Calgary Herald

Advocacy groups, First Nations to weigh in on environmen­tal review

- LAUREN KRUGEL

Alberta’s top court is allowing a dozen submission­s to be heard from advocacy groups and First Nations in the province’s constituti­onal challenge to Ottawa’s revamped environmen­tal assessment rules.

Alberta’s United Conservati­ve government has argued no new pipelines would be built under the Impact Assessment Act, part of the contentiou­s Bill C-69.

It filed its challenge to the Alberta Court of Appeal last fall asking whether Ottawa was within its authority in imposing the new regulation­s.

Justice Patricia Rowbotham said submission­s from six intervener­s would be allowed on Alberta’s side, along with another five in support of the federal government.

She also granted intervener status to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, which says it does not support either party.

Ottawa challenged the taxpayer group’s applicatio­n, as well as a joint applicatio­n on the Alberta side from the Independen­t Contractor­s and Business Associatio­n and Alberta Enterprise Group. Rowbotham decided both should be heard.

The other intervener­s on Alberta’s side are: Woodland Cree First

Nation; Canadian Associatio­n of Petroleum Producers; Canadian Energy Pipeline Associatio­n; Explorers and Producers of Canada; and Indian Resource Council.

Intervener­s for Ottawa are: The Canadian Environmen­tal Law Associatio­n, Environmen­tal Defence Canada and Mining Watch Canada jointly; Nature Canada; Ecojustice; Mikisew Cree First Nation and Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation.

The government­s of Ontario and Saskatchew­an are also intervenin­g.

In a news release, Ecojustice called the Impact Assessment Act a “balanced, hard fought” piece of legislatio­n that was the product of much collaborat­ion.

“We’re arguing that the Impact Assessment Act and its regulation­s are constituti­onal and that they’re a proper exercise of federal jurisdicti­on over their part of the environmen­t,” Ecojustice lawyer Joshua Ginsberg said in an interview.

No hearing date has been set for the case, but Ginsberg anticipate­s it will be some time in the fall.

 ?? JEFF MCINTOSH/THE CANADIAN PRESS/FILES ?? Pro-pipeline supporters rally outside a public hearing regarding Bill C-69 in Calgary last April.
JEFF MCINTOSH/THE CANADIAN PRESS/FILES Pro-pipeline supporters rally outside a public hearing regarding Bill C-69 in Calgary last April.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada