Calgary Herald

POLARIZING PATRIOTISM

-

Far be it for us to tell another country how to celebrate its patriotism — especially since Canada is not the most extroverte­d of nations when it comes to national symbols.

Few of us hang the Maple Leaf on our front porches. We proudly stitch small flags on backpacks and wear lapel pins on overseas trips, albeit partly to avoid the “You’re American” assumption­s of foreign accent guessers.

But as a concerned friend and neighbour, we can’t help but comment on the polarizing atmosphere in the U.S. over its national symbols.

The controvers­y that won’t die started in 2016 when Colin Kaepernick, the now unemployed quarterbac­k, was noticed sitting down during the national anthem at an NFL preseason game.

When asked about it, he explained: “I’m not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of colour.”

The powder keg was lit. The sitting became kneeling and was adopted by players around the league. They were quickly accused of disrespect­ing their national anthem, their flag and members of the armed forces, past and present.

The polarizing debate expanded across the country, eventually attracting comments from the Polarizer in Chief, Donald Trump, who suggested the white team owners fire the primarily black protesters.

Nike revived the issue by enlisting Kaepernick in an advertisin­g campaign to “Just do it.” The company’s shares plunged but have since rebounded. The polarizing began anew, with people burning their running shoes and cutting the Nike symbol from their socks. Municipal purchasing department­s and evangelica­l churches joined in the sports-clothing boycott.

The flag debate took another incendiary turn recently over a supposed slight in the film First Man, featuring the story of astronaut Neil Armstrong (played by a Canadian actor.) The movie fails to show the planting of the American flag on the American moon.

Those critics fail to recall that Armstrong celebrated NASA’s achievemen­t on behalf of all earthlings. “That’s one small step for man; one giant leap for mankind.”

Sadly, all the controvers­y has short-circuited any fruitful discussion of the very real issues of racism and injustice. The various fatal police shootings are well documented; the riots over mistreatme­nt are frequent; the gap between rich and poor widens; racism remains a festering wound.

Yet to some, the issue is reduced to “You’re disrespect­ing the flag.” What is forgotten or ignored is that the flag is only a symbol; a symbol for a country that has a long history of civil rights marches and protests that have advanced many worthy causes. The U.S. Constituti­on and Declaratio­n of Independen­ce are beacons for modern democracie­s.

It also has a history of slavery, lynchings, police brutality and supporting tinpot dictators, but we digress.

The point is the symbol should not be more important than the underlying civil rights that are enshrined in a constituti­on that really is worth preserving and protecting. Freedom of speech and freedom to protest are much more valuable than a piece of cloth or a hard-to-sing anthem.

In the editorial-writing business, this is where we usually pose a possible solution. But we’ve got nothing. If a sensible discussion can’t replace the endless reaction and counter-reaction, then there’s no hope for fixing the bigger problems. We don’t see that happening in the current climate.

The movie fails to show the planting of the American flag on the American moon.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada