Bloomberg Businessweek (North America)

Flight Risk

A BUNGLED MERGER. A CORRUPTION SCANDAL. THREE CEOS IN A YEAR. BUT HEY, AT LEAST THE SNACKS ARE FREE AGAIN

- BY DRAKE BENNETT ILLUSTRATI­ON BY THE RED DRESS

After a troubled merger, United finally turns a profit—but fails to grow

arly last summer, a team at United Airlines set out to discover what bothered its passengers most. The airline collects 8,000 customer surveys a day, and there was a lot to choose from: Was it extra fees for luggage? The lack of legroom? The sour, thin coffee? Was it being forced to spend 20 hours in a frigid military barracks in Newfoundla­nd (as passengers on a United flight to London did last June)? How about the carrier’s tendency to lose the one bag you really need? (On June 17, 2014, Rory Mcilroy tweeted: “Hey @united landed in Dublin yesterday morning from Newark and still no golf clubs... Sort of need them this week.”) Could it be the problems with the reservatio­n system that caused widespread delays in 2012, and again in 2014, or the computer glitch on July 8, 2015, that led the airline to suspend all its flights, all over the world, for two hours? In October, United failed to provide a wheelchair to a passenger with cerebral palsy; he had to crawl off the plane.

Every airline has its horror stories, of course— air travel is full of opportunit­ies for customer disenchant­ment. But United has proved an industry leader: On all major performanc­e metrics—delays, cancellati­ons, mishandled bags, and bumped passengers—united has, since 2012, been reliably the worst or near worst among its competitor­s. In 2012, according to the U.S. Department of Transporta­tion, United was responsibl­e for 43 percent of all consumer complaints filed against U.S. airlines. It finished last among North American nondiscoun­t airlines in the 2015 J.D. Power & Associates customer satisfacti­on survey. Recently the carrier agreed to pay $2.8 million in fines for tarmac delays and the poor treatment of disabled passengers. “United is off-the-charts worse than anything I’ve ever seen,” says Lenny Mendonca, a retired senior partner at Mckinsey. Despite having flown more than 3 million miles with the airline, he says, “If I have any other alternativ­e, I will fly someone else.”

It’s been five years since United Airlines and Continenta­l Airlines combined to form what was at the time the world’s largest carrier, and the merger hasn’t gone well. In 2012 and early 2014, when American Airlines Group, Delta Air Lines, and Southwest Airlines reported large, and in some cases, record profits, “the new United” lost money. Earnings calls became an opportunit­y for then-chief Executive Officer Jeffery Smisek to apologize. “I know we created some customer disservice because of all the changes we made so quickly, and I apologize for that,” Smisek said in July 2012. “We know we can do better and are taking actions to do just that,” he promised in April 2014.

For the CEO, however, things got worse. Last September, Smisek resigned along with two other top executives as the Department of Justice investigat­ed whether the airline had tried to improperly influence the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, which operates the region’s major airports. One month later, Smisek’s successor, Oscar Munoz, suffered a heart attack and went on medical leave. On Jan. 6 he had a heart transplant. Although United promises he’ll return “at the end of the first quarter or the beginning of the second quarter of 2016,” no one can deny that a company that had long endured calls for a shake-up has been well and thoroughly shaken in a way that has both complicate­d and catalyzed its efforts to reintroduc­e itself to the world.

“We’ve been out front acknowledg­ing that, ‘Hey, it would have been great to get it together before year five,’ ” says Brett Hart, United’s general counsel and interim CEO. But the airline, he insists, is getting it together now: United’s numbers for on-time arrivals, cancellati­ons, and baggage handling in recent months have been the best since the merger. “People see the planes coming in and going out on time,” he says. “Employees’ interactio­ns with customers are different. Our customers’ response to the service is improving. People are saying, ‘You know, this feels like a new day.’ ” The second quarter of 2015 was the airline’s most profitable ever, with $1.3 billion in net income, excluding special items. In the third quarter, it climbed to $1.7 billion.

There have been false dawns before in the long saga of the United and Continenta­l merger—it’s the Zeno’s paradox of mergers, never quite reaching the destinatio­n. Despite its record profits, the airline has still struggled to grow—year-over-year, revenue was down 4 percent in the second quarter of 2015 and 2.4 percent in the third. The improvemen­ts the airline has made have, in many ways, simply brought it back to where it began. After its “customer experience” team went through the complaints from last summer, it settled on a straightfo­rward problem: the complicate­d boarding process United put in place in 2013, which it says it has fixed and will update soon. “It’s primed for improvemen­t,” says Vicki Bryan, a transporta­tion analyst at Gimme Credit who’s been particular­ly critical of United. “But I still see this company very much in limbo.”

FLY THE HOSTILE SKIES June 30, 2012

Where’s My Daughter? No one from United shows up to meet 10-year-old Phoebe Klebahn when she arrives at O’hare traveling as an unaccompan­ied minor. She misses her connecting flight, and her parents locate her only after a series of desperate calls to

the company.

Connie Garcia works in customer service for United at Newark Liberty Internatio­nal Airport. Her sister also works there, as does her husband, in facilities management. “It’s sort of a family business for me,” she says. She remembers hearing customers cheering in the terminals on Sept. 8. Curious, she asked around and learned that Smisek was stepping down. Gloria Reid, a flight attendant supervisor, was downstairs in the Newark crew lounge, where she says an impromptu party broke out. “Everybody was very happy,” she says, “extremely happy.”

The events that led to Smisek’s resignatio­n took place a year after he became CEO of the merged airline. In September 2011, he and two of his senior government affairs executives had dinner with David Samson, the Port Authority chairman, at a Manhattan trattoria called Novita. Smisek was pushing Samson to make hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of improvemen­ts at United’s Port Authority-operated

Newark hub. As reported last spring by Bloomberg, Samson asked for a favor in return: He wanted the new United to restore a discontinu­ed Continenta­l flight from Newark to Columbia, S.C., a short drive from a vacation house Samson and his wife owned.

Over the following months, Samson reiterated his request several times and said he was blocking the airport improvemen­ts. United added back the unprofitab­le flight. The “chairman’s flight,” as Samson liked to call it, was scheduled perfectly for his weekend trips and

Sept. 3, 2012 might have remained another obscure

Where’s My Dog? bit of New Jersey horse- trading if not

Beatrice, fashion model for the Bridgegate scandal, which

Maggie Rizer’s golden followed the intentiona­l snarling

retriever, leaves Newark of traffic in Fort Lee, N. J., by Port aboard a United flight. Authority officials and aides to New She dies before reaching

San Francisco. Jersey Governor Chris Christie to punish a local politician. Four days after Samson resigned, in March 2014, for his role in the traffic problems, the chairman’s flight was discontinu­ed.

The U.S. attorney for New Jersey hasn’t brought charges against anyone at the carrier, but the company’s announceme­nt made it clear that Smisek and the two other United executives at the dinner, Nene Foxhall and Mark Anderson, were stepping down because of United’s own internal investigat­ion. Smisek left with a severance package worth $28.6 million. Smisek, Foxhall, and Anderson didn’t respond to repeated requests for comment.

Smisek, an attorney, had been part of the team that turned around the struggling Continenta­l in the 1990s. Three months after being named that airline’s CEO, in January of 2010, he interrupte­d merger talks between United and US Airways to propose Continenta­l as a better partner. “I didn’t want him to marry the ugly girl,” Smisek said of Glenn Tilton, then United’s CEO, a comment for which Smisek apologized to US Airways CEO Doug Parker, who now runs American.

People who worked closely with Smisek describe him as funny and extremely smart but also reserved and, on occasion, tone-deaf. One former Continenta­l colleague remembers Smisek getting up

from the table after a meeting with pilots union representa­tives and immediatel­y pulling on the leather gloves

he used to drive his Porsche. Bryan,

the Gimme Credit analyst, argues that

Smisek’s aloofness paralyzed his man

agement team and made them slow to see problems developing. “You have an

July 9, 2012 Heavy Lifting United reports that a computer breakdown caused a flight to take off 20,000 pounds heavier than pilots believed because erroneous data indicated that the coach section of the plane

was empty.

elitist culture problem,” she says. “And who is content to work for this kind of culture? Not the kind of person who’s going to step up and say, ‘We need to do it like this.’ No, they’re going to do what Jeff says.”

Many of the merged airline’s front-line employees complained that management, having promised significan­t savings to Wall Street, focused on cutting costs above all else. There were layoffs, furloughs, and baggage handling and gate agent jobs were outsourced. Former Continenta­l employees say they’d been discourage­d from giving out vouchers to placate unhappy customers who had been bumped from their flights, though United says they hadn’t been. Even the new airline’s uniforms seemed the result of cost-cutting. “There were a lot of complaints about the quality of the uniform,” Garcia recalls.

The depth of employee discontent helps explain the merged airline’s poor performanc­e. “Unhappy mechanics do not tend to go the extra mile—or the extra foot—to get the airplane ready to go,” says George Ferguson, a Bloomberg Intelligen­ce airline analyst. Longtime fliers noticed the delays, cancellati­ons, and lost bags—and the short-tempered gate agents and flight attendants. “As individual­s, they are really nice people,” says Jared Spool, a Web design consultant who flies 150,000 miles a year on the airline. “But they are in such a horrible situation, constantly trying to deal with customers that are not happy, and they’re completely powerless.”

Some of the problems that have bedeviled the merged airline were inherited. During a brutal three-year bankruptcy that ended in 2006, United slashed salaries, defaulted on its corporate-pension plan, and stopped upgrading facilities and replacing planes, leaving a deeply embittered workforce and one of the oldest fleets in the business. Everything from baggage handling to aircraft reliabilit­y suffered. And even today, some labor issues remain beyond the company’s control. The former Continenta­l and United flight attendants, the only work group currently without a preliminar­y joint contract, are sharply divided over whose work rules to adopt. Until they decide, there’s little United can do.

One thing Smisek and his executive team clearly neglected was ensuring that flights left and landed on time, and building in allowances for the storms and mechanical failures that inevitably occur. Delta, by contrast, set out after its 2008 merger with Northwest Airlines to eliminate flight cancellati­ons unrelated to storms and largely succeeded. The extensive tech problems of the United- Continenta­l merger were also avoidable. Rather than combining the carriers’ reservatio­ns systems, websites, and frequent-flier programs over time, the company merged all three on the same day, maximizing disruption and confusion. And in adopting the passenger service system from Continenta­l, the smaller of the two airlines, United had to train a much larger number of people to use different software. In the end, that training proved inadequate. Continenta­l’s scheduling program, when adopted by the merged airline, lost track of pilots, leading to flight cancellati­ons, and assigned flights to pilots who were retired or dead.

An incident on July 14, 2014, crystalliz­ed the lack of trust between United employees and management. A flight was about to depart San Francisco for Hong Kong when menacing graffiti—the words “bye bye” and two crude faces—were found

July 14, 2014 No-fly Zone A flight from San Francisco to Hong Kong is canceled after security teams are unwilling to reinspect a plane tagged with menacing graffiti on the fuselage. Flight attendants refuse to fly and are later fired.

scrawled in oil on the fuselage. The flight attendants on board refused to fly unless the plane was given a full additional security sweep—malaysia Airlines’ Flight 370 had gone missing four months earlier. United’s flight operations, safety, and maintenanc­e teams, along with the plane’s pilots, responded that it had already been thoroughly checked. The standoff ended with the cancellati­on of the flight, and the flight attendants were fired for insubordin­ation.

At 3:30 p.m. Central time on Sept. 8, United alerted analysts of a conference call that would begin an hour later. When the analysts dialed in, they heard Henry Meyer III, the company’s brand-new nonexecuti­ve board chairman, announce Smisek’s immediate resignatio­n. His replacemen­t, Munoz, was a board member at United and, before that, Continenta­l, but was otherwise an outsider to the airline industry. He came from CSX, where he was the chief operating officer and president. He’d been seen as a likely pick to run the rail giant—early in his career he’d Passengers on United

worked both sides of the cola wars, first at Express flights into

Denver over the Pepsico and then at Coca-cola. When an 2014 holiday season analyst on the call asked Munoz whether, complain that the

in light of the sudden change at the top baggage handling

of United, any major decisions would system has all but come

be pushed into the future, he said that to a halt, with bags rou

putting things off “is not entirely in my tinely going missing and the wait at carouvocab­ulary, certainly.” When another sels often exceeding asked when the company would choose two hours.

a new chief financial officer (a post that remains unfilled), Munoz replied, “It’s my first half-hour.”

Munoz threw himself into the task of reintroduc­ing the airline to its customers. He called Gordon Bethune, the beloved Continenta­l CEO who had turned the airline around in the 1990s, and invited him to Chicago, where the two talked about how to repair the airline’s dismal reputation. United took out ads in newspapers across the country admitting that “we haven’t lived up to your expectatio­ns or to the promise and potential” of the 2010 merger. Munoz wrote an open letter to employees promising to “give you the right tools to deliver the service and reliabilit­y I know we are capable of.” He described a conversati­on with a longtime United flight attendant “near tears” who told him, “I’m just so tired of having to tell people I’m sorry.” During the hectic days before Thanksgivi­ng and Christmas, United managers handed out free bottles of water to customers at the airline’s hubs—an updated version of a Bethune tactic.

Munoz talked to employees wherever he flew, often surprising them in their breakrooms. “He listens exceptiona­lly well,” Bethune says, “and he understand­s the value of an engaged workforce.” On his second day on the job, Munoz walked the floor of the airline’s network operations center in Willis Tower, something people there recalled seeing Smisek do only a handful of times (usually with a camera crew in tow). In a story that quickly made the rounds, Munoz crashed an after-work employee party at a downtown Chicago bar. The approach seemed to be working. “I think the way to talk about it,” says Sara Nelson, a United flight attendant and the internatio­nal president of the Associatio­n of Flight Attendants-cwa, “is the airline was just incredibly sick and Oscar Munoz is like a shot of penicillin. It’s going to get better, but it has to have some time to actually settle in and work.”

In late September, Mendonca, the former Mckinsey partner, posted an open letter on the website Medium detailing his frustratio­n with United. Munoz e-mailed him, and the two set up a time to talk on Oct. 15. That day, Mendonca got an e-mail from Munoz’s assistant saying the CEO wasn’t feeling well. As United confirmed the next day, Munoz had been hospitaliz­ed with a heart attack. The following Monday, the company announced Hart was the interim CEO.

Soft-spoken and courteousl­y circumspec­t, Hart sat for an interview just before Thanksgivi­ng in his Willis Tower office, down the hall from the one kept vacant for Munoz. Asked what it was like to be the interim head of a massive company, he smiled: “There’s no real book on it. I looked around.” But, he added, “Oscar was with us long enough for us to have a very good understand­ing of how he wanted us to think about executing the plan and the various factors that we should take into considerat­ion: how something is going to impact the overall customer experience, how it’s going to impact our employees’ ability to provide great customer service, whether it’s innovative.”

Under Hart, the airline has kept up a steady stream of changes, some big, many small. On Oct. 23 it announced an agreement with the leadership of its mechanics union, then a month later a contract extension with its pilots. Both are contingent on votes by the unions’ members. The company declared a moratorium on outsourcin­g airport customer service and ramp jobs until 2017. Representa­tives from the company’s uniform vendors were brought in to hear employees’ complaints. Perhaps more significan­tly, the carrier brought back free snacks in economy class.

Then there was the coffee, an issue that, while hardly central to its business, symbolized United’s inability to get things right. On Nov. 19 the airline announced it was changing the coffee it serves on its planes and in its lounges from a brand called Fresh Brew to the Italian premium roaster Illy. It was welcome news to customers and to the flight crews used to fielding complaints. It was also a tacit admission that the choice of coffee after the merger, a decision that consumed thousands of man-hours, took nearly a year, and involved everyone from Smisek to the airline’s head chef to the flight attendants, hadn’t worked out.

More fundamenta­lly, United is reexaminin­g the way it boards planes. “There’s a lot of anxiety around the boarding process,” says Mandeep Grewal, the managing director who led last summer’s customer-satisfacti­on task force. “You repeatedly see lower satisfacti­on scores.” United’s boarding process—five cordonedof­f lines correspond­ing to their own boarding groups—was instituted in 2013 to bring organizati­on to the expectant throng at the gate. But what Grewal’s team found was that the lines were selfperpet­uating. As soon as someone got in the queue, others felt compelled to do the same. Well before boarding time, the lines would trail out across the concourse. Regardless of how long the process took, it felt longer to those going through it.

Working with planners in United’s airport operations department, Grewal ran experiment­s with flights out of Phoenix and Newark and came up with a system with only two main lanes: one for the group currently boarding and one for the group that was next. To preserve the prerogativ­e of latearrivi­ng priority passengers, a “bypass” lane was added. In late October the boarding process working group took over a gate at Chicago’s O’hare Internatio­nal Airport for four weeks. They boarded single-aisle and twin-aisle planes, flights full of business travelers, and flights to leisure destinatio­ns such as Hawaii. According to Michelle Brown, Grewal’s counterpar­t at airport operations, “We’re clearing the gate area faster now and getting a better flow.” United is refining its boarding algorithm and plans to roll it out later this year.

Oct. 20, 2015 Little Help? D’arcee Neal, who has cerebral palsy, crawls off his plane when, after waiting for 30 minutes, there’s still no wheelchair there to carry him to the jetway. A flight attendant reports the incident, and the airline calls him to apologize

the next day.

The routes planes fly are also evolving. Previously, the airline relied heavily on what’s known as linear routing: a plane starting in New York would land, say, in Chicago, then travel to Denver and San Francisco and end its day in Seattle. The method maximizes the hours each aircraft is in the air full of revenuegen­erating customers, but bad weather at one airport can cause delays and cancellati­ons along numerous routes. In November, United started increasing its use of “out-and-back” routing. It also increased the amount of time budgeted for turning planes around, something it hadn’t done even though, with newer, thinner seats, its planes were carrying more passengers.

“We’re trying to find more of a balance between scheduling an airline for maximum efficiency from an asset perspectiv­e as opposed to operations,” says Andy Buchanan, managing director of internatio­nal network planning. “We’re finding, I think, a better middle ground.”

Recent months have seen marked improvemen­ts in United’s performanc­e. Its on-time and missed-connection­s metrics have been the best since the merger. Its rates for mishandled baggage are also sharply down, according to the latest Department of Transporta­tion statistics. While the airline hasn’t closed the gap with industry leader Delta on those measuremen­ts, it’s at least pulled itself solidly into the middle of the pack. New planes have steadily been replacing older ones. And fliers are happier: Internal customer satisfacti­on scores were better in 2015 than in 2014, better in the fourth quarter of 2015 than in the third, and in December were the highest in two years.

On Jan. 7, United released an upbeat announceme­nt, quoting the chief of cardiac surgery at Munoz’s hospital. “Given Mr. Munoz’s excellent physical condition and the rapid pace of his recovery prior to the transplant, we expect a quick recovery and a return to his duties as CEO,” he said. If Munoz has no complicati­ons from his heart transplant, he should be in the hospital for 10 days. He’ll be able to drive a car in six weeks. A full recovery can take six months or more, but patients can return to work in two or three months if all goes well. Of course, as recent years should have taught everyone at United Airlines, it’s best to plan for complicati­ons. Whether the company’s board has done so remains to be seen; it has not publicly addressed the delicate but potentiall­y necessary issue of a successor.

The airline’s recent progress has occurred at a time of exceedingl­y friendly market conditions. Passengers have proved willing for the past few years to pay higher fares, and to submit, if grudgingly, to paying on top of that for checked bags, legroom, and food. Most of United’s profit of late is due to historical­ly cheap fuel—a huge cost for airlines—an advantage that may not last. After five cost-conscious years, it will be hard for United to find any more savings to squeeze out. And its rivals continue to make gains. Delta recently passed United to become the second-largest U.S. airline by traffic. United’s competitor American, now the world’s largest airline, has brought in record profits as it works through the challenges of its own 2013 merger with US Airways.

The true test will be finding a way to grow in less forgiving times. On Jan. 11, United reported that passenger revenue has declined more than expected, partly due to the Paris terrorist attacks. “Look, this is the airline industry. We are accustomed to windows opening and closing and opening again,” says Hart. “So we are not hitting the pause button in any respect.” <BW> � With reporting by Julie Johnsson and David Kocieniews­ki

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada