The Phnom Penh Post

Chimps see butts like we do faces: researcher­s

- Karin Brulliard

MUCH of the headline-grabbing research about chimpanzee­s, humans’ closest animal relatives, is framed in terms of how good chimps are at doing things we do. Well, here’s a new finding on something those great apes trounce us at: Recognisin­g each other’s butts.

They’re good at this in the same way we people are at recognisin­g individual faces. Unlike other common objects, we tell one face from another in a holistic way, processing the eyes, nose, lips and other features together. When we see images of faces turned upside-down, we’re disproport­ionately worse at recognisin­g them than we are at recognisin­g, say, a flipped car.

This is called the “inversion effect”,and the authors of a new study in PLOS One found that chimpanzee­s have it when it comes to buttocks.

It was already known that chimps sometimes demonstrat­e an inversion effect with faces and bodies. But the researcher­s, based in the Netherland­s and Japan, spotted a gap in the literature: “Previous studies included almost all body parts, except the most obvious one, which is the behind.”

Why would this be obvious? Because rear ends serve a big purpose in the chimp world. Female chimps’ buttocks grow redder and swollen when they are ovulating, signalling to males that it’s business time. And it’s important to know whose bottom it is, in part to prevent inbreeding. The buttocks have, in scientific parlance, a “high socio-sexual signaling function”.

But when we began walking upright, our bottoms became fleshier and no longer broadcast our ovulation status, possibly to discourage casual hookups in favour of pairing up and sticking together for the children’s sake. On the other hand, humans – “especially females”, the researcher­s write – developed ruddier and thicker lips, as well as fattier faces.

Bottoms and faces are both symmetrica l, t hey add, and interpreti­ng what a butt is say ing is crucia l to chimpanzee­s’ reproducti­ve success, just as interpreti ng facia l messag i ng i s i mporta nt to human mating.

“Thus,” the authors write, “human fac- es share important features with the ancient primate behind.”

So their hypothesis was that the inversion effect would hit chimpanzee­s harder when it came to buttocks. And in tests - which involved 100 people and five chimpanzee­s who matched images and inverted images of human and primate faces, buttocks and feet – they found this to be the case. The humans struggled more to match upside-down faces than rear ends. The chimpanzee­s had the opposite problem, which suggests they process images of buttocks the way we do faces.

The researcher­s say it also suggests that when we began walking, our recognitio­n abilities moved from the “bottom up” – that is, that our facial identifyin­g skills evolved out of an ancient ability to recognise specific buttocks.

“The findings suggest an evolutiona­ry shift in socio-sexual signaling function from behinds to faces, two hairless, symmetrica­l and attractive body parts,” the authors wrote, “which might have attuned the human brain to process faces, and the human face to become more behindlike.”

 ?? CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY VIA THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Washoe, one of five chimpanzee­s at Central Washington University’s Chimpanzee and Human Communicat­ion Institute. Researcher­s say our closest animal relatives beat us at recognisin­g individual butts.
CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY VIA THE NEW YORK TIMES Washoe, one of five chimpanzee­s at Central Washington University’s Chimpanzee and Human Communicat­ion Institute. Researcher­s say our closest animal relatives beat us at recognisin­g individual butts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Cambodia