CBC Edition

Winners of Afghan war memorial design competitio­n claim they were 'cheated' by Ottawa, threaten legal action

- Daniel Leblanc

Architect Renée Daoust and her team say they're considerin­g a lawsuit to get what they argue is rightful‐ ly theirs: the $3.5 million contract to design and build a monument in Ot‐ tawa to commemorat­e Canada's mission in Afghanista­n.

Last June, Daoust and her team learned that they had won the jury-based competi‐ tion but would not be getting the contract to build the monument.

Since then, the team has worked on winning support in the cultural sector, done rounds of media interviews, appeared before a parlia‐ mentary committee and tried to put pressure on the gov‐ ernment.

One member of the team, former Supreme Court jus‐ tice Louise Arbour, even raised the topic directly with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during a private phone call.

Now, the Daoust team is looking at taking Ottawa to court, either to obtain the contract or to receive more in compensati­on than the $34,200 the federal govern‐ ment offered it last year.

"This is not the route that we wanted to take. We might be taking a look at it again because it's taking so much time," Daoust said in an in‐ terview at the Montreal of‐ fices of Daoust Lestage Li‐ zotte Stecker.

"There is a great number of people who were cheated as part of this project."

While she acknowledg­es a legal battle with the federal government would be "David against Goliath," Daoust said her company may have no other option because Ottawa is refusing to enter into any meaningful dialogue.

Daoust said she is seeking justice for her team - Arbour and artist Luca Fortin - be‐ cause the contractin­g pro‐ cess was influenced by politics.

"We're very concerned be‐ cause it does create a prece‐ dent, a very dangerous precedent for Canada in ter‐ ms of competitio­ns, public art competitio­ns, architectu­r‐ al competitio­ns and so on," she said. "There was political interferen­ce, so we don't want this to happen again."

More than 40,000 Canadi‐ ans served in Afghanista­n from 2001 to 2014 - mostly military personnel but also some government and hu‐ manitarian workers. Of those, 158 Canadian military personnel and seven civilians died during the conflict.

The Daoust team won a jury competitio­n in 2021 that was supposed to choose the design team for the monu‐ ment. But on the morning of June 19, 2023, the federal government informed the Daoust team that it would not be getting the contract.

A few hours later, at a press conference, the gov‐ ernment announced that an‐ other team, led by western Indigenous artist Adrian Stimson, had offered the win‐ ning design.

Ottawa explained its deci‐ sion by citing an online survey, conducted in 2021, that found that Stimson's de‐ sign was the favourite among members of the armed forces, military veterans and their families.

The Bloc Québécois and the Conservati­ve Party of Canada have criticized Ot‐ tawa's decision in the House of Commons.

Working behind the scenes, Liberal MP Joël Light‐ bound also tried and failed to change the government's de‐ cision. He is now publicly supporting the Daoust team, saying there is a "procedural flaw" in the federal process.

Lightbound said that while he is confident his gov‐ ernment is simply seeking to respect the wishes of veter‐ ans, the current situation is untenable.

WATCH | Afghanista­n memorial has been mired in controvers­y:

"The road to hell some‐ times is paved with good in‐ tentions and I think that in the process of trying to achieve that good intention, that good goal, the process has not been respectful of the rules that were estab‐ lished by the government it‐ self," said the Liberal MP for the Quebec City riding of Louis-Hébert.

"From the moment the ju‐ ry makes its decision and that those were the rules, for me, it goes without saying that it must be honoured."

According to documents released to a parliament­ary committee, the government ignored its own legal advice in giving the contract to the Stimson team.

The documents say lawyers told the government it had just two options: awarding the contract to the Daoust team or cancelling the competitio­n.

Minister of Veterans Af‐ fairs Ginette Petitpas Taylor told Radio-Canada that the consultati­on conducted by her government in 2021 did not constitute a "scientific survey."

She said she has heard clearly from members of the military community who want to see the Stimson project move forward.

"Overwhelmi­ngly, they re‐ sponded that for them, the Stimson concept really repre‐ sented the loss, the sacrifice and the courage of the men and women that served in Afghanista­n," said Petitpas Taylor.

She said the government wants the design finalized by next year.

"We really want to make sure that the constructi­on of this monument is done in a timely fashion. The veterans have indicated they've been waiting a long time and they certainly want to have an op‐ portunity to have an area to be able to reflect on the mis‐ sion with their kids, their grandchild­ren," she added.

Stimson, now working to finalize the design of his monument, said he didn't wish to comment on the con‐ troversy surroundin­g the se‐ lection process.

Arbour called the federal process to choose the final design "un-Canadian."

"Rather than have a Cana‐ dian government 20 years down the line apologize for having dishonoure­d the peo‐ ple they wanted to honour by having a process that is not an adequate process ... they should reverse the decision," she said.

The former Supreme Court justice said she re‐ cently schooled Prime Minis‐ ter Trudeau on the contract process during a private call.

"I said it's very important to follow the rules. When you have a procuremen­t process for the expenditur­e of Cana‐ dian taxpayers money, the expectatio­n is you follow the rules," she said.

She said she believes the government could compro‐ mise by letting the Daoust team build on the memorial site while paying the Stimson team to build elsewhere.

"If veterans want to have another monument that more reflects their contribu‐ tion to this mission, Canada is a big country and they can build another monument elsewhere," she said.

"But here, rather than tainting this monument with an undemocrat­ic process where the rules were not fol‐ lowed, which will always, I find, harm the honour of those we want to honour, they should correct that. We have time."

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada