CBC Edition

Fear of China gnaws at summit in Washington

- Alexander Panetta

A subcurrent of worry pulsed through a summit this week in Washington between the leaders of the U.S., Japan and the Philip‐ pines.

The concern in question holds global dimensions. It involved a gnawing fear that the world's once-dominant superpower is woefully illequippe­d for the possibilit­y of a maritime standoff in Asia.

America's promises to de‐ fend its friends in the event of a conflict with China are butting against increasing­ly unfriendly math involving ships, budgets and work‐ force.

It explains the flurry of U.S. co-ordination with coun‐ tries located halfway around the world from actual conflic‐ ts raging now in Ukraine and the Middle East.

The three Indo-Pacific democracie­s involved in the summit announced joint mili‐ tary, infrastruc­ture and tech‐ nology projects. They held their first-ever joint maritime drills with Australia last week in the disputed South China Sea.

With Chinese coast guard ships ramming into Filipino resupply trips, the U.S. vowed to defend the Philippine­s and Japan from any attack, and uphold old commitment­s.

In a speech to the U.S. Congress, Japan's prime min‐ ister cast China as the greatest threat to global sta‐ bility, and said all countries must chip in to deter it.

"The democratic nations of the world must have all hands on deck," Fumio Kishi‐ da told U.S. lawmakers.

He touted Japan's historic ramp-up in military spending. Unlike Canada, Japan does plan to hit the spending target of two per cent of GDP within several years.

Yet Kishida's speech pock-marked with angst.

He expressed fear about was bequeathin­g an authoritar­ian world to future generation­s. He also acknowledg­ed the growing exhaustion of Ameri‐ cans dealing with overseas problems.

Speaking to the American mindset, he said: "I detect an undercurre­nt of self-doubt among some Americans about what your role in the world should be."

China military growth 'incredibly concerning'

Even during Kishida's visit, American lawmakers and military leaders elsewhere on Capitol Hill were expressing alarm.

The size of China's naval fleet has zoomed past the U.S. That trend is only accel‐ erating, with its shipbuildi­ng industry more than 200 times bigger and U.S. con‐ struction plagued by multiyear delays.

U.S. officials call China's military buildup the fastest since the Second World War - acknowledg­ing it has more interconti­nental ballistic mis‐ sile launchers than the U.S., more cruise missiles and more sophistica­ted sonic missiles.

Some argue the U.S. still has a naval edge, because its best ships are better than China's and because it has more seafaring allies.

But at the summit on Capitol Hill, they were talking about something far more basic: Logistics. The ability to resupply, refuel and carry troops to distant ships.

One lawmaker had his staff wheel out a billboard filled with brutal numbers. Numbers like 7,000 Chinesefla­gged ocean-going vessels that could be used to supply battleship­s, versus 200 for the U.S., with an aging fleet lacking modern telecom equipment.

"That is incredibly con‐ cerning," said Mike Waltz, the chair of the U.S. House Armed Services Committee.

"We are in a race against time.… Logistics win or lose wars."

A scathing hyper‐ report from the

Washington-based Center For Strategic and Internatio­n‐ al Studies says the U.S. lacks the workforce, raw materials, funding, procuremen­t processes and sense of ur‐ gency to meet its own rhetoric.

It suggests a variety of remedies - from simplifyin­g procuremen­t to stockpilin­g more critical minerals, or even increasing military spending to Cold War levels.

That's easier said than done.

Because there was anoth‐ er developmen­t in Washing‐ ton this week that illustrate­d a cash crush unlike anything the U.S. faced during the Cold War.

The non-partisan Con‐ gressional Budget Office re‐ leased figures heralding the U.S. has crashed into an un‐ wanted milestone. Last month, it spent more in in‐ terest on the national debt, than it spent on national de‐ fence.

U.S. labour unions have proposed a familiar remedy in trade sanctions against China.

The U.S. government is now weighing a union peti‐ tion to impose tariffs. It al‐ leges that Chinese domi‐ nance in shipbuildi­ng was done through nefarious

The tariffs would have little effect by 2027. That's the year U.S. officials say Chinese President Xi Jinping has in‐ structed his military to be ready to invade Taiwan.

They say the Chinese mili‐ tary will be ready by that date, and they describe a po‐ tential Taiwan invasion as a turning point in global affairs.

If China seized that island, it would gain new control over the world's semiconduc‐ tor chips and the world's busiest shipping routes, say assessment­s by the U.S. State Department and mili‐ tary.

All this makes this week's summit a bellwether, of sorts, for allies in Canada and elsewhere struggling to un‐ derstand the modern Ameri‐ can psyche. Countries might find it instructiv­e as a win‐ dow into U.S. policy and its gloomiest preoccupat­ions.

The growing protection‐ ism, obsession with domestic manufactur­ing and pressure on allies to spend more on defence - it's all connected.

It's no accident that fears involving China dominate the memoirs of Donald Trump's trade minister, Robert Lighthizer.

He's best known in Cana‐ da as the hard-nosed inter‐ locutor who renegotiat­ed NAFTA but his book expends far more ink laying out his case that the U.S. is deeply vulnerable, lacking the manu‐ facturing and raw materials for a rapid military buildup.

"China's military is an exis‐ tential threat to the United States," he writes in his book, No Trade Is Free.

"It is building its aggres‐ sive military capability at an unpreceden­ted rate. It is im‐ portant to remember that there are very few dictators in history who built up an ar‐ my and didn't use it."

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada