Ottawa plans to launch controversial firearms buyback program during election year

Ottawa is planning to roll out a mandatory buyback program for military-style firearms during the 2025 election year, after the pro‐ gram was delayed by Cana‐ da Post's refusal to partici‐ pate, sources say.

With only months to go before its launch, details of the vast logistical operation remain in flux, federal offi‐ cials have told Radio-Canada.

The government likely will need to adapt the program on a province-by-province basis, due to its struggle to find partners willing to collect and transport AR-15s and other weapons that were banned in 2020.

Under the terms of that ban, an estimated 140,000 weapons in Canada cannot be used or sold until the gov‐ ernment buys them back.

"No one is rushing to par‐ ticipate in the program," said a federal government source who was not authorized to comment on the matter pub‐ licly.

The Liberals are planning to launch the program next year, even though their mi‐ nority government will face confidence votes on its spring budget and the elec‐ tion must be called by Sep‐ tember.

The Conservative Party and its leader Pierre Poilievre are firmly opposed to the buyback program, as are the governments of Alberta and Saskatchewan.

One expert said the gov‐ ernment is leaving itself little room to manoeuvre, given the risk of logistical prob‐ lems, high costs and tensions with gun owners.

"The government will be facing problems that could slow down the implementa‐ tion of the buyback program. It's a risky move for the Liber‐ als," said Frédéric Boily, pro‐ fessor of political science at the University of Alberta.

Ottawa has been promis‐ ing to launch this program ever since it banned the sale and use of 1,500 models of firearms on May 1, 2020. The buyback plan has the sup‐ port of the gun control move‐ ment but faces stiff opposi‐ tion from hunters and shooters.

"This seems to be a situa‐ tion in which the Liberals promised a lot, and maybe they promised too much," said Boily.

The government had to go back to the drawing board after Canada Post refused to collect banned weapons at its post offices, citing security concerns.

Canada Post is refusing to comment on the matter but sources within the organiza‐ tion said many post offices have little security, with no alarm systems or surveil‐ lance cameras.

"Zero," said a Canada Post employee when asked to de‐ scribe security at his post of‐ fice in a small municipality. "The government is crazy if it thinks we can do this safely."

Ottawa was hoping gun owners would pack their un‐ loaded weapons in boxes provided to them before bringing them back to Cana‐ da Post to be transported and destroyed.

But many warned that thieves would exploit lax se‐ curity at post offices to steal high-powered weapons that fetch high prices on the black market.

Canada Post also worried about employees being ex‐ posed to angry confronta‐ tions with people who do not want to give up their guns.

In a media statement, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers said "our members' health and safety must be a priority."

Several government sources say Ottawa is still considering options to collect the banned weapons.

Ottawa might ask police for help with buyback program

Sources said Ottawa could vary how it runs the program regionally, depending on the willingness of provincial gov‐ ernments and local police to participate.

The government is looking at the possibility of working with law enforcement to col‐ lect weapons, despite the stated opposition to the pro‐ gram of some police groups and police chiefs. The provin‐ cial police services in Quebec and Ontario could be called upon to take part, said a fed‐ eral source.

Sources also said the gov‐ ernment is aware that using police officers to operate the buyback program is not the most effective use of policing resources; the federal gov‐ ernment is considering the idea of hiring private security firms.

The government is also considering creating "dropoff points" where owners could return their weapons.

In New Zealand, where a semi-automatic buyback pro‐ gram was implemented in 2019, police organized hun‐ dreds of temporary collection points across the country where citizens could return their banned rifles.

Even though the govern‐ ment is reluctant to force Canada Post's hand, sources said Ottawa still hopes the Crown corporation can be convinced to participate.

There are approximately 50,000 banned firearms in Al‐ berta that will be hard to re‐ cover.

"No one wants to be in‐ volved in this program be‐ cause it is so unpopular," said Teri Bryant, Alberta's chief firearms officer. "I don't see any way it can be done."

The Liberals promised in both the 2019 and 2021 elec‐ tions to buy back assault or military-style weapons. Its credibility on gun control could be damaged if it does not launch its buyback pro‐ gram by the next election.

A survivor of the 1989 gun massacre at the École Poly‐ technique in Montreal said she wants the program to be in place in time for the next anniversary commemora‐ tion.

"You know, in December, it will be the 35th anniversary of the events at Polytech‐ nique. For us, it is necessary for the buyback program to be in place and active," said Nathalie Provost of the PolyRemembers group, which lobbies for tougher gun control in Canada.

Federal Liberals in Que‐ bec, in particular, want the government to do everything in its power to fulfil its promise before the next elec‐ tion, sources said.

"There are progressive votes that we need," said a Liberal source. "It's going to happen."