Calgary Herald

Notley stands by NDP’s handling of power deals

Premier fires back at critics upset about controvers­ial contract saga

- JAMES WOOD With files from Chris Varcoe and Emma Graney jwood@postmedia.com

Premier Rachel Notley said Thursday that critics of her NDP government’s handling of power contracts are off-base in their attacks.

The government this summer launched legal action to declare void a provision in power purchase arrangemen­t (PPA) regulation­s that allowed companies to cancel money-losing contracts.

And in recent weeks the NDP has refused to rule out legislatio­n that would retroactiv­ely nullify the provisions.

That’s prompted a furious response from Calgary, where Mayor Naheed Nenshi has described the idea as “nuts” and chamber of commerce president Adam Legge suggested it would be a “banana republic” move that would scare away investment.

Speaking to reporters following a speech at the Alberta Associatio­n of Municipal Districts, Notley rejected the criticisms. “I would suggest Adam Legge is not fully informed on what’s been going on with respect to this file up to this point,” she said.

“With respect to Mayor Nenshi, he’s taking a position with respect to one particular company that has a relationsh­ip with the City of Calgary. And that’s fine, sometimes people are going to have to agree to disagree.”

Enmax, owned by the City of Calgary, is one of four companies that have returned PPAs for coalfired electricit­y to the Balancing Pool using a provision that allows companies to terminate the contracts if any change in law makes the deals “more unprofitab­le.”

The companies cite the government’s Jan. 1 increase in the carbon levy on large emitters as the cause.

The government maintains the “more unprofitab­le” clause was unlawfully enacted under the previous Progressiv­e Conservati­ve government at the behest of the defunct and discredite­d Enron Corp.

It says that returning the contracts will cost Albertans an additional $2 billion on their power bills by 2020 when the PPAs expire.

On Thursday, Notley again would not rule out retroactiv­e changes to the law, though she said the government would not make that step on any other legislatio­n.

“My view is that on behalf of all people of Alberta, we need to make a decision that is going to result in the best financial outcome for all Albertans,” she said.

The premier also insisted that she does not believe the government’s actions will hurt its cause as it tries to attract an estimated $18 billion to $25 billion in investment for renewable and natural gas facilities as it phases out coal-fired power by 2030.

But Legge stuck to his guns, dismissing Notley’s argument that he’s ill-informed on the issue.

“Even musing about potential retroactiv­e legislatio­n has already done damage to Alberta’s reputation as a place for investment,” he said.

“She’s trying to making it out to be a complex issue, the issue I’m talking about is very simple. When you make a commitment or an agreement, you keep it.”

Wildrose Leader Brian Jean said the government is treading a dangerous path. “The rule of law obviously has to be dominant on government­s when they’re making decisions on contracts,” he said.

 ?? FILES ?? Enmax is one of four companies that have returned power purchase arrangemen­ts for coal-fired electricit­y to the Balancing Pool.
FILES Enmax is one of four companies that have returned power purchase arrangemen­ts for coal-fired electricit­y to the Balancing Pool.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada