The Super League’s provocative offshoot:
Of the many threats levied by politicians and soccer powerbrokers to prevent a breakaway Super League, which now appears likely to materialize amid ferocious backlash, the most fascinating came from FIFA months ago.
Global soccer’s governing body has been relatively quiet since Sunday’s bombshell. But back in January, in response to speculation about a Super League, it floated its nuclear option.
“Any club or player involved in such a competition would, as a consequence, not be allowed to participate in any competition organized by FIFA or their respective confederation,” FIFA said.
Those competitions, of course, include the grandest sporting event on earth, the World Cup.
FIFA’s warning relies on a serpentine string of logic. FIFA doesn’t want this Super League to happen. If playing in it disqualifies stars from the World Cup, the reasoning goes, stars would shun the Super League. The league’s commercial potential would be considerably weakened. Perhaps so much so that its founders would think twice about creating it.
But within that logic are provocative questions: Would stars really prioritize FIFA’s showpiece? Or might they choose the Super League? How much does the modern player actually value the World Cup? Super League or World Cup? Decades ago, in the age of Pele or even Maradona, the answer to those questions would have been exceedingly obvious. Pele, for years, was considered the greatest ever despite never competing against the sport’s greatest clubs. Legends were born and raised at World Cups. Careers were structured around them above all else.
But this, now, is a different age. The Champions League, English Premier League and Spanish La Liga are remarkably visible around the globe. The salaries their teams can pay, the result of gargantuan commercial and broadcast contracts, are lucrative. The platforms they offer are enormous.
In fact, the three most popular players of this current era, Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo and Neymar, have built their legends almost exclusively with their clubs. They’ve mostly underwhelmed at World Cups. But they’ve won prestigious trophies, and made billions of dollars, and accumulated hundreds of millions of followers because they’ve showcased their talents annually, more consistently, on soccer’s second-biggest stage.
They have sweat and bled and cried for their countries. But they’ve given more to, and been given more opportunities by, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Manchester United, PSG and Juventus.
The Super League, in a way, could become a referendum on the World Cup. It would reveal that the sport’s banner event isn’t as colossal as it once was – not because it’s any less exciting, but because exciting soccer is more prevalent and watchable in the interim.
The threat, in the end, would be empty. The World Cup will go on, with the sport’s biggest stars, as it always has. FIFA will profit, as it always has. It just won’t be able to stop a group of elite clubs from snatching control of soccer’s professional riches.