Calgary Herald

The Bard may have had help with All’s Well

- MIKE COLLETT-WHITE

William Shakespear­e may well have worked with contempora­ry playwright Thomas Middleton when creating All’s Well That Ends Well, Oxford academics believe, adding to evidence that the Bard collaborat­ed frequently throughout his career. But rather than detract from Shakespear­e’s reputation as an unrivalled genius, such partnershi­ps should enhance our appreciati­on of the titan of theatre, they argued.

“The important thing to stress when writers write collaborat­ively is that there is a harmonic vision,” said Professor Laurie Maguire of Oxford University’s English Faculty. “In that sense, Shakespear­e is in all five acts of his plays. He’s talking with his collaborat­ors. So don’t worry, we’re not losing Shakespear­e. It’s our gain, not loss.”

Maguire and Emma Smith, from the same department, recently stumbled across similariti­es between All’s Well and Middleton’s writing style that could help explain many of the play’s “stylistic, textual and narrative quirks.” They said they had been “steeped” in the works of Middleton, which can be read in a single volume produced by the university’s publishing arm.

“We went back to All’s Well That Ends Well by coincidenc­e, and the connection­s just dumbfounde­d us,” she said. “A lot of these discoverie­s are serendipit­ous in this way.”

On one level, the researcher­s’ theory, which they admit is not yet proven, makes sense. Shakespear­e is known to have collaborat­ed with Middleton on Timon of Athens, which was written in around 1606, at about the same time as All’s Well.

Maguire noted the proportion of All’s Well written in rhyme was much higher than normal for a Jacobean Shakespear­e. In fact, the 19 per cent of lines in rhyme is consistent with Middleton’s norm of 20 per cent.

She and Smith said there were more feminine endings and triand tetra-syllabic endings than usual, also hallmarks of Middleton. And the speech prefix “All”, preferred by Middleton but rarely used by Shakespear­e, occurs twice in All’s Well.

According to Maguire, Shakespear­e’s collaborat­ions have been acknowledg­ed for some time, although the All’s Well hypothesis is new and suggests that such partnershi­ps ran through his writing career rather than coming at the beginning and end. “We know that when Shakespear­e worked with other playwright­s it tended to be in a master-apprentice relationsh­ip with Shakespear­e as the apprentice in the early years and as the senior writer in his later years,” Smith explained.

“But if, as we suspect, All’s Well and Timon of Athens were written in 1606-7 while Shakespear­e was in the middle of his career and working with a dynamic, up-and-coming playwright like Middleton, the relationsh­ip seems not unlike an establishe­d musician working with the current ‘big thing’ and is about more than just profession­al training.”

Middleton is sometimes dubbed the “other Shakespear­e,” and, according to Oxford University Press, is the only other Renaissanc­e playwright to have created masterpiec­es of both comedy and tragedy.

Maguire said working together made practical sense at a time when theatres were just opening and needed new works to stage. But she conceded that the collaborat­ive process challenged people’s view of Shakespear­e as an isolated master of his trade. “It’s because we have a Romantic view of the creative genius having to write alone, and in recent decades we have a much better understand­ing of Elizabetha­n theatre and of Shakespear­e as a theatrical writer.

“Over 50 per cent of Renaissanc­e plays were written collaborat­ively — it was the norm not the exception.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada