The Phnom Penh Post

Tobacco companies in quiet return to Formula One

-

TOBACCO giants Philip Morr i s a nd Br it i sh A mer ic a n Tobacco have formed partnersh ips w it h t hei r scient i f ic research subsidiari­es and Formula 1 tea ms Fer ra r i a nd McLaren more than a decade after cigarette advertisin­g was banned from the sport.

US giant Philip Morris Internatio­nal (PMI), whose Marlboro brand was long associated with Ferrari, re-entered the sport last October, branding Ferrari cars with “Mission Winnow” and a logo that hints at the white-onred triangles of the old Marlboro packs.

“Mission Winnow is aimed at illustrati­ng our commitment to constant developmen­t. This initiative shines light on the new Philip Morris and our partners and our commitment and common desire to develop for the best,” the group’s communicat­ions director Tommaso di Giovanni explained.

Since the Japan Grand Prix in October the Ferrari cars, drivers’ helmets and outfits have featured the Mission Winnow logo of three white arrows.

Since 2006, Formula 1’s ruling body FIA has been firmly opposed to any advertisin­g or sponsoring of cigarettes or tobacco.

But with teams struggling to meet their budget requiremen­ts, the allure of advertisin­g revenue from so-called “Big Tobacco” is clear to see.

McLaren cars are to feature advertisin­g for “A Better Tomorrow”, a British American Tobacco (BAT ) scientific research subsidiary linked to less controvers­ial electronic cigarettes.

BAT also said it would carefully study the varying rules in different countries which govern tobacco branding.

“We still need to determine which brand activation­s to implement in which countries, but we will of course respect regulatory environmen­ts,” their spokesman said.

Marlboro men

Opposition to the partnershi­ps between motor racing and tobacco groups, or any flaunting of anti-tobacco advertisin­g, is mounting.

The Australian Grand Prix Corporatio­n said it was concerned Philip Morris branding on Ferrari cars and driver uniforms at the Japan Grand Prix had breached Australian regulation­s when it was broadcast in the country.

“The Australian Grand Prix Corporatio­n has been in regular communicat­ion on this very important matter with all key stakeholde­rs.

“The AGPC works to ensure that the hallmark Victorian events we stage meet the requiremen­ts of government,” the AGPC told AFP this week.

Di Giovanni insisted PMI had not broken any laws.

“The logo on the outfits and cars and on our internet site comply with laws in Australia and in the state of Victoria,” he said.

A spokesman for the AGPC told AFP the ball was in the court of the Victoria Dept of Health and Human Services and that the department and the Grand Prix organisers were in touch with Ferrari on the issue of whether the Mission/ Winnow logo contravene­s the Australian ban on tobacco advertisin­g.

Meanwhile the Australian Communicat­ions and Media Authority (ACMA) confirmed they are looking into broadcasts by Australian networks of the Japan Grand Prix.

The ACMA is investigat­ing broadcasts of the Japanese Formula One Grand Prix broadcast on Network Ten and Fox Sports. The investigat­ion is ongoing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Cambodia