The Monitor (Botswana)

Police Want Ralotsia’s ‘Evidence’ In Hemp Case

- Innocent Selatlhwa Staff Writer

Former Minister of Agricultur­al Developmen­t and Food Security, Patrick Ralotsia wants a case in which the Botswana Police Service (BPS) is investigat­ing hemp or dagga ‘farming’ at his Kanngwe farm to be thrown out.

Ralotsia is caught up in the investigat­ion, as BPS wants him to produce ‘evidence’ in the dagga case.

Police have instructed Ralotsia to produce a Lease Agreement entered into between himself and Fresh Standard (Pty) Ltd and have it presented it to senior Superinten­dent Moatlhodi Ntuane.

BPS also wants Ralotsia to provide any other document that may be necessary in the investigat­ion of the unlawful cultivatio­n of 32 dagga plants at Kanngwe farm, allegedly for narcotic or psychotrop­ic purposes that Fresh Standard planted.

A rule nisi was granted to BPS early September after an ex parte applicatio­n was made by BPS and was to be reviewed on September 18, but to date the matter is yet to be argued.

In his affidavit, Ntuane states that he needs the informatio­n from Ralotsia for the purposes of investigat­ions and or any other informatio­n that will assist in establishi­ng the lawful ownership of the farm.

According to court papers, Ralotsia’s attorney, Kgosietsil­e Ngakaagae will raise points in limine arguing that the order prayed for by the applicant is overly broad and lacks specificit­y to be capable of both comprehens­ion and compliance.

He further argues that Ralotsia has not been served with founding papers, let alone the court record, on the basis of which the rule nisi was obtained.

He will also argue that the BPS choice of process, an ex parte applicatio­n, is not an appropriat­e process for the applicatio­n and constitute­s abuse of process.

“The essence of the order, as ought, would be to compel Ralotsia to help the police to investigat­e himself. That violates his right against self- incriminat­ion. The sought order, infringes upon Ralotsia’s right to silence, and further offends the judge’s rule. The applicatio­n lacks statutory basis. It does not find anchorage, on any provision of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act, or any other law,” read the court papers.

Ngakaagae wants the rule nisi be discharged, the applicatio­n be dismissed and for the BPS to pay cost of applicatio­n on Attorney-Client Scale.

Ngakaagae on Friday expressed displeasur­e at the drag of the matter, as Ntuane was not in court, said to be on quarantine after one of his colleagues tested positive to the coronaviru­s.

He argued that the State should have asked someone to stand in for Ntuane for the matter to progress as the case is causing costs, anxiety and continuing embarrassm­ent to his client. The matter will be heard in a fortnight.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Botswana