Ont. school boards are trying to knock down the social media giants. Do their cases stand a chance?

They were reckless and ma‐ licious, manipulating the brain neurochemistry of young students, getting them hooked on social media platforms, and, in doing so, causing wide‐ spread damage and disrup‐ tion to the education sys‐ tem.

These are just some of the, as of yet, unproven alle‐ gations, made by four On‐ tario school boards in their recently filed statements of claim filed against social media giants Meta Platforms Inc., Snap Inc. and ByteDance Ltd, which operate the plat‐ forms Facebook and Insta‐ gram, Snapchat and TikTok respectively, seeking $4.5 bil‐ lion in total damages.

The lawsuits, possibly the first of their kind in Canada, could take years to litigate, involve dozens of experts, thousands of documents and cost lots and lots of money.

And they may also en‐ counter significant legal chal‐ lenges.

"I do think there are a number of hurdles they're going to face," said Josh Nisker, an injury malpractice lawyer based in Toronto.

Nisker, as both a parent and lawyer, said he does be‐ lieve social media companies need to held accountable for their conduct.

"But having said that, I do have concerns about the via‐ bility of these claims in ques‐ tion, whether they will ulti‐ mately bring about the meaningful change we're hoping for."

WATCH | Social media gi‐ ants 'knowingly' harming children, says TDSB chair:

Who is owed the 'duty of care'?

According to the state‐ ments of claim, the school boards allege that these soci‐ al media companies, through their "unsafe and/or addic‐ tive products" have caused the students to suffer from a slew of mental health issues, including "behavioural dys‐ regulation, learning and at‐ tention impairments."

This has interfered with the school boards' ability to educate children, something required by law, and caused "substantial damages," the statements of claim say. Damages include, according to the lawsuit, a significant drain on school board re‐ sources and personnel in having to deal with the stu‐ dents' mental health issues.

"The defendants have acted in a high-handed, reck‐ less, malicious, and repre‐ hensible manner without due regard for the well-being of the student population and the education system," the statements of claim say.

Duncan Embury, a partner and head of litigation at Ne‐ instein LLP, a Toronto-based firm representing the school board, told CBC News last week the named companies are "mainly responsible" for the social media products that kids use, and share com‐ mon designs or algorithms that lead to "problematic use."

While Embury said he be‐ lieves the lawsuit is the first of its kind in Canada, hun‐ dreds of school boards in the United States, along with some states, have launched similar lawsuits against social media companies.

But Nisker said there are some areas where he be‐ lieves the school boards' case could face challenges, includ‐ ing the legal concept known as "duty of care" - the avoid‐ ance of acts that could cause harm.

There are many existing duties of care that have been recognized by Canadian courts. For example, a mo‐ torist owes a duty of care to other motorists, pedestrians and cyclists, meaning, they must avoid, through their ac‐ tions, inflicting harm.

But in the school boards' lawsuits, the question is whether the social media companies owe a duty of care to the school boards, and not the students who specifically used their pro‐ ducts and may have suffered harm.

"While I'm sure the school boards lawyers will come up with some interesting, thoughtful and creative legal arguments, personally, I'm struggling to see how the court's going to make that connection here," Nisker said.

Defining damages Another legal issue is damages - quantifiable har‐ ms that individuals suffer and which are compensated in law, Nisker said.

In many cases that can be straightforward: an individu‐ al's leg is broken after being hit by a car, and they suffer pain and suffering, lost wages and medical expenses, all related to being hit.

The party suing has to prove the damages they suf‐ fered were caused by the harms.

In the case against the so‐ cial media companies, Nisker said he questions how the school boards will establish that the damages they allege were caused by social media were not caused by other factors, such as the impact of COVID-19 on students men‐ tal health, the impact of re‐ mote learning or just strained academic resources in general.

"I have no doubt that stu‐ dents are suffering, and I have no doubt that there have been strains on school boards and resources and on teachers," he said.

"But the question will be, how do you quantify that? And is it caused by Facebook and TikTok and Snapchat, or is it something else?"

Proving what impact soci‐ al media has on children will be at the heart of the case. The issue of teen mental ill‐ ness and how it's caused or impacted by social media was reignited recently with the release of U.S. social psy‐ chologist Jonathan Haidt's new book: The Anxious Gen‐ eration: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Men‐ tal Illness.

Haidt argues, citing nu‐ merous studies, that the rise of "phone-based childhood" starting in the late 2000s and accelerating, when adoles‐ cents became addicted to their smartphones loaded with social media platforms, has led to an epidemic of mental health issues.

The book has sparked both support and criticism , over just how much these mental health issues are at‐ tributed to social media.

Linda Charmaraman, founder and director of the Youth Media & Wellbeing Re‐ search Lab at Massachusettsbased Wellesley College, said research has found that soci‐ al media can be harmful, but not necessarily.

"It depends on when, why, and how kids and teens use it," she wrote in an email to CBC News.

She said it's hard to tease out the effects of social media on children because researchers can't conduct a randomized controlled trial on this issue.

"Children's lives are com‐ plex and many, many factors are involved that can't be controlled for."

She also cited the Ameri‐ can Psychological Association health advisory of last year, to which she contributed, that found using social media is "not inherently beneficial or harmful to young people.

"In most cases, the effects of social media are depen‐ dent on adolescents' own personal and psychological characteristics and social cir‐ cumstances," the advisory said.

Also last year, the U.S. Surgeon General sounded the alarm on social media and youth mental health, saying in an advisory that while it may offer some ben‐ efits, there are "ample indica‐ tors that social media can al‐ so pose a risk of harm to the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents."

"We don't have enough evidence to say it's safe, and in fact, there is growing evi‐ dence that social media use is associated with harm to young people's mental health," U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy said in a statement at the time of the advisory's release.

WATCH |TikTok, Snapchat respond to On‐ tario school boards' social media lawsuit:

Burden of proof

Brian Cameron, a person‐ al injury lawyer at Oatley Vig‐ mond, said both sides will certainly employ lots of ex‐ perts including neurocogni‐ tive scientists, neuropsychol‐ ogists and pediatric neurolo‐ gists.

But plaintiffs will also have the burden of proving how the social media com‐ panies intentionally get ado‐ lescents hooked on social media, he said

"It's going to be the peo‐ ple who write the code," he said. "It's not about just a neuroccognitive reaction. [They] would have to prove, and they allege, that it was intentional. Now you get into computer coding."

One of the biggest chal‐ lenges facing the plaintiffs may have nothing to do with the law itself, but who they are challenging and the fi‐ nancial resources at their dis‐ posal.

"[The school board has] sued companies that collec‐ tively probably have a net worth higher than most countries," Cameron said.

As well, the case will stretch on for years, he pre‐ dicted.

"You start with a claim this long, the discovery process, is going to be years," he said. "There's different jurisdic‐ tions involved. In terms of complexity of litigation, I don't think it gets more com‐ plex."