Calgary Herald

Former DJ, Swift sue over alleged grope

Music star gives her take on incident, announcer blames radio colleague

- TRAVIS M. ANDREWS

During the past year, which Taylor Swift has mostly taken off from music save for one surprising concert, the pop star has (unsurprisi­ngly), continued to make headlines.

First, there was her breakup with Calvin Harris. Then there was her fleeting, Instagram-ready relationsh­ip with Tom Hiddleston.

But one dark cloud hung over much of the year: her drawn-out legal battle with Denver country radio DJ David Mueller.

It began in June 2013, when after performing a concert at Denver’s Pepsi Center, Swift attended a meet-and-greet. During that event, which Mueller attended with his girlfriend Shannon Melcher, he allegedly groped Swift while the couple took a photograph with her.

Later in the evening, Swift’s security team approached him and accused him of groping the superstar, Billboard reported. Mueller was fired from KYGO, the station where he had worked.

In response, Mueller filed a lawsuit claiming he lost his job — and was banned from Swift’s future concerts for the rest of his life — based on false allegation­s.

He claimed it was a co-worker who had groped Swift. He claimed his “superior” at KYGO, Eddie Haskell, “described and demonstrat­ed how he had put his arms around her, hands on her bottom.”

“Mueller steadfastl­y maintains that no inappropri­ate contact of any kind occurred between him and Ms. Swift,” the filing, obtained by the Denver Post, stated.

In response to that lawsuit, Swift filed a countersui­t in October 2015 in which she demanded a jury trial. If she wins, she claimed that she would donate any proceeds to “charitable organizati­ons dedicated to protecting women from similar acts of sexual assault and personal disregard.”

“Ms. Swift knows exactly who committed the assault — it was Mueller — and she is not confused in the slightest about whether her long-term business acquaintan­ce, Mr. Haskell, was the culprit,” the countersui­t states, according to People.

“Resolution of this Countercla­im will demonstrat­e that Mueller alone was the perpetrato­r of the humiliatin­g and wrongful conduct targeted against Ms. Swift, and will serve as an example to other women who may resist publicly reliving similar outrageous and humiliatin­g acts.”

One thing Swift has sought is that the photograph taken at that meetand-greet, which allegedly shows Mueller groping Swift, be sealed from the public.

Her lawyers argued it shouldn’t be shared with the public because, “it is all but assured that the photograph will be shared for scandalous and prurient interests.”

On Oct. 21, a judge agreed to seal the photograph but denied her request to withhold other evidence.

In a transcript of a video deposition Swift gave in July, she said, “right as the moment came for us to pose for the photo, he took his hand and put it up my dress and grabbed onto my ass cheek.”

She also explained the emotional toll the alleged assault has taken on her. “I remember being frantic, distressed, feeling violated in a way I had never experience­d before,” Swift said in the deposition.

“A meet-and-greet is supposed to be a situation where you’re thanking people for coming, you’re supposed to be welcoming people … and for someone to violate that hospitalit­y in that way, I was completely stunned.”

 ??  ?? Taylor Swift
Taylor Swift

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada