CBC Edition

First Nations men wrongfully convicted in 1973 Winnipeg murder sue over 'cruel and unusual treatment'

- Ozten Shebahkege­t

Two First Nations men who were recently acquitted for the 1973 murder of a Win‐ nipeg man are now taking all three levels of govern‐ ment to court, saying police officers and a Crown prosecutor colluded against them to give false evidence during the trial that led to decades in prison for the men.

Allan Woodhouse, 68, and Brian Anderson, 69, are both members of Pinaymoota­ng First Nation in northern Man‐ itoba who received life sen‐ tences in 1974, after the fatal stabbing of Winnipeg restau‐ rant worker Ting Fong Chan the year before.

Anderson was released on parole in 1987 and Wood‐ house in 1990, but they weren't acquitted by a Mani‐ toba Court of King's Bench judge until last year, shortly after then federal justice minister David Lametti or‐ dered a new trial for the two men.

During the hearing last year where the men were ac‐ quitted, Manitoba Prosecu‐ tion Service executive direc‐ tor Michele Jules told court that the men were wrongfully convicted and their confes‐ sions were "entirely manufac‐ tured by police detectives."

Systemic racism played heavily in both men's convic‐ tions, she said.

In two statements of claim filed at the Manitoba Court of King's Bench on Tuesday, An‐ derson and Woodhouse are suing the federal and provin‐ cial attorneys general, the City of Winnipeg and the province of Manitoba for damages that include pain and suffering, and the loss of their reputation­s, enjoyment of life and developmen­tal ex‐ periences.

"The conduct of the de‐ fendants was high-handed, outrageous, scandalous, reckless, entirely without care or considerat­ion" of An‐ derson and Woodhouse's rights, and "exploited" their vulnerabil­ity as young Indige‐ nous men, the suits say.

None of the allegation­s have been proven in court. Statements of defence have not yet been filed.

The lawsuits accuse Win‐ nipeg police officers of coerc‐ ing Anderson, Woodhouse and two others - Clarence Woodhouse and Russell Woodhouse - into signing false confession­s to Chan's murder, after two teams of officers interrogat­ed them using "violence, threats, raci‐ al slurs and other racialized abuse."

Clarence Woodhouse, who was also found guilty of Chan's murder in 1974, was granted bail by a Manitoba judge last October, while his conviction is reviewed.

His brother, Russell Woodhouse, was also found guilty of manslaught­er and sentenced to 10 years behind bars in connection with the killing. He died several years ago.

Crown had 'win-at-allcosts attitude': suit

According to the lawsuits, police officers coerced con‐ fessions from Anderson and Allan Woodhouse by claiming they had evidence to prove their involvemen­t in the homicide, such as witness statements.

The suits say those con‐ fessions were the only evi‐ dence used by a jury to con‐ vict them in March 1974 in the killing of Chan, a 40-yearold chef and father of two who was beaten and stabbed to death near a downtown constructi­on site on July 17, 1973.

The Manitoba Court of Appeal rejected both of their requests to overturn the con‐ victions later in 1974.

The lawsuits accuse the Winnipeg Police Service of negligence and breaching their duty to provide Ander‐ son and Woodhouse with fair and thorough investigat­ions, saying they instead relied on racist attitudes toward In‐ digenous people and vio‐ lence to coerce confession­s.

The police service failed to properly investigat­e Ander‐ son and Woodhouse's alibis, did not provide them with an interprete­r despite their first language being Ojibwe/Saul‐ teaux, and failed to have an independen­t review done of their original investigat­ion, the suits say.

They allege that the City of Winnipeg failed in its duty to properly train and super‐ vise the officers.

Former Crown prosecutor George Dangerfiel­d is also accused in the suits of "delib‐ erate improper" conduct, as he had a "win-at-all-costs atti‐ tude" to get conviction­s against Anderson and Wood‐ house, knowingly presenting false evidence and mislead‐ ing comments to the jury.

Dangerfiel­d was the pros‐ ecutor behind four other high-profile murder convic‐ tions in Manitoba that were later overturned or quashed.

CBC News could not reach Dangerfiel­d for comment pri‐ or to publicatio­n.

Anderson and Wood‐ house's suits allege Danger‐ field neglected some witness statements and other evi‐ dence during their trial, as well as the systemic racism Winnipeg police had inflicted on them.

Dangerfiel­d and the police officers "intentiona­lly with‐ held informatio­n" from An‐ derson and Woodhouse be‐ fore and after their trial, the suits allege.

The province and Manito‐ ba's attorney general are li‐ able for Dangerfiel­d's ac‐ tions, the suits claim.

The actions of Dangerfiel­d and the police officers "con‐ stituted cruel and unusual treatment and/or punish‐ ment" that "outrages soci‐ ety's sense of decency," the suits say.

Woodhouse served a total of 23 years in prison, primar‐ ily at the Stony Mountain In‐ stitution near Winnipeg.

When he was acquitted last year, Woodhouse had been on his last parole stint since 2009, but had been in and out of prison before that due to parole breaches.

He spent 38 years work‐ ing as an electricia­n inside and out of prison, earning a bachelor's degree in eco‐ nomics from the University of Manitoba in 1990, and started teaching high school math and science courses in Victoria shortly after.

Anderson served nearly 11 years in prison, during which a teacher at one facil‐ ity advocated his innocence to the government and the Parole Board of Canada, the suit says.

Canada breached its duty of care to Anderson under the Criminal Code because it failed to make steps to inves‐ tigate those claims of his in‐ nocence in a timely manner, the lawsuit alleges.

Canada also failed in its duty to ensure Anderson and Woodhouse were treated fairly as Indigenous people in the justice system and that their Charter rights were not violated, according to the suits.

Representa­tives for the province and the City of Win‐ nipeg both declined to com‐ ment on the suit to CBC News. Canada's attorney gen‐ eral's office has not respon‐ ded to CBC's request for comment.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada