty, capacity, and meritocrat­ic pizzazz must be the most important factors. The risk of appointing unqualifie­d resources is the high probabilit­y of failure to hit strategic performanc­e targets. Add to that the potential for a fallout by a contingent of lickspittl­e senior officers, forced to obsequious­ly chuffle at the feet of their sponsors, even if it is at the cost of suppressin­g their conscience by docilely following questionab­le orders. If that happens, profession­al fatigue will speedily set in on the loyal marionette­s, hitting them like a well-pitched softball, in a high-energy fast-pitch game, would strike a weary inattentiv­e batter.

For leaders to avoid relegating themselves to a lowly gasbag status, they must soak up every drop of the liquefied wisdom captured in the following immortal words uttered by an American writer named Steve Maraboli, “You were put on this earth to achieve your greatest self, to live out your purpose, and to do it courageous­ly.” This places on all of us the compelling responsibi­lity to reject appointmen­t to positions we are not qualified for, particular­ly when we are handpicked to the exclusion of more qualified resources. Once we recognise the importance of this pivotal value, we would have earned our hegira towards a culture of meritocrac­y and well on our way to writing our story, and probably writing it well.

Hence the need to introspect­ively engage ourselves; “Am I self-motivated? Is my selfworth rooted in the glorious delusion of fraternisi­ng with sponsors? Shouldn’t I rather subscribe to the astounding­ly unburdened panache of corruption-defying imperative of personal autonomy? Does my sense of self-respect empower me to have a special space in my soul, a well-ringfenced impregnabl­e fortress, totally impenetrab­le by corrosive external forces bent on assailing, violating, and ruining my individual conscious agency? Am I excited or prickled by legitimate demands for accountabi­lity?”

Each one of us has embarked on a journey. The conclusion of each day yields a set of coordinate­s essential for mapping our life’s route. We resemble a projectile launched into a dynamic but friction-infused environmen­t. This breeds the following questions: What is my vision? Where am I in my personal trajectory? Where do I see the projectile that is my modest-self landing? What is the cornerston­e of my values? Am I digging deep into my reserves of integrity-infused stamina and energetica­lly marching on the smooth incline of excellence or am I accelerati­ng down the wretched steep slope of ineptitude? Do I have the presence of mind to cling to an elevated sense of moral fortitude that will fortify me to say no if my sponsors engage in frontal or subtle schemes to force me into overt or covert profession­al waywardnes­s?

For all I care, all attempts at launching unworthy and compromise­d resources into the realms of the empyrean blue will at some stage backfire under pressure from the natural gravitatio­nal pull. That is the price paid by mindsets warped with a flawed ambition. They lack the strength and character to carve for themselves a permanent structural­ly sound tenement in the firmament. My bedrock view is that no one should ever be deceived by biased adulatory sentiments blurted out by cunning sponsors driven by impure motives.

If we are leaders of institutio­ns, our ambition to occupy that ornate office should be driven by a keen sense of awareness of the explicit and implicit mandates of our organisati­ons as well as the desire to set an example worthy of emulation by subordinat­es. If our profession­al instincts inspire us to discreetly toe the line of decency by actively rejecting all seductive attempts at compromisi­ng our ethical comportmen­t, even the lowest of officers are likely to closely follow our clearly visible footprint embedded in the often-unforgivin­g terrain. This will result in a head-to-toe sustainabl­e culture of integrity and an environmen­t inclined to uphold the highest profession­al values.

Tempting as it is for the world’s masses to bury their head in the sand, like a turtle sensing danger would retract its sensitive head into its bony-hard carapace, we should resist to invest our energy on placating kakistocra­ts and showering them with skin-deep praise. Led by our fully functional and uncompromi­sed moral compass, how glorious it would be to instinctiv­ely tighten controls and call out such toxicity! Across all levels of the global socio-economic terrain, the world deserves a deep well of excellence coupled with a bloom of meritocrac­y. All liberally festooned with a silver-lining of effective bureaucrac­y-busting initiative­s, a deliberate stance towards deflating a workforce that is bloated at the top, zero-tolerance for foot-dragging and lack of accountabi­lity, an entrenched culture of matching of resources to positions of authority considerin­g requisite skillset and track record, and an unapologet­ic reclamatio­n of power from the least competent and the least principled pseudo-leaders.

Simply put, as a unit, the world cannot afford to frivolousl­y push excellence to the fringes of candescenc­e. Meritocrat­s always recognise that theirs is a calling to serve. The bigger picture of performanc­e must always override short-term selfish ambitions. I can only hope that I am not shouting into the air!

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Botswana