Mmegi

Sixteen villages in North-East water scheme remain thirsty

● contractor denies responsibi­lity

- MONKAGEDI GAOTLHOBOG­WE Staff Writer

At least 16 of the 52 villages in the North East and Tutume Sub district are not benefiting from the P200 million water scheme commission­ed last November by Unik Constructi­on.

Unik Constructi­on General Manager, Yun Sun says his company has done a fantastic job upgrading the infrastruc­ture as required, and that it never failed.

With the current water supply of 14ML/day projected to be above the computed water demand of about 7.5 ML/day used for the design of the scheme, dry pipes in 16 vilages has become a disturbing feature since the project was commission­ed, forcing authoritie­s to look for alternativ­es to water the villages.

Mmegi has it on good authority that following the discovery of the shortfall, a meeting was convened in Francistow­n Water Utilities Corporatio­n office on July 7 with the Project Team and the Business Centre Team, followed by a site visit to strategic project sites (Masingwane­ng Plant and Chilokoti Tank), to appreciate the challenges facing the project.

The 16 villages missing out on the water scheme include five from Tutume Sub District namely, Senete, Changate, Dagwi, Nkange and Maitengwe, all of which are now supplied from the Maitengwe wellfields, resulting in interrupte­d supplies that have become common in the villages.

In North East District, intermitte­nt water supply challenges continue to be experience­d in six villages comprising Masukwane, Jackalas No. 1, Butale, Senyawe, Siviya and Themashang­a.

Furthermor­e the village of Butale and Siviya are also supplied from boreholes while at Moroka village a conjunctiv­e use of resources has been considered to augment water supply in the area, Mmegi can reveal. An internal report reveals that the combined estimated water demand for the two districts, almost exceeds supply despite the project design spanning over a 20-year horizon.

On the other hand, water sales report shows that about half of water production is billed in any given month , meaning that only half of the water intended to reach customers is billed in any given month while another half is unaccounte­d for, atleast by end of March 2022.

North East, Tutume Scheme

Water Supply Challenges: According to documents seen by Mmegi, Mbalambi storage tanks (both 6.8 ML and 1.5ML Storage Capacity) are unable to meet the demand for both North East District and Tutume Sub District villages expected to benefit from the scheme.

Due to the above stated reason, the commission­ing of the water supply from Mbalambi via Tutume to Senete-Maitengwe cluster villages has not been realised. The water could only reach Senete village, which is nearer Tutume.

Further there is insufficie­nt storage at Moroka Concrete Tank to supply villages on the eastern part of the North East District.

According to documents, the pumps at Mbalambi are rated at 108l/hr, each with a maximum daily supply of 5.2 ML/day, which are attainable only if two pumps are in service for 24hrs with minimum interrupti­on. Meanwhile, the estimated demand for villages downstream of Mbalambi tank is 4.2ML/ day, however, due to intermitte­nt operation of pumps, the maximum output remains farfetched as tank levels have a direct bearing on pumping philosophy.

Power outages cripple Kalakamati pump station:

The scheme is also marred by power supply challenges for Kalakamati pumps (2 duty and one standby) resulting in use of genset during peak hours, Mmegi can reveal. This follows a project which was commission­ed by BPC in Feb/March 2022, but thereafter experience­d system shortfall/instabilit­y and it was taken offline for remedial works.

BPC is currently upgrading their substation at Sebina to ensure a security of supply to this pump station, according to the document which further opines that this snag impacts the availabili­ty of two duty pumps during operation.

The pump station feeds water to Mbalambi Tank, which is currently operating below capacity as a result of the challenges faced by the Kalakamati pumps.

Mmegi can further reveal that the scheme is also unable to realise enough water flows from Moroka pump station that simultaneo­usly feeds the villages of Senyawe, Butale, Ramokgweba­na and Jack No. 1. The four villages can only realise water supply by augmenting with supplies from village boreholes or through water supply rationing, according to the document seen by Mmegi.

Despite the installati­on of dedicated pumps that should ensure adequate water supply to the above mentioned areas, the report says the pump system has not met its intended objective since the pump station was commission­ed.

The document further seems to fault the project management consultant­s and contractor as somewhere it says equipment performanc­e testing and optimisati­on of the scheme was not carried out during commission­ing. “Due to this project flaws, it is evident that some of deficienci­es experience­d now could have been addressed during the exercise and to ensure optimal benefits of the scheme are realised.”

But Unik Constructi­on Engineerin­g General Manager, Yun Sun vehemently disagrees that his equipment performanc­e testing and optimisati­on was not carried out.

He says it is a requiremen­t that every equipment procured goes through the F.E.T process, and that the project consultant sees to that.

Yun acknowledg­es that his company is currently doing some remedial works on the scheme, but says those remedial works are limited to telemetry issues at a couple of sites.

The Unik Constructi­on General Manager further says his company upgraded 13 tanks, among others, and was not responsibl­e for the distributi­on of water.

“The electricit­y challenges which seem to be affecting the performanc­e of tanks and delivery of water to villages, only the BPC can resolve that. We were not responsibl­e for that aspect of the project. We cannot answer for the water distributi­on challenges on the scheme that was not our area,” Yun told Mmegi.

On the issue of the commission­ed scheme still running short of satisfying the region’s water demands despite the upgrade, Yun says his company was given specific tanks and pumps to upgrade to a certain capacity, which they satisfied without fail, adding that if more capacity outside what was given is needed, Unik Constructi­on will be willing to engage.“

For his part, Water Utilities Corporatio­n (WUC) Technical Services Director, Mtshambiwa Moathodi said the contractor remains to monitor all the new infrastruc­ture until the end of the defect liability period.

However, the WUC official defended the new infrastruc­ture at the North East and Tutume Sub District, saying they were designed to meet the projected year 2040 demand.

This is despite a post comissioni­ng findings that the water scheme upgrades designs may have drasticall­y under estimated the water demands of the region.

So serious is the problem that two new treatment plants have been proposed for the scheme in the next financial year as a response to the shortcomin­gs of the current water scheme.

 ?? PIC: CONSTRUCTI­ONREVIEWON­LINE.COM ?? Waterpipe
PIC: CONSTRUCTI­ONREVIEWON­LINE.COM Waterpipe

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Botswana