CBC Edition

SpaceX's Starship test flight makes it to space, but lost before splashdown

- Nicole Mortillaro

SpaceX's Starship megarocket launched from Texas Thursday on its third test flight, staying intact longer than during the pre‐ vious two flights but not making it all the way to its planned splashdown in the Indian Ocean.

During a live webcast of the flight, SpaceX commenta‐ tors said mission control lost communicat­ion with the spacecraft during its atmos‐ pheric re-entry. No people or cargo were aboard.

Minutes after launch from the southern tip of Texas at 8:25 a.m. CT, the booster separated seamlessly from the spaceship and splashed down in the Gulf of Mexico.

The spacecraft cruised halfway around the globe for about an hour and had been nearing its Indian Ocean splashdown when communi‐ cations were cut off.

WATCH | See the mo‐ ment SpaceX's Starship reentered Earth's atmos‐ phere:

A few minutes later, SpaceX confirmed the space‐ craft had been lost, presum‐ ably burning up or coming apart during re-entry or crashing into the sea.

Still, completion of most of the intended test flight tra‐ jectory of Starship marked a major milestone in the devel‐ opment of a spacecraft cruci‐ al to Elon Musk's satellite launch business and NASA's moon program.

Musk congratula­ted his team on social media. "SpaceX has come a long way," he said via X.

The rocket company was founded exactly 22 years ago Thursday.

Dreams of humans on Mars

The 122-metre (or 37-storey) rocket is Musk's pet project, which he says will not only be able to spit out ever more Starlink satellites but also eventually take humans to Mars.

A variation of the SpaceX vessel, called the Human Landing System (HLS), will be critical to putting humans on the lunar surface. In order to do so, SpaceX needs to clear a number of hurdles, includ‐ ing demonstrat­ing a ship-toship transfer of fuel.

Before today, Starship had seen only incrementa­l achievemen­ts.

This launch was referred to as Starship's integrated flight test three (IFT-3), as it is the third time that both the booster and the spaceship it‐ self were launched together.

From the public's perspec‐ tive, IFT-1 and IFT-2 were un‐ mitigated failures.

In the first, last April, the rocket cleared its gargantuan tower before blowing up just four minutes later - Musk and his fans like to use the term "a rapid unschedule­d disassembl­y" - before the booster stage and spaceship could separate.

And that was only what happened in the air.

Back on terra firma, the aftermath was vast. Because IFT-1 went up without a launch suppressio­n system at the pad - something to soften the fiery blast and shockwave - its 33 engines left an enormous crater be‐ low the launch pad. Debris was scattered for kilometres, leading to a barrage of rec‐ ommendatio­ns from federal officials about how to best minimize the harm to the surroundin­g ecosystem by future launches.

The second test flight, last November, had a suppres‐ sion system in place and caused minimal damage to the pad. The rocket success‐ fully lifted off and the two stages managed to separate successful­ly - a demonstra‐ tion of a new way of separa‐ tion called "hot staging."

Unfortunat­ely, the first stage was lost in an explo‐ sion. The second managed to make it into space, reaching 149 kilometres, before it, too, exploded.

While explosions aren't something the public typical‐ ly deems as achievemen­ts, that's not the way space watchers necessaril­y see it. And certainly not SpaceX.

It deemed IFT-1 a success because it cleared the pad without exploding.

The second was touted as a success for proving that hot-staging - when the sec‐ ond stage booster ignites as the first separates - worked. And, as Musk said later, the second stage reached space before exploding.

But with Artemis III breathing down its neck, SpaceX needed to rack up more concrete wins.

NASA chief Bill Nelson congratula­ted SpaceX on what he called "a successful test flight" in a statement posted on X.

Before the third flight, en‐ gineer and former NASA offi‐ cial Dan Dumbacher said he was hesitant to label the first two Starship launches as ei‐ ther successes or failures.

WATCH | Starship criti‐ cal for planned Mars mis‐ sion:

"If I had been looking at it with my old NASA badge on in my old NASA world, they're failures, because NASA has to operate in an environmen­t where [they've] got, as I say, 536 investors watching over my shoulder, making sure I'm using public money appropri‐ ately," he said.

For SpaceX and others in the private sector, it's "a little bit of a different ball game," said Dumbacher, who is now CEO of the American Institute of Aeronautic­s and Astronau‐ tics.

"When you have Elon, or [ Jeff Bezos] funding things, the buck all stops with them" - their private money allows them to operate differentl­y, being somewhat less risk averse than NASA.

But with NASA relying on the triumph of commercial entities, things begin to change: progress needs to be made.

Paul Fjeld, who collabo‐ rated with NASA during the Apollo program, is confident that despite the enormous challenges ahead, SpaceX can rise to the occasion, though perhaps not in the current timeline.

"The engineerin­g chops are there, and that's been demonstrat­ed since the start of it," he said.

WATCH | Second test flight ends in explosions:

In order to reach NASA's safety requiremen­ts, SpaceX's HLS system will need to see close to 14 com‐ plete successful launches, and those won't be based on SpaceX's metric of "success." They all must be unqualifie­d successes.

Seeing as this is just the third flight of the integrated system, it seems there's a long way to go.

Not that it's completely out of reach. Musk recently said the company has ap‐ plied for nine Starship launches in 2024. And SpaceX's Star Base in Boca Chica, Texas, is always a hub of activity with boosters and Starships stacked up in rows.

"The thing that Musk does better than probably any‐ body else in any industry is to scale up and produce things at scale, in large quan‐ tities very quickly," Fjeld said.

"I think he could easily you know, fly again in two months, and then a monthand-a-half, and then a month later, and then every week for the rest of the year at the end."

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada