CBC Edition

Will a wildly popular app become a casualty of the new cold war between China and the U.S.?

- Alexander Panetta

TikTok now risks becoming a high-profile casualty of the cold-war sequel devel‐ oping between China and the United States.

It's one of the world's biggest social media platfor‐ ms, wildly popular with younger people. And, within a year, it could be banned in the U.S.

At issue is a provision tacked into a sprawling piece of legislatio­n that officially became law when President Joe Biden signed it Wednes‐ day.

The bill offer the app's Chinese-based parent com‐ pany two choices: Sell the app or see it shut down in its biggest market, sometime between next January and April.

This sets up a year of in‐ tense battles on multiple fronts - in courtrooms, boardrooms and the presi‐ dential election trail.

Here's a summary of the situation.

What just happened

Late Tuesday evening, in a 79-18 vote, the U.S. Senate passed a major national-se‐ curity bill that arms America's allies and sanctions adver‐ saries.

The biggest immediate story in the bill is the longawaite­d weapons delivery to Ukraine - a months-long re‐ supply intended to halt Russ‐ ian advances.

Nearly two-thirds of the $95-billion US package is going to Ukraine's self-de‐ fence, with the remainder going primarily to weapons for Taiwan and Israel.

"It's a good day for Amer‐ ica, it's a good day for Eu‐ rope, and it's a good day for world peace," Biden said, cel‐ ebrating the end of a sixmonth struggle to pass this bill.

"This is consequent­ial." The Republican-led House had tucked the TikTok ele‐ ment into the broader bill, and it had overwhelmi­ng bi‐ partisan support.

It forbids American com‐ panies from distributi­ng, maintainin­g or updating apps controlled by foreign adver‐ saries, defined as North Ko‐ rea, China, Russia and Iran in an existing law.

The bill specifical­ly singles out TikTok and its Chinabased parent company, ByteDance Inc.

The parent company has 270 days - meaning until Jan. 19, 2025 - to sell its product to a buyer in another coun‐ try. Enforcemen­t can be de‐ layed another three months by the president, if there's a sale in progress.

Arguments for the Tik‐ Tok crackdown

The hostile relationsh­ip between the U.S. and China is the context here: Both countries are accelerati­ng a military buildup, and both have officials musing openly about the potential for con‐ flict over Taiwan.

National-security hawks have persuaded a majority of the U.S. Congress that TikTok is a threat to Americans' se‐ curity.

American lawmakers favouring the crackdown call it foolish to grant a Chineseown­ed company control over software on the devices of 170 million Americans.

They describe two fears: One, that the app can spy on Americans, hoovering up their data. Two, that it might become an informatio­n weapon.

After a recent classified briefing on the topic, some U.S. lawmakers said they were disturbed by what they'd been told by intelli‐ gence officials.

"TikTok is a gun aimed at Americans' heads," Democra‐ tic Sen. Richard Blumenthal said afterward.

"The American people need, and deserve, to hear what we've just been told. Because they would be deeply frightened."

U.S. officials do not be‐ lieve assurances that TikTok's data is kept from the Chinese government just because its servers are outside China.

Chinese law, they say, makes clear that the parent company must take orders from the central government and its representa­tives on ByteDance's staff.

ByteDance is even ac‐ cused of helping build Chi‐ na's system for cracking down on the Uyghur mi‐ nority, and of targeting pro‐ testers in Hong Kong.

Leaked audio from TikTok meetings shows that user da‐ ta is repeatedly accessed from that parent company in China.

Meanwhile, TikTok was the only app that monitored users' phone keystrokes among seven major apps tested by a privacy research‐ er and former Google engi‐ neer.

The company called those findings misleading.

When asked about key‐ stroke-monitoring at a con‐ gressional hearing last year, TikTok CEO Chew Shou Zi replied: "Only for security purposes."

He said his company only checked for bots, and said other companies do the same. He said TikTok does not monitor what users type.

Arguments against the crackdown

Up to half the U.S. uses this app. Some Americans earn a living as influencer­s on it, and there's no evidence it's done any of them any harm.

One user with a lot of reach is Sarah Lauren, a Canadian living in New York City. She currently has anoth‐ er job but is thinking of mak‐ ing a full-time living from Tik‐ Tok revenue.

With 740,000 followers, she's drawn tens of millions of views for posts with titles like, "Things Guys Do When They Don't Like You."

"It is definitely scary," she told CBC News this week, when asked about the poten‐ tial U.S. ban.

"I'm lucky because I have a full-time job as well.… But for my friends that are in content creation and they do it as a full-time job, it's really crucial for our income. To be banned, what are they gonna do?"

She advises her fellow in‐ fluencers to start hedging their bets by posting on all platforms, including Insta‐ gram where she has about 40,000 followers.

WATCH | Influencer­s 'are terrified,' says Canadi‐ an on TikTok:

If the U.S. government has evidence that these Ameri‐ cans are at risk, it should show its cards, says one freespeech advocate.

"Currently, there is no public evidence that TikTok has shared user data with the Chinese government," said Kate Ruane, director of the Center for Democracy and Technology's Free Ex‐ pression Project.

Furthermor­e, she said, foreign adversarie­s have oth‐ er ways to scoop up Ameri‐ cans' personal data: They can simply buy it on the open market.

That's why she's urged the U.S. Congress to pass com‐ prehensive legislatio­n regu‐ lating the data economy, in‐ stead of just targeting one company.

For example, she pointed to the American Privacy Rights Act. The still-unpassed bill would limit what platfor‐ ms can collect, and sell to da‐ ta-brokers, without user con‐ sent. It would let users learn more about what data is col‐ lected, be able to opt out, force data sellers to be publi‐ cly transparen­t and would give state and federal author‐ ities more power to punish abuses.

Separately, there's a bill in the Senate - the Kids Online Safety Act - that would force sweeping reforms across the industry, intended to protect young users.

Next up: Big battles Internatio­nal companies will surely make big offers to buy this hot digital commod‐ ity. But the Chinese govern‐ ment has hinted it would block a sale.

The superpower­s will ac‐ cuse each other of hypocrisy. China, after all, is now crying foul, but it bans U.S. products like Google, Facebook, X and Instagram. The U.S., mean‐ while, will be accused of se‐ lective commitment to free speech.

The inevitable lawsuits could lead to the U.S. Supreme Court. TikTok promises to sue, as it did with some success when fac‐ ing a ban in Montana.

"Make no mistake: This is a ban," the TikTok CEO, Chew, said in a statement Wednes‐ day about the new law. "We will keep fighting for your rights in the courts. The facts, and the Constituti­on, are on our side."

The Montana lawsuit of‐ fers a preview of the argu‐ ments.

The company argued the ban violated multiple clauses of the U.S. Constituti­on. The free-speech protection­s in the First Amendment, for starters. It also cited the socalled bill of attainder clause in Article 1, which forbids as‐ signing guilt and punishing someone in a law without a trial.

A federal judge has tem‐ porarily blocked Montana's ban: "[This] likely violates the First Amendment," wrote dis‐ trict court Judge Donald Mol‐ loy.

Finally, there's the presi‐ dential election.

Donald Trump has done a head-snapping, 180-degree turn. He tried unilateral­ly banning TikTok when he was president, but was rebuked by the courts. Now he's on good terms with a major campaign donor who is also a major shareholde­r in Tik‐ Tok.

Trump has suddenly transforme­d himself into a TikTok champion.

And he's been transparen­t in how he intends to use this on the campaign trail: To try peeling young voters away from Biden in a close elec‐ tion.

"Young people, and lots of others, must remember this … when they vote," Trump posted on his own socialmedi­a site, blaming Biden for a potential ban.

When Chuck Schumer, the Democratic congressio­nal leader, was asked Tuesday about possible political blow‐ back, he recited the history of the bill.

It was the Republican-led House that passed a TikTok ban last month. That bill was idling in the Senate. Then the Republican House passed it again Saturday, he noted.

This time the measure was stuck into a bigger bill the Senate was desperatel­y keen on passing: Aid for Ukraine, in particular, which had been stalled for months.

Four days later, it's been signed by the president. And the countdown starts to a po‐ tential ban as soon as Jan. 19, 2025 - the last full day of Biden's current term.

"Finally, finally, finally," Schumer said as the Senate passed the national security package, which it had strug‐ gled for over six months to advance.

"America sends a mes‐ sage to the entire world: We will not turn our back on you. Tonight we tell our allies 'we stand with you.' We tell our adversarie­s 'don't mess with us.'"

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada