HBO’s male-centric lineup under fire
Network’s gender bias extends behind the camera, writes Maria Teresa Hart
Since the beginning, HBO’s sexist Game of Thrones has come under fire for its depiction of women. It has often used rape and prostitution as a backdrop; even supposedly consensual sex scenes minimize and dehumanize female cast members.
It’s got so bad that many female fans have pledged not to tune back in. One fan, Justine Juel Gillmer, tweeted last year, “so that’s THREE main female characters raped on #GameOfThrones who weren’t actually raped in the books. I think I’m done with the show.” Or Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Missouri, who wrote, “OK, I’m done, Game of Thrones ... Gratuitous rape scene disgusting and unacceptable. It was a rocky ride that just ended.”
Critics also voiced their objections. As Joanna Robinson wrote in Vanity Fair: “The last thing we needed was to have a powerful young woman brought low in order for a male character to find redemption. No thank you.”
Game of Thrones reflects a broader problem with HBO’s lineup: Its male-centric programming treats women as plot devices to serve a male protagonist. In the first season of True Detective, Michelle Monaghan’s character was mostly a carrier pigeon for its two male leads. In the second season, there was only one female lead and three male ones.
Silicon Valley has few female characters except for the stray stripper or cute girlfriend. And in the channel’s most recent addition, Vinyl, men are full of macho swagger and women are sexual wallpaper. Of course, HBO isn’t totally devoid of female-led programming. Girls and Veep both showcase female leads. But these are the exception, not the rule.
The problem extends behind the camera, too. HBO’s shows continue to be created, produced and directed by men. At last tally, female creators and producers for the shows above were hovering around the 12 per cent mark.
To defend their choices, Game of Thrones show-runners point to author George R.R. Martin’s argument that these stories are historically based on the Middle Ages, and reflect the sexism and sexual violence of that time.
But just because a show is set in the past doesn’t mean it has to be divorced from a female perspective. Outlander, a Starz show set in 1743, features a time period where women have little agency and must seek marriage in order to be legally protected. The protagonist, Claire, faces many of the same issues as women on Game of Thrones. Yet it’s so clearly driven by its female lead — with her experiences and her sexual desire as the driving narrative force — the viewer sees the world through Claire’s eyes and identifies with her struggles. This focus on a women’s perspective has paid off. In its first eight episodes, Outlander averaged about 5 million viewers and an audience that’s 59 per cent women. It’s achieved critical success with positive reviews and Golden Globe nominations too.
HBO, meanwhile, is struggling. Though Game of Thrones is a cable hit, Vinyl’s premiere’s ratings were low enough to be newsworthy — just 764,000, one of the lowest on record for an HBO show.
Togetherness was cancelled after averaging just 405,000 viewers. And True Detective was a critical and commercial flop in its second season, dropping 22 per cent in its viewers.
Here’s the message HBO should be getting: Tune out half your audience, and they tune you out in return.