Hold Sen. Duffy to account, urges Harper’s lawyer
Robert Staley defends PMO’s actions in affair
The lawyer who advised Stephen Harper during the RCMP’s investigation into Sen. Mike Duffy’s senate expense claims has launched an extraordinary defence of the former prime minister’s actions and ethics and suggests authorities now need to hold Duffy to account outside of criminal court.
Just days after Ontario Court Justice Charles Vaillancourt cleared Duffy of 31 criminal charges and instead excoriated the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) under Harper, Toronto lawyer Robert Staley has penned a 715-word opinion piece in Wednesday’s Ottawa Citizen.
Staley says Harper acted with utmost rectitude during the affair, and portrays him as a victim who paid a heavy political price for the events within the PMO that Vaillancourt denounced as “mind-boggling and shocking.”
“From the outset, we were instructed by our client (Harper) to assist the RCMP in its investigation,” Staley writes. “Although this decision was politically inexpedient, it was the right thing to do and was an unequivocal act of integrity and accountability by the prime minister.”
Staley could not be reached Tuesday and it is not known what role, if any, Harper had in authorizing or approving the article or contributing to Staley’s assertions.
“It was our client’s position that Mr. Duffy was constitutionally qualified to sit as a senator,” representing Prince Edward Island, Staley continues. “At the same time, our client held the position that Mr. Duffy’s living-expense claims were politically unacceptable and must be repaid, whether or not they were technically permissible under applicable Senate rules. “
Staley takes particular offence at suggestions Harper may have somehow influenced the government’s decision to charge Duffy with 31 counts of fraud, breach of trust and bribery.
“Contrary to the views expressed by some commentators, no one could believe that my client’s interests were served by criminal charges against Mr. Duffy that were certain to play out through the 2015 federal election.
“My client played no role in the decision to charge Mr. Duffy.”
In fact, Staley says he told Harper that he seriously doubted the charge against Duffy of accepting an alleged $90,000 bribe from Harper’s chief of staff, Nigel Wright, would ever prevail in court.
“Of course, in Canada, the prime minister cannot influence criminal charges, so my private views remained just that, and were shared only with my client.”
Harper’s assertion was, and is, that the behaviour exhibited by Duffy was unacceptable, Staley writes. “It was and is my client’s view that public office demands a higher standard than conduct that falls short of criminality.”
Staley concludes his defence of Harper by suggesting federal auditor general Michael Ferguson “is likely” to launch a non-criminal review of Duffy’s senate travel and housing claims. (Ferguson’s office did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday.)
Vaillancourt’s 308-page judgment did not question or find fault with any of Harper’s actions during the affair. But the judge levelled several blistering critiques at Wright and the PMO for its “calculated pressure, inducements and threats and directed, solely for political reasons, toward the political protection of the government of prime minister Harper and the prime minister.”
MY CLIENT PLAYED NO ROLE IN THE DECISION TO CHARGE MR. DUFFY.