CBC Edition

U.S. investors successful­ly demand RBC change how it reports on green, fossil fuel investment­s

- Anis Heydari

Canada's largest bank has reversed course on a policy to disclose how much it in‐ vests in green energy ver‐ sus fossil fuel energy fol‐ lowing demands from New York City's large public pension funds, with envi‐ ronmental groups welcom‐ ing the move but pointing out it doesn't actually re‐ duce carbon emissions yet.

The Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) is one of three financial giants in North America that will start to disclose the ratio of how much money they put into clean energy projects compared to how much they invest in fossil fuel extraction. JPMorgan Chase and Citi also made similar agreements.

"Up until now, RBC had re‐ sisted calls to disclose that ratio clearly across all their lending and investment­s every year," explained New York City Comptrolle­r Brad Lander in an interview with CBC News.

Multiple pension funds overseen by Lander had put forward shareholde­r motions to compel the financial insti‐ tutions to take these steps. Prior to RBC's annual general meeting, set for April 11, the bank's board of directors had recommende­d shareholde­rs vote against doing this.

Essentiall­y, up until April 4, when a press release was issued, RBC's public position was that it would not disclose green energy to fossil fuel in‐ vestment ratios. Now that it has voluntaril­y agreed to do, RBC will not face a public vote of shareholde­rs that could have forced the issue.

Agreement does not re‐ duce emissions

"All they're doing with this agreement is agreeing to show their work," said Lan‐ der, pointing out that the agreement does not require RBC to reduce investing in projects that generate or in‐ crease carbon emissions, though the company has said previously that its lending practices will be "net-zero" by 2050.

"We think that's financiall­y prudent and critical [going net-zero]. Making sure they actually are doing it is a re‐ sponsibili­ty of shareholde­rs and entirely consistent with our fiduciary duty," said Lan‐ der, whose pension funds held $28.22 million US in RBC stock as of November 2022.

WATCH | Candians call‐ ing out pension funds for continuing to invest in fos‐ sil fuel sector:

It's not unusual for large, institutio­nal investors such as pension funds to take a more influentia­l role in cor‐ porate environmen­tal poli‐ cies, according to Sebastian Betermier, an associate pro‐ fessor of finance at McGill University in Montreal and executive director of the In‐ ternationa­l Centre for Pen‐ sion Management.

"What we're looking at here is not a one off," said Betermier, who added that this type of investor activism is happening around the world - and often in ways that are not as public as the NYC funds influencin­g Canada's largest bank.

"Over the past several years, many of the pension funds have committed to go net-zero by 2050 ... engage‐ ment with firms is one of the ways that you can de-car‐ bonize your portfolio," he said.

RBC says it plans to dis‐ close ratio next year

In a statement sent to CBC News, RBC's vice-presi‐ dent of climate Jennifer Liv‐ ingstone said that the com‐ pany will provide a "clean en‐ ergy supply financing ratio" in their 2024 climate report. As the company's 2023 re‐ port was released in March of this year, that report would be expected next year.

"We appreciate the con‐ structive dialogue that we have had with the [New York City comptrolle­r] and plan to engage with them and indus‐ try partners in developing the ratio," wrote Livingston­e.

The bank declined an in‐ terview request from CBC News, but indicated in its statement that its plan is to "increase lending of low-car‐ bon energy and the growth relative to fossil fuels over time."

RBC avoids 'highly em‐ barrassing' situation: envi‐ ronmental group

Climate finance director Richard Brooks with environ‐ mental group Stand.earth said he was surprised to see RBC change its mind on dis‐ closing energy investment ra‐ tios.

"Institutio­nal sharehold‐ ers were voting on the share‐ holder resolution, and then management pulled back and basically capitulate­d to New York City and gave in," said Brooks, who is based in Toronto.

Brooks speculated that

RBC may have been con‐ cerned it would lose the shareholde­r vote, and would be forced to disclose this in‐ formation. Brooks's opinion is that other institutio­nal shareholde­rs of the bank were "really keen to have this data" and so the RBC board's directive to vote against the request may have been ig‐ nored.

"When a bank has an an‐ nual shareholde­r meeting and a vote goes against them, that's highly embar‐ rassing for management. So I think they did the calculus and determined that issuing this type of data would be better than having a failed vote at their annual share‐ holder meeting," said Brooks.

But advocacy group Envi‐ ronmental Defence points out that these steps may not make enough of a difference for those concerned about climate change.

"They need to cut emis‐ sions, not count them," said Julia Segal, senior manager for climate finance with Envi‐ ronmental Defence Canada, who pointed out that RBC has major investment­s in fos‐ sil fuel industries.

"They need to be reducing their investment­s in polluting industries," said Segal.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada