The Kate photo scandal has tested the public's trust. How do the Royals get it back?
The rumours were already rampant on social media.
Then "photogate" came along last Sunday, setting off even more speculation as a digitally manipulated picture of the Princess of Wales and her three children was killed by photo agencies, adding yet another curious chapter to the saga surrounding Catherine as she recovers out of the public eye from planned abdominal surgery nearly two months ago.
Some of the media din has eased in the United King‐ dom in the past few days. Some headlines are sug‐ gesting "Lay off Kate" and al‐ low her to convalesce in peace.
But after what's become known in some quarters at the "Kate Middleton photo scandal," questions loom over what this latest episode might mean more broadly for the Royal Family as it tries to find ways to bolster its rele‐ vance.
Headlines on both sides of the Atlantic wonder if the royals "can move on" from the media storm or raise the spectre of a "trust problem."
Whether trust has been damaged will only emerge over time, but in ways it ap‐ pears to have been tested, at least in the short term.
"A little bit has died," Mark Borkowski, a U.K. public rela‐ tions expert, said in an inter‐ view.
"But the true answer to regain that respect and trust comes with what their big moment is when Kate comes back into her royal duties."
WATCH | Photo adds to speculation about Cather‐ ine's health:
When exactly that will be is unknown. When Kensing‐ ton Palace announced Catherine had undergone surgery in January, it was said she would likely be out of the public eye until after Easter.
"I think once Catherine is back in the public eye and on royal walkabouts and able to answer questions even infor‐ mally about how she's feel‐ ing, I think that will dampen a lot of the speculation," Car‐ olyn Harris, a Toronto-based royal author and historian, said in an interview.
Queen Victoria disap‐ peared for a while, too
Also spawning the recent ru‐ mours is the rarity of a senior member of the Royal Family particularly one who has such a high public profile being for all intents and pur‐ poses publicly invisible for such a long period.
"Whenever a member of the Royal Family is out of the public eye for an extended period of time, this leads to a great deal of speculation about what the reason might be for that seclusion," said Harris.
Harris points to the time of Queen Victoria, and the extended period of mourning she went into after the death of her husband, Prince Al‐ bert, in 1861. Speculation tried to link her disappear‐ ance to mental health issues in previous generations of her family.
"As she was the grand‐ daughter of King George III, there were members of the public and members of the political class who speculated about her mental health … that she was experiencing a mental breakdown because of George III's condition," Harris said.
WATCH | Apology likely the last we will hear on this:
Catherine's public profile pre-surgery - for the Royal Family also appears to be playing into how the specula‐ tion has swirled.
"She was everywhere … every front page, every news‐ paper carried her looking fabulous every day," said Borkowski.
For more than two mon‐ ths, however, that's been gone, leaving a void.
'William wants to pro‐ tect her'
"The King's ill. Camilla's tired," said Borkowski. "Willi‐ am wants to protect [Cather‐ ine]. He hates the media as well, which is the other point.
"He has no empathy with the media's demands, so he wants to wrap her up in cot‐ ton wool and, you know, family first. Of course, that doesn't really work."
The whole episode has prompted questions about just what public relations strategy has been at work in recent weeks for the royals, who have their various of‐ fices overseeing their public images.
Certainly there appear to be different approaches, as pictures continue to emerge of King Charles undertaking some royal duties - meeting ambassadors or British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak at Buckingham Palace - while he undergoes treatment for an undisclosed form of can‐ cer. A video message from Charles was played at the Commonwealth Day service in Westminster Abbey on Monday.
Borkowski sees the cur‐ rent situation as one that
might make the royal house‐ holds "think about how they strategically communicate," knowing that "they've got to adapt and continue to shape shift to deal with a world that is run by social media."
'More about media selfinterest'
Questions also arise, how‐ ever, over the media's role it‐ self in recent weeks.
"I think that the media is making a meal of this," Judith Rowbotham, a social and cul‐ tural scholar and visiting re‐ search professor at the Uni‐ versity of Plymouth in south‐ western England, said in an interview.
"And while I am normally an enthusiastic supporter of the media for exposing things that need to be ex‐ posed, this is more about media self-interest than the public self-interest."
Rowbotham says the criti‐ cal assessment of the photo released Sunday was used by the media to build a big story that sells media views.
"The media is insisting on there being a public demand to know more. 'Tell us every‐ thing, Kate. Come clean, Kate,'" said Rowbotham.
"It has been, frankly, I think, unkind and a conva‐ lescent Kate really could do without this."
On the issue of trust, Row‐ botham thinks it's "more that the Royal Family will be less trusting of the media" and that the number of images they release may be reduced.
"I think it's going to be more a question of, OK, you're going to get good snaps of them from profes‐ sional photographers on public occasions … from the occasional member of the public who's got a good shot and has done a good job, but that they will be less ready to share … something which gives a more personal and private insight."
Harris expects that in the short term, there's going to be a lot of scrutiny on any images that appear of mem‐ bers of the Royal Family along with more information from them about any film footage or photos that are released.
"And then gradually trust will be rebuilt."
Harris is also curious about just how Catherine will return to public life.
Will there, for example, be photographs released of be‐ hind-the-scenes meetings where she's sitting down, with less time on her feet?
"Or is she going to remain in comparative seclusion un‐ til she is able to conduct walkabouts and greet the public?" said Harris.
"It will be interesting to see how William and Cather‐ ine negotiate Catherine's re‐ turn to public life."