What's wrong with this picture? Plenty, say experts
What was intended as a simple family photo has become a royal headache for Princess Catherine and her family, after social media users and photo ex‐ perts pointed out numer‐ ous inconsistencies that suggest the photo was heavily manipulated.
A disappearing sleeve, a misaligned zipper and green summertime leaves are just a few details that have raised questions about what was done to the photo, and by ex‐ tension, about the state of Catherine's health.
"It is probably not wise to manipulate imagery to this degree when people are looking to the image and the image is being used as proof of Kate Middleton basically being fine," said Claire Lei‐ bowicz, head of AI and media integrity at the Partnership on A.I., a non-profit group that works with media com‐ panies and tech giants on the creation and distribution of AI-generated content.
The image, issued by Catherine and Prince William's Kensington Palace office on Sunday to mark Mother's Day in the U.K., was the first official photo of the Princess of Wales since she had abdominal surgery on Jan. 16, and ultimately has added to rumours swirling around her operation and re‐ covery.
Catherine, 42, left a hospi‐ tal Jan. 29 after a nearly twoweek stay following the plan‐ ned surgery and has not been seen in public since Christmas Day. The reason for the operation has been kept under wraps.
Kate's uncertain health, together with King Charles's recently announced cancer diagnosis, have put the Royal Family under more scrutiny than usual.
Suspicious greenery
Leibowicz says the two biggest giveaways of edits are Princess Charlotte's sleeve - which wraps around her left hand but does not connect with the rest of her arm, suggesting a missing piece of the sleeve was cut away - and the greenery visi‐ ble in the background, during what was supposedly March, before springtime in England.
Several major news agen‐ cies that initially published the photo, including The As‐ sociated Press, Reuters and Getty Images, later pulled it citing concerns about digital manipulation.
Catherine apologized on X, formerly Twitter, "for any confusion" the photo caused, saying, "like many amateur photographers, I do occa‐ sionally experiment with edit‐ ing."
Leibowicz worries the al‐ tered image could lead to greater societal distrust in real images.
"It's problematic that even photo editors didn't catch this," Leibowicz said. "They ran the story. They did kill it, but clearly there are certain protocols in place that needed some time or needed the reaction from the public before taking it down."
Reuters picture editors said the misaligned sleeve suggested the image had been altered, and reported that an examination of its metadata showed it had been saved twice using the photo editing app Adobe Photoshop on an Apple Mac.
"The altered photo didn't meet Reuters standards of image quality, and that is the reason we withdrew it," a
Reuters spokesperson said in an email to CBC News.
Likewise, AP sent out a notice for news outlets to kill the photo from their systems and archives, citing manipu‐ lation. AP allows only minor adjustments to photos, in‐ cluding cropping, colour bal‐ ancing and, when necessary, eliminating dust and scratches to restore the au‐ thentic photograph.
Kensington Palace said it would not release the origi‐ nal unedited photograph.
WATCH | Apology likely 'last we will hear' from palace about photo:
'A lot of changes'
Glenn Honiball, who runs a Toronto-based photo re‐ touching service that works with clients around the wor‐ ld, says the vanishing sleeve is just the tip of the iceberg, and pointed out about a dozen inconsistencies, in‐ cluding blurred hands and hair and missing shirt tex‐ tures.
"There have been a lot of changes made here," he said.
"I'm sure somebody spent a couple hours going through that and changing things, es‐ pecially if they didn't have a lot of experience."
Some of the glaring edit‐ ing errors Honiball cites in‐ clude Charlotte's hair appear‐ ing to fall unnaturally around her right shoulder, with two identical highlighted sections appearing to be copied and pasted.
"It's as if they wanted to make the hair longer and maybe cover something up," he said. "Repeat patterns are a dead giveaway."
Also, Charlotte's skirt sticks out past her sweater and has no pleats or shad‐ ows, which Honiball says in‐ dicates a section of the skirt was also repeated and dropped in.
Another sign is a mis‐ aligned zipper on Catherine's coat, which "seems to disap‐ pear - it goes off in two dif‐ ferent directions."
Honiball says he's inclined to believe Catherine's state‐ ment that she did the editing herself, because it looks like it was done by someone who has some knowledge of Pho‐ toshop but not a great deal of experience. He said it looks like most of the work was done using the soft‐ ware's cloning and liquify tools.
"I think it might have been a little naive of them to put something out that looks ob‐ viously flawed in some areas," he said.
"Maybe the average per‐ son wouldn't notice that. But of course, everybody on the internet's looking for any‐ thing they can find."
WATCH | Health con‐ cerns for Charles, Cather‐ ine: