CBC Edition

Judge orders shared custody of pet dog under new B.C. law

- Karin Larsen

A golden retriever named Stella is now part of legal history in B.C. after an up‐ per court decision based on new laws that recognize pets as family members, not just property.

The ruling is the first of its kind and stems from a claim filed in B.C. Supreme Court in New Westminste­r by a woman seeking to have ex‐ clusive care of the dog after she and her boyfriend broke up last year.

But in his reasons for judgment, Associate Judge Scott Nielsen ordered that custody of Stella be split evenly on a week on/week off basis.

"Both the claimant and the respondent have shown a deep concern about the well being of Stella, and I am satisfied that in the circum‐ stances the custody of Stella should be shared on an inter‐ im without-prejudice basis," said Nielsen.

The decision comes three months after amendments made to the Family Law Act clarify that pets or "compan‐ ion animals" are members of the family and more than the property of whoever bought the animal.

Victoria Shroff, a lawyer who specialize­s in animal rights, says having a B.C. Supreme Court decision based on the new legislatio­n is an important milestone.

'What's so significan­t is the way the judge says ... that animals are sentient beings, and we're going to analyze this case in light of that," said Shroff, who was not involved in the case.

"Any time an upper court starts to acknowledg­e the fact that animals are part of the family - they are our furry family members - it doesn't mean they're not still prop‐ erty under the law, but it means that they have an ele‐ vated status above that of a toaster."

The claimant, Sahar Bayat, a nurse, and her former part‐ ner, Omid Mavedati, a veteri‐ narian, bought the dog in Au‐ gust 2020 when they were living together. The relation‐ ship ended in February 2023, according to the court tran‐ script.

$60K in legal fees

Bayat told CBC News she went to a lawyer after her ex took sole possession of Stella in June of last year because only his name was listed on the dog's birth certificat­e.

She said she spent more than $60,000 on a lawyer and legal fees to bring the cus‐ tody dispute to court.

"It was all worth it and honestly I would do it all over again," said Bayat. "I just couldn't live with the pain of regret. I had to fight for her."

Bayat said the new legisla‐ tion made all the difference in gaining shared custody.

"I'm very happy for the new law," she said. "There's a difference between her and the furniture."

In his decision, Nielson said it was clear Bayat and Mavedati both love the dog, as evidenced by the money and effort invested in the le‐ gal proceeding­s.

He said changes to the laws made in January "essen‐ tially put the ownership of a companion animal, such as Stella, in the context of some‐ thing that goes beyond own‐ ership of a chattel."

The decision outlines how, under the new legislatio­n, the court must now consider eight factors, including the circumstan­ces in which the animal was acquired, the ex‐ tent to which each party cared for it, any history of family violence, and the bond the pet has with any children.

"B.C., being the first province in Canada to have legislatio­n like this, to say what we're doing here is we're actually treating ani‐ mals as beyond merely prop‐ erty ... that is huge," said Shroff.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada