Calgary Herald

First Nations, women had John A.’s vote

- NAOMI LAKRITZ

Sir John A. Macdonald continues to vanish from the Canadian landscape.

The latest to jump on the politicall­y correct bandwagon is Victoria, which has removed a statue of Macdonald from in front of its city hall. It is kind of ironic, actually, considerin­g that Victoria is named for the Queen who ruled during the Macdonald era and to whom he swore fealty as a loyal Britisher.

Poor Sir John A. He is the unfortunat­e victim of a narrow 21st-century mentality that sees him as a one-dimensiona­l figure, someone who laid the foundation for the Indian residentia­l schools and made derogatory comments about the need to civilize the “savages.” Therefore, he must be erased from the landscape, as if he had no more importance than a stick figure drawn in chalk on a blackboard.

Pretty soon, there will be nothing left of him, and it will be generally believed that Canada simply materializ­ed on its own out of thin air. Of course, for all that the current generation knows of history, it probably already seems that way.

Yes, Macdonald said and did those things for which he is being censured and banished today. But he also said, “There is no paramount race in this country ... ” And he wanted First Nations people to have the right to vote. Yes, you heard correctly.

Writing in the National Post in 2015, Richard Gwyn, the author of a two-volume biography of Macdonald, said: “Macdonald wanted native people to gain the franchise, an act at that time of immense symbolic importance, without losing any of their rights under either the Indian Act or any of their treaties.”

His crime is that he acted like a product of his time, instead of our own.

It only took almost another 100 years before anyone as enlightene­d as he presided over this country.

Gwyn added: “By the manner of his extension of the vote to Indians — a model of integratio­n as opposed to the discredite­d alternativ­es of either assimilati­on or apartheid — Macdonald was even further ahead, almost by a century. His initiative affecting Indigenous people did not out-live him, though: in 1898 it was cancelled by the newly-elected Wilfrid Laurier. Thereafter, native people continued to be denied the vote, all the way to 1960 when John Diefenbake­r restored Macdonald’s initiative.”

Macdonald also wanted women to have the vote. “He wanted to amend the act so that the ‘Persons’ clause would read ‘Persons means men … or women who are widows or unmarried’. He anticipate­d the famous ‘Persons’ judicial decision of 1929 by almost half a century,” Gwyn wrote.

Macdonald explained his views this way: “I am strongly of that opinion, and have been for a good many years, and I had hoped that Canada would have the honour of first placing women in the position she is certain, eventually, after centuries of oppression, to obtain … of completely establishi­ng her equality as a human being and as a member of society with man.”

This is the forward-thinking man whom the politicall­y correct now desire to obliterate on the basis of a number of untoward remarks he made. His crime is that he acted like a product of his time, instead of our own. This is the visionary whose accomplish­ments British statesman Benjamin Disraeli praised as those of “a considerab­le man.”

Macdonald knew he had done things that were wrong. Like all of us, he was a complex human being with flaws and virtues.

“My sins of omission and commission I do not deny; but I trust that it may be said of me in the ultimate issue, ‘Much is forgiven because he loved much,’ for I have loved my country with a passionate love,” he said.

Forgivenes­s is not in the vocabulary of the politicall­y correct faction, who fail to realize that without Macdonald, there might not even be a country called Canada today.

O Canada, how do you have the heart to do this to Sir John A. Macdonald?

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada