Asia animal farms fuel illegal trade
River from Thailand. It’s called the Golden Triangle Special Economic Zone.
Most businesses in the duty-free complex are owned and staffed by Chinese citizens and patronised by a predominantly Chinese clientele. Many are drawn here by the promise of vices not as easily found back home, including products made from exotic animals like tigers.
Conservationists maintain that this zoo is actually a farm raising animals for slaughter, and that it plays a significant role in perpetuating the illegal wildlife trade, swapping tigers with similar operations in Thailand and illegally butchering animals for their bones, meat and parts.
Tigers, bears, snakes and countless other species, many endangered, are held on farms throughout Southeast Asia. Operators illegally capture animals in the wild and then pass them off as captive-bred, or breed the animals on site and illegally sell them into the trade.
These facilities are part of a contraband industry whose profitability by some estimates is surpassed only by the global trade in drugs and arms, and by human trafficking.
Few tourists were present at Kings Romans during a recent visit. The ghosttown feel was reinforced by boarded-up shops, half-finished construction sites and posters advertising events that had long since come and gone.
But restaurants at Kings Romans still offered expensive plates of bear paw, pangolin (an endangered scaly mammal) and sautéed tiger meat, which can be paired with tiger wine, a grainbased concoction in which the cats’ penises, bones or entire skeletons are soaked for months.
When a group of foreigners showed up at the God of Wealth, Kings Romans’ fanciest restaurant, the suspicious proprietor told their translator, “You can eat here, but do not ask for the special jungle menu” – the menu offering wildlife options.
Nevertheless, the staff offered tiger wine for $20 a shot glass, and served a bear’s paw to patrons at a nearby table. In May, a photographer for the New York Times who visited the restaurant was offered plates of tiger meat for $45.
“The place is just a mess,” said Debbie Banks, of the nonprofit Environmental Investigation Agency in London. “Pretty much anything goes.”
In 2015, Banks and her colleagues, along with the nonprofit group Education for Nature-Vietnam, reported that meals, medicine and jewellery made from numerous protected species – including tigers, leopards, rhinoceroses, bears and elephants – were openly sold in the special economic zone.
Their documentation spurred the Lao government to raid some businesses here and to burn a few tiger skins on television. But Banks said little had changed since that “cosmetic effort”.
Like the rest of the complex, the Kings Romans zoo was largely deserted save for animals kept in cages. A woman and her young daughter wandered in to look at the bears. Many showed signs of captivity-induced stress, including uncontrolled headbanging. Staff members were nowhere to be found.
Approximately 700 tigers live on farms in Laos. Thousands more are believed to be kept throughout Southeast Asia, and an additional 5,000 to 6,000 are housed in over 200 breeding centres in China. Fewer than 4,000 of the big cats remain in the wild; farmed tigers now far outnumber total wild populations.
At an international conference on the endangered species trade last fall, Lao government officials acknowledged a growing problem with wildlife farms and committed themselves to closing down the country’s tiger farms. So far, little has changed.
One source who works closely with the government, who asked not to be named for fear of reprisals, said that some politicians remained deeply involved in the farms and that the country’s forestry department lacked the authority to shut them down.
Repressentative Ed Royce, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has singled out Laos as an international hub for illegal wildlife trafficking, saying in 2015 it was “quite clear officials are profiting”.
Lao government officials did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
Treaty limits breeding
According to the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species, or Cites, a treaty to which China and all Southeast Asian nations are signers, tigers are to be bred only for conservation – not for their parts, and not on a commercial scale that does not benefit wild tigers.
In Laos and several other Asian countries, however, conservationists have compiled ample evidence that many zoos and farms serve as fronts for commercial breeding.
“Farming tigers for trade confuses consumers and stimulates demand,” said Grace Ge Gabriel, Asia regional director of the International Fund for Animal Welfare.
In 2016, Tiger Temple in Thailand made headlines when monks there were accused of abusing tigers and selling them into the illegal wildlife trade. Eventually, 40 dead cubs were discovered in a freezer, along with pelts and other wildlife products.
Thailand has some 1,450 tigers in captivity, the majority of which are kept at popular attractions like Tiger Temple, where tourists pay to take photographs and play with cubs and young adults.
When the tigers reach sexual maturity and can no longer be handled safely, they often disappear, sold on the black market for up to $50,000, according to Karl Ammann, a Kenyabased investigative filmmaker who is making a documentary about the tiger farming industry.
Conservationists also have accused tiger farms in China – two of which are supported by government investment – of illegal activity.
Chinese law permits some tiger skins to be traded legally, although tiger bone has been banned since 1993. But in 2013 Banks of the Environmental Investigation Agency and her colleagues found that farms were stockpiling tiger bones to make wine and that skins from wild tigers were sold as being from captive-bred tigers.
After inquiries from the Times Meng Xianlin, executive director-general of the Chinese Cites management authority, declined to be interviewed. Several other Chinese officials did not respond to repeated interview requests.
Past violators often re-enter the wildlife farming business. Construction has already begun on a zoo next door to Tiger Temple. Officials in Vietnam recently granted permission for the wife of Pham Van Tuan, a twiceconvicted tiger trafficker, to import 24 tigers from the Czech Republic “for conservation purposes”.
Vuong Tien Manh, deputy director of Vietnam’s Cites management authority, said in an email that Vietnam had seized a number of frozen tigers and tiger bones over the past five years, most of which were suspected to have originated from Laos.
He added that Vietnam’s policies did not permit commercial breeding of tigers, but the country has some 130 tigers in captivity. All tiger farms are strictly monitored, Manh said, no matter who the owners are.
Bear bile collected
Though tigers are the most contentious of Asia’s farmed wildlife, they are by no means the only species caught up in the industry.
An estimated 10,000 bears are legally kept on Chinese farms for their bile, an ingredient in traditional medicine that is collected through a tube permanently implanted in the animals’ gall bladders, or through a hole in their abdomens.
Countless other species – crocodiles, porcupines, pythons, deer and more – are also farmed throughout China and Southeast Asia.
Some proponents, including government officials, believe that such facilities should be legal and encouraged, arguing that they relieve pressure to hunt wild animals by satiating demand with captive-bred animals.
Others say there is no evidence to back this assertion. “I can’t think of any species in Southeast Asia that benefits from commercial captive breeding,” said Chris Shepherd, the Southeast Asia regional director for Traffic, a nonprofit wildlife trademonitoring group.
Scott Roberton, the director of counter-wildlife trafficking at the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Asia programme, added that the risks associated with legalising trade in farmed tigers and other endangered species are the same as those associated for decades with the ivory trade.
“Legal trade stimulates demand, confuses law enforcement efforts, and opens a huge opportunity for laundering illegal products, which is why ivory markets are now being closed globally,” he said.
“There just isn’t the capacity within these countries to manage a legal trade in a watertight way,” Roberton said.
“Laundering” of animals as farmed that were actually caught in the wild is a frequent practice. In Chengdu, China, one-third of 285 bears rescued from bile farms and now living at a rehabilitation centre run by Animals Asia, a nonprofit group, are missing limbs, a sign that they were caught in the wild by snares.
The pet trade is also a problem. Indonesia annually exports over 4 million reptiles and small mammals labelled captive-bred – including thousands shipped weekly to the United States. But virtually all are caught in the wild, according to Shepherd.
“I’ve been to almost every reptile farm in Indonesia, and none have breeding facilities,” he said. “Wildlife dealers are running circles around everyone. It’s a joke.”
Though modern wildlife farming emerged in the 1990s and has only grown in popularity, wild populations of farmed species have continued to plummet, Shepherd said.
Tigers are effectively extinct in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, while just seven to 50 remain in the wild in China.
“No matter how many tigers are farmed, we still have wild tigers getting killed,” he said.
Heeding these arguments, Lao government representatives attending a major Cites meeting last September announced their intention to end tiger farming in their country.
International nongovernmental organisations are advising Lao authorities on how to carry through with that announcement, but there has been no progress to date.
Even if the authorities move forward with shutting down the farms, what to do with the country’s 700-plus captive tigers is a challenge. Euthanising them would bring unwanted media attention, but releasing them into the wild is not an option. There’s not much prey, and the tigers lack survival skills and have no fear of humans.
Yet keeping them is a burden; it costs thousands of dollars a year to feed a single tiger, Banks said, and tigers can live up to 20 years.
In 2002, Vietnam faced a similar dilemma when it made bear farming and bile sales illegal. Fifteen years later, around 1,200 bears still live with their original owners.
Many are kept in horrific conditions – in cages scarcely larger than their bodies, suffering from rampant disease and lacking adequate food and water – and their bile continues to be collected illegally.
Animals Asia runs a rehabilitation centre near Hanoi that houses 160 bears rescued from the trade, but the centre has permission to keep only 200 animals. Even if that cap were eliminated, however, the group lacks the funds and space to care for all of Vietnam’s remaining captive bears.
“Obviously, we can’t do this all ourselves,” said Tuan Bendixsen, Animals Asia’s Vietnam director.
“The government must take responsibility for their wildlife.”
Conservationists believe that international pressure may be crucial to persuading Asian governments to close tiger, bear and other wildlife farms, but that strategy’s effectiveness is compromised by an awkward fact: An estimated 5,000 tigers are held in backyards, petting zoos and even truck stops across the United States.