Edmonton Journal

Falling for our faux waterfall

-

In a city deeply split over the merits of a new downtown arena and with a proven predisposi­tion to differ starkly over everything from public transit to airport lands to the starting lineup of the Edmonton Eskimos, there is surprising­ly little division when it comes to the Great Divide Waterfall. Almost everyone is fond of Edmonton’s giant water feature. This week came heartening news that the waterfall on the High Level Bridge, a sorrowful dry gulch these past three years, could soon flow again. The spigots have been shut off since August 2009 over concerns about the environmen­tal impact of the chlorinate­d water it spilled into the river. City officials had become concerned the chlorine levels from all that tap water might be in violation of the federal Fisheries Act.

The costs of installing and maintainin­g a dechlorina­tion system appear prohibitiv­e, but the prospects of converting to raw river water seem promising, particular­ly now that this option has been endorsed by North Saskatchew­an Riverkeepe­r Glenn Isaac. Phillip Walker, who was the city’s drainage manager when the landmark project opened 12 years ago, also turned up at a meeting of council’s executive committee Wednesday to urge that the waterfall be restored. Switching to river water would require a $2-million expenditur­e for the pump and intake system — a not inconsider­able water bill that the committee will send on to council as part of its fall budget deliberati­ons.

Walker described the cascade, which used to rain down into the river for several hours at a time, four or five times a year, as “part of Edmonton’s fabric.”

The Edmonton Arts Council is also strongly on board with the river water conversion, as it should be, inasmuch as the waterfall has long been the city’s biggest and most accessible public art installati­on.

Mayor Stephen Mandel senses, on this issue at least, that most Edmontonia­ns are in favour of restoring the falls. “People want the waterfall,” he said. “They want to see the waterfall.”

Back in 1978, when artist Peter Lewis first proposed a waterfall across the High Level, a Journal article described the idea as “ambitious to be sure. And crazy in a way. And completely marvellous.” It took Lewis awhile to put the project together — with the help of $100,000 in provincial money and $500,000 more in donations of time and equipment — but when the waterfall finally sprung to life on Sept. 1, 1980, as a grand 75th birthday present for the province of Alberta, it proved marvellous indeed.

Wouldn’t it be fitting to turn the taps on again in time to showcase the High Level Bridge’s 100th birthday next year?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada