Calgary Herald

Transparen­cy for Olympic funds won’t apply unless Calgary wins, NDP says

- MEGHAN POTKINS mpotkins@postmedia.com Twitter: @mpotkins

The NDP government’s requiremen­t that Calgary 2026 be subject to transparen­cy rules will only apply if Calgary is awarded the Olympics, the province has clarified.

With the announceme­nt last week that the province is committing $700 million toward the cost of Calgary hosting the 2026 Winter Games, more details are emerging about the funding conditions.

A letter from the provincial government states that Calgary 2026, or any successor corporatio­n or organizing committee, will be subject to provincial transparen­cy and freedom of informatio­n laws, “or equivalent rules or regulation­s.”

“Three billion dollars in public funding must be spent in a transparen­t manner and we expect all of our partners would agree,” Marion Nader, press secretary for Culture and Tourism Minister Ricardo Miranda, said on Tuesday.

“Our government will consider all legislativ­e and regulatory options, and will work with the other funding partners and Calgary 2026 on future transparen­cy requiremen­ts.”

The province’s money is also contingent upon a majority of Calgarians voting in favour of hosting the Olympics in the Nov. 13 plebiscite.

But the requiremen­t for increased transparen­cy — which could involve making the bid corporatio­n subject to provincial or federal freedom of informatio­n laws — won’t apply unless Calgary bids and is awarded the Games next June. Nor will it be applied retroactiv­ely to the work of the bid corporatio­n to date.

Mayor Naheed Nenshi has raised doubts that Calgary 2026 will actually be made subject to the province’s freedom of informatio­n and protection of privacy laws, even if the bid proceeds.

“(Finance Minister Joe Ceci) probably misspoke in that if he really wanted FOIP to apply, he would have to make a legislativ­e change,” Nenshi said Monday. “But we have talked a lot about the importance of transparen­cy in this work while maintainin­g commercial­ly sensitive informatio­n that doesn’t actually drive up cost and there’s no problem with that.”

Nenshi said the bid corporatio­n has already committed to making as much informatio­n public as possible, making the province’s request “redundant.”

“It’s super redundant. It basically is grandstand­ing. It’s already being done.”

No Calgary Olympics campaigner Erin Waite says regardless of the conditions imposed by the province, the perception of the city or the bid corporatio­n withholdin­g informatio­n has eroded public trust in the project. She said the province’s financial contributi­on also clearly signals a lack of enthusiasm.

“The amount of funding plus those conditions says there’s not a lot of enthusiasm for this project,” Waite said.

“It is support because support was asked for, so they followed through and provided support and good for them. But I do think the underlying message is there isn’t a lot of appetite and that’s just being responsibl­e to today ’s economy and the government’s financial position.”

Three billion dollars in public funding must be spent in a transparen­t manner and we expect all of our partners would agree.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada