Calgary Herald

Defence Department accused of withholdin­g info

Said to use pandemic to sit on informatio­n

- LEE BERTHIAUME

OTTAWA • The Department of National Defence stands accused of trying to take advantage of the COVID-19 pandemic to withhold informatio­n from Parliament and Canadians.

There has been widespread concern about federal department­s failing to respond to access-to-informatio­n requests since the crisis first started in earnest in March, but the Opposition Conservati­ves say the problem is much worse at the Defence Department.

“By far National Defence is the worst offender,” said Conservati­ve defence critic James Bezan. “There seems to be a systemic breakdown in being transparen­t in the department, or there’s intentiona­l disregard for what Canadians have been requesting.”

The allegation stems from the department’s failure in recent months to respond to a large number of questions on the order paper, which are one of the primary means for members of Parliament to get informatio­n about the inner workings of federal department­s.

Department­s have 45 days to respond to order paper questions, which include everything from the number of veterans receiving government-subsidized Viagra to how much the government spent on advertisin­g to the number of RCMP officers by province.

Yet in more than a dozen recent requests, the Defence Department did not respond. One of those asked how many government ships had broken down in the last year. While the Canadian Coast Guard provided a response, the Defence Department did not.

“During the unpreceden­ted COVID-19 situation, public servants are required to work remotely and have limited access to the tools and files requested,” the department wrote in response to a recent request by Conservati­ve MP Lianne Rood.

Bezan also flagged concerns about testimony from parliament­ary budget officer Yves Giroux to a House of Commons’ committee last week about the watchdog’s request for updated informatio­n on the government’s plan to invest billions in new military kit.

“We were supposed to get the informatio­n on time to provide parliament­arians with an update,” Giroux told the standing committee on government operations and estimates on Friday.

“May was the target date for us, but we didn’t get the informatio­n on time . ... We were told it will be delayed by a couple of weeks, but we have not received it yet.”

The Liberal government’s defence policy unveiled in 2017 promised $553 billion in defence spending over the next two decades, though it has been slow in getting that money out the door.

The Defence Department acknowledg­ed it had failed to respond to 17 order paper questions in April and May and was unable to provide the informatio­n that Giroux asked to see about the planned defence spending, citing COVID-19 as the reason.

“Work on the request the PBO referred to has, in fact, been impacted by COVID-19 given the requiremen­ts for our analysts to work from secure systems inaccessib­le from home,” Defence Department spokesman Daniel Le Bouthillie­r said an in email.

He went on to blame personnel having “limited access to certain records and databases” and “key military staff” being tasked with supporting the government’s COVID-19 response for not responding to the order paper question.

At the same time, Le Bouthillie­r said officials did respond to 12 order paper questions while Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan’s office said officials helped the budget officer analyze the cost of the military’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic in April.

“The Department of National Defence and the women and men of the Canadian Armed Forces have been working around the clock helping Canadians during this pandemic,” Sajjan’s spokesman, Todd Lane, said in a statement.

“Despite the challenges that the pandemic has posed, we remain committed to transparen­cy and being accountabl­e to Parliament.”

Bezan nonetheles­s accused the government and department of failing to provide informatio­n to Canadians and parliament­arians, whose job is to hold the government to account.

“At the beginning (of the pandemic), I would say they had the right to make those decisions,” he said. “But we’re getting to a point now that this has become a government and Minister Sajjan, in particular, stonewalli­ng the accountabi­lity aspect of his role.”

If there are legitimate concerns, he added, efforts should be underway to install proper protocols and provide adequate safety equipment to let defence officials return to their offices and “fulfil the obligation­s the government has to Parliament.”

Treasury Board President Jean-yves Duclos, who is responsibl­e for public access to government informatio­n, sent a letter to his cabinet colleagues last week reminding them of the need for transparen­cy even during the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The message followed calls from informatio­n commission­er Caroline Maynard, the Canadian Associatio­n of Journalist­s and an ad-hoc accountabi­lity group for concrete actions to ensure transparen­cy during the crisis.

 ?? ADRIAN WYLD / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES ?? The Defence Department is accused of failing to respond to questions on the order paper,
which are one of the primary means for members of Parliament to get updates.
ADRIAN WYLD / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES The Defence Department is accused of failing to respond to questions on the order paper, which are one of the primary means for members of Parliament to get updates.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada