Calgary Herald

Parks Canada derails Banff gondola proposal

Federal agency meddling in the town's municipal affairs, project developer says

- BILL KAUFMANN Bkaufmann@postmedia.com X (Twitter) @Billkaufma­nnjrn

A bid to build a gondola from the Banff townsite to Mount Norquay has been stopped in its tracks by Parks Canada.

After saying it's been turned down twice by the federal agency, which has final say in such developmen­ts, Banff Park Supt. Salman Rasheed delivered the same message in a tersely worded letter submitted to Banff town council's public hearing Wednesday.

“Again, our review noted that the proposed gondola from the ARP (area redevelopm­ent plan) site to the Mount Norquay ski area has been assessed twice and found not to be feasible due to non-conformanc­e with key park policy and legislatio­n,” Rasheed said in the letter.

While he said changes in the plan's third draft are appreciate­d, “it remains the view of Parks Canada that the draft ARP does not fully conform with applicable federal statutes and regulation­s.”

In 2020, Parks Canada rejected a plan for a gondola extending from the town to the top of the resort's mountain.

It has said its constructi­on would extend developmen­t outside the ski hill's boundary, which would violate environmen­t-related limits on such activity in Banff National Park.

“We believe all these policies and instrument­s are fundamenta­l to protecting the park's ecology and resources unimpaired for future generation­s. Parks Canada is not willing to change them to accommodat­e this proposal,” then-park superinten­dent Dave Mcdonough wrote in a December 2019 letter to Jan Waterous, whose company, Liricon Capital, was proposing the gondola.

Rasheed said Parks Canada came to a similar conclusion of non-conformanc­e in September 2022, and without meeting that criteria an environmen­tal review can't be conducted.

The gondola's terminus is part of a plan to redevelop railway station lands in the Banff townsite, which, along with Mount Norquay, is owned by Liricon. The company is also proposing a passenger rail link from Calgary to the mountain resort town.

The 17.5-hectare site would be transforme­d into a promenade with retail shops, restaurant­s and residentia­l, and an expansion of the existing parking space.

Liricon has said a new gondola would capture some of the market from its Sulphur Mountain competitor, thus reducing vehicular traffic in the town.

In a written response to Parks Canada's latest refusal, Waterous said she's frustrated with the federal body's obstructio­n of plans rooted in environmen­tal sustainabi­lity.

“Parks Canada is now raising a spurious concern about a potential gondola terminus in the ARP, which is fundamenta­l to making the multimodal transit hub economical­ly sustainabl­e,” she stated.

“Addressing vehicle congestion in Banff has been a primary concern for decades of both residents and visitors. We took on these projects to reduce this congestion as a result of Parks Canada's failure to address vehicular traffic. This failure has been detrimenta­l to both the ecological integrity and visitor experience in the park.”

She said among six errors it made in its conclusion, Parks Canada has confused an earlier proposed gondola that would extend to Norquay's summit with a later plan to build a smaller version that terminates at the ski resort's base, which has not been assessed.

Parks Canada, she said, has also not assessed the gondola proposal twice. “Norquay has not made a second gondola proposal submission to date.”

Much of the opposition to the overall plan focused on developmen­t of the Banff railway lands, but the gondola component “would still contribute to the cumulative effect to the area and the amount of increased human presence that would detract from predictabi­lity and movement for wildlife,” Katie Morrison, executive director of the southern Alberta Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, said in a written submission.

Waterous said Parks Canada is meddling in municipal affairs and the town shouldn't accept it.

“Town council's ability to represent the community should not be prematurel­y thwarted by Parks Canada administra­tion,” she stated.

“Town council must not blindly follow whatever Parks Canada administra­tion determines.

“In such a case, town council would have no power and the town would effectivel­y be run by the unelected Parks Canada administra­tion.”

Addressing vehicle congestion in Banff has been a primary concern for decades of both residents and visitors.

 ?? OLGA RADZIKH ?? “Town council must not blindly follow whatever Parks Canada administra­tion determines,” gondola developer Jan Waterous says.
OLGA RADZIKH “Town council must not blindly follow whatever Parks Canada administra­tion determines,” gondola developer Jan Waterous says.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada