Calgary Herald

Quebec is trying to unilateral­ly amend the Constituti­on, again

- TRISTIN HOPPER

The government of Quebec has just tabled a bill proposing that they start ignoring the 155-year-old Constituti­onal mandate requiring Canadian lawmakers to swear an oath to the sovereign.

This is the second time in two years that Quebec has tried to unilateral­ly edit the text of the Constituti­on of Canada, and it's still not entirely clear if they can.

The British North America Act, the 1867 British legislatio­n that created Canada, is pretty explicit that nobody in Canada gets to take their seat as a provincial legislator before first swearing allegiance to the monarch.

“Every Member of a ... Legislativ­e Assembly of any Province shall before taking his Seat therein take and subscribe ... the Oath of Allegiance,” reads Section 128 of the Act.

To this, Quebec's solution is simply to send Ottawa a note saying that they're not going to listen to that part of the Constituti­on anymore. “Section 128 does not apply to Quebec,” reads the proposed amendment, which Quebec is asking to immediatel­y be slipped into the Constituti­on.

Typically, it's not nearly this easy to amend the Constituti­on of Canada. Any change to the text is supposed to require the approval of the House of Commons, the Senate and at least two thirds of the provinces.

And for really foundation­al changes to the Constituti­on, it requires unanimous provincial support. Abolishing the “office of the Queen,” for instance, would need a sign-off from all 10 provincial legislatur­es — making Canada the hardest country in the commonweal­th in which to abolish the monarchy (the Brits, by contrast, would only need an Act of Parliament).

But starting last year, the government of Quebec Premier François Legault embraced the idea that it could start rewriting sections of the British North America Act on its own.

The Constituti­on allows legislatur­es to amend their own provincial constituti­ons without federal approval. As the Constituti­on states, “each province may exclusivel­y make laws amending the constituti­on of the province.”

But unlike, say, British Columbia, Quebec doesn't have its own written constituti­on. Just like Canada, the province's founding document is the British North America Act.

And so, in 2021 legal scholar Patrick Taillon publicly proposed that Quebec could simply start rewriting the Quebec-specific parts of the British North America Act and nobody would be able to stop them.

The Legault government seized on the idea, and within weeks they had sent a package of amendments to Ottawa rewriting the BNA Act to identify Quebec as a “nation” and to include a caveat that “the only official language of Québec is French.”

Although nobody had ever tried unilateral­ly rewriting the BNA Act before, the move quickly got the green light from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who said at the time it was “perfectly legitimate for a province to modify the section of the Constituti­on that applies specifical­ly to them.” The leaders of all other major parties at the time quickly signalled their assent.

Of course, just because the changes didn't receive any political pushback doesn't mean that they're constituti­onal. In a scathing critique of the 2021 changes, Mcgill University constituti­onal scholar Ian Peach said that permitting legislatur­es to change the “constituti­on of the province” only means they can alter their “small-c” constituti­on; the set of written and unwritten laws which govern provincial affairs. It doesn't mean they can just start slipping edits into the national “big-c” Constituti­on.

“Simply reading the text of the Constituti­on Act, 1982, as well as surveying the history of previous amendments to the Constituti­on since patriation, provides one with the clear answer that Quebec cannot do so,” wrote Peach.

The Oath of Allegiance has been a controvers­ial requiremen­t among Quebec legislator­s ever since the 1960s, although hardcore Quebec nationalis­ts have typically gotten around the provision by crossing their fingers during the oath, or by appending it with the clause, “until the people of Quebec are free.”

Right now, the entire three-member caucus of the Parti Québécois is refusing to take their seats in the Quebec National Assembly in order to dodge the requiremen­t to swear allegiance to King Charles III.

 ?? JACQUES BOISSINOT
/ THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES ?? Parti Québécois members are refusing to take their seats in the Quebec National Assembly (above) in order to dodge
a requiremen­t to swear allegiance to King Charles III.
JACQUES BOISSINOT / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES Parti Québécois members are refusing to take their seats in the Quebec National Assembly (above) in order to dodge a requiremen­t to swear allegiance to King Charles III.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada