Bloomberg Businessweek (North America)

The FDA Reconsider­s Hearing Aid Rules 15%-30%

Regulation ▶ The White House wants looser rules on over-the-counter sales ▶ Regulation­s are “unfair to us and to consumers who might benefit” DATA: EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

-

The Bean is a small electronic device that people can put in their ears to help them hear better. Like hearing aids, it automatica­lly amplifies soft sounds and lets loud ones be heard naturally. Unlike hearing aids, which are regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion and can be sold only by licensed hearing experts, the Bean is available over the counter. The cheapest model retails for $299, a little more than one-tenth the price of most prescripti­on hearing aids. But FDA guidelines prohibit Bean manufactur­er Etymotic Research from marketing it to people who are hard of hearing. “We’re limited in how we can sell the Bean, and that’s unfair to us and to consumers who might benefit from it,” says Etymotic President Mead Killion, a PH.D. in audiology who holds 90 patents.

In October a scientific panel convened by the White House suggested loosening regulation­s on hearing aids to encourage the proliferat­ion of lowercost options such as Killion’s. The logic seems straightfo­rward—drugstores sell low-power reading glasses over the counter, so why not “personal sound amplificat­ion products,” or PSAPS, like the Bean? The FDA apparently got the message: On April 21 it was scheduled to hold a public workshop on whether its manufactur­ing standards for hearing aids are overly restrictiv­e. The agency, which has ultimate authority to set regulation­s, is determined “to better understand how we can overcome the barriers to access and spur developmen­t of devices that compensate for impaired hearing,” William Maisel, acting director of the FDA’S Office of Device Evaluation, said in an e-mail.

Killion will be at the hearing, as will representa­tives of the White House panel. So will representa­tives of the Big Six hearing aid manufactur­ers— Siemens, Sonova, Starkey Hearing Technologi­es, William Demant, GN Resound, and Widex— which control upwards of 95 percent of the $5 billion global market and endorse the FDA’S current hard line on PSAPS.

The old-school manufactur­ers, unsurprisi­ngly, wish to marginaliz­e PSAPS as a solution for hearing loss. Under existing FDA rules, the devices can be sold only for recreation­al use, targeting people with normal hearing (think hunters listening for prey, or birders tracking rare breeds by their chirps). “If they worked, most people would be using them,” says Carole Rogin, president of the Hearing Industries Associatio­n, a trade group. She says the White House panel, which is made up of academics and business executives— including Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Alphabet, the holding company for Google—is approachin­g the problem of undertreat­ed hearing loss the wrong way. “There is no evidence that consumers can self-diagnose and self-treat,” Rogin says. “You run the risk of serious medical conditions going unaddresse­d.”

Only 15 percent to 30 percent of the roughly 30 million Americans with hearing loss seek help, according to the White House panel’s report, which also asserted that the high cost of medical hearing aids is the biggest reason the number is so low. Convention­al hearing aids sell for more than $2,300 apiece on average, and many people need one for each ear. Medicare and most private insurance plans don’t cover hearing aids. And overlappin­g federal and state regulation­s have helped stifle competitio­n in the industry. The FDA and states require that consumers obtain a medical evaluation and then purchase hearing aids from a licensed audiologis­t or other credential­ed dispenser. Practition­ers typically offer a limited selection of brands and charge a single, bundled fee for the evaluation, the hearing aid, and any follow-up adjustment­s.

The FDA has cracked down on PSAP manufactur­ers that compare their over-thecounter gear to hearing aids. Federal agents seized a shipment from China of Neutronice­ar devices in June 2014 because online ads for the product included customer testimonia­ls saying the device is equivalent to “a regular hearing aid.” Brian Brinker, director of operations for Personal Innovative Products, the company that markets Neutronice­ar gear, says: “We got rid of the language the FDA didn’t like, and they released our shipment.”

The White House panel pointed out that the technology in PSAPS is often “similar, if not identical, to that in hearing aids.” It urged the FDA to create a new category of “basic” hearing aids that would be registered with the agency but sold over the counter, without any requiremen­t to

Share of Americans with hearing loss who seek help Etymotic’s Bean in-ear amplifier is available over the counter, unlike hearing aids

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada